IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0278830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional courage buffers against institutional betrayal, protects employee health, and fosters organizational commitment following workplace sexual harassment

Author

Listed:
  • Alec M Smidt
  • Alexis A Adams-Clark
  • Jennifer J Freyd

Abstract

Workplace sexual harassment is associated with negative psychological and physical outcomes. Recent research suggests that harmful institutional responses to reports of wrongdoing–called institutional betrayal—are associated with additional psychological and physical harm. It has been theorized that supportive responses and an institutional climate characterized by transparency and proactiveness—called institutional courage—may buffer against these negative effects. The current study examined the association of institutional betrayal and institutional courage with workplace outcomes and psychological and physical health among employees reporting exposure to workplace sexual harassment. Adults who were employed full-time for at least six months were recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform and completed an online survey (N = 805). Of the full sample, 317 participants reported experiences with workplace sexual harassment, and only this subset of participants were included in analyses. We used existing survey instruments and developed the Institutional Courage Questionnaire-Specific to assess individual experiences of institutional courage within the context of workplace sexual harassment. Of participants who experienced workplace sexual harassment, nearly 55% also experienced institutional betrayal, and 76% experienced institutional courage. Results of correlational analyses indicated that institutional betrayal was associated with decreased job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and increased somatic symptoms. Institutional courage was associated with the reverse. Furthermore, results of multiple regression analyses indicated that institutional courage appeared to attenuate negative outcomes. Overall, our results suggest that institutional courage is important in the context of workplace sexual harassment. These results are in line with previous research on institutional betrayal, may inform policies and procedures related to workplace sexual harassment, and provide a starting point for research on institutional courage.

Suggested Citation

  • Alec M Smidt & Alexis A Adams-Clark & Jennifer J Freyd, 2023. "Institutional courage buffers against institutional betrayal, protects employee health, and fosters organizational commitment following workplace sexual harassment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(1), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0278830
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278830
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278830&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0278830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Glomb, Theresa M. & Richman, Wendy L. & Hulin, Charles L. & Drasgow, Fritz & Schneider, Kimberly T. & Fitzgerald, Louise F., 1997. "Ambient Sexual Harassment: An Integrated Model of Antecedents and Consequences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 309-328, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naveed Iqbal Chaudhry & Hakim Ali Mahesar & Saima Kamran Pathan & Amina Arshad & AsadMunir Butt, 2017. "The Mediating Role Of Workplace Interpersonal Mistreatment: An Empirical Investigation Of Banking Sector Of Pakistan," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 13(1), pages 13-16.
    2. Morrow, Paula C. & McElroy, James C. & Scheibe, Kevin P., 2011. "Work unit incivility, job satisfaction, and total quality management among transportation employees," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1210-1220.
    3. Robert Giacalone & Mark Promislo, 2010. "Unethical and Unwell: Decrements in Well-Being and Unethical Activity at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 275-297, January.
    4. Marcia Miceli & Janet Near & Terry Dworkin, 2009. "A Word to the Wise: How Managers and Policy-Makers can Encourage Employees to Report Wrongdoing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 379-396, May.
    5. M. Hershcovis & Sharon Parker & Tara Reich, 2010. "The Moderating Effect of Equal Opportunity Support and Confidence in Grievance Procedures on Sexual Harassment from Different Perpetrators," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 415-432, March.
    6. Robert Gillanders & Roisin Lyons & Lisa van der Werff, 2021. "Social sexual behaviour and co-worker trust in start-up enterprises," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 765-780, August.
    7. Barnes, Christopher M. & Schaubroeck, John & Huth, Megan & Ghumman, Sonia, 2011. "Lack of sleep and unethical conduct," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 169-180, July.
    8. Naveed Iqbal Chaudhry & Hakim Ali Mahesar & Saima Kamran Pathan & Amina Arshad & AsadMunir Butt, 2017. "The Mediating Role Of Workplace Interpersonal Mistreatment: An Empirical Investigation Of Banking Sector Of Pakistan," IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science, vol. 13(1), pages 73-88.
    9. Schilpzand, P. & Leavitt, K. & Lim, S., 2016. "Incivility hates company: Shared incivility attenuates rumination, stress, and psychological withdrawal by reducing self-blame," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 33-44.
    10. Iain Coyne & Alana-Marie Gopaul & Marilyn Campbell & Alexandra Pankász & Robyn Garland & Frances Cousans, 2019. "Bystander Responses to Bullying at Work: The Role of Mode, Type and Relationship to Target," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 813-827, July.
    11. Claudia Benavides Espinoza & George Cunningham, 2010. "Observers’ Reporting of Sexual Harassment: The Influence of Harassment Type, Organizational Culture, and Political Orientation," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 323-337, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0278830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.