IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0276428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male survivorship and the evolution of eusociality in partially bivoltine sweat bees

Author

Listed:
  • Jodie Gruber
  • Jeremy Field

Abstract

Eusociality, where workers typically forfeit their own reproduction to assist their mothers in raising siblings, is a fundamental paradox in evolutionary biology. By sacrificing personal reproduction, helpers pay a significant cost, which must be outweighed by indirect fitness benefits of helping to raise siblings. In 1983, Jon Seger developed a model showing how in the haplodiploid Hymenoptera (ants, wasps and bees), a partially bivoltine life cycle with alternating sex ratios may have promoted the evolution of eusociality. Seger predicted that eusociality would be more likely to evolve in hymenopterans where a foundress produces a male-biased first brood sex ratio and a female-biased second brood. This allows first brood females to capitalize on super-sister relatedness through helping to produce the female-biased second brood. In Seger’s model, the key factor driving alternating sex ratios was that first brood males survive to mate with females of both the second and the first brood, reducing the reproductive value of second brood males. Despite being potentially critical in the evolution of eusociality, however, male survivorship has received little empirical attention. Here, we tested whether first brood males survive across broods in the facultatively eusocial sweat bee Halictus rubicundus. We obtained high estimates of survival and, while recapture rates were low, at least 10% of first brood males survived until the second brood. We provide empirical evidence supporting Seger’s model. Further work, measuring brood sex ratios and comparing abilities of first and second brood males to compete for fertilizations, is required to fully parameterize the model.

Suggested Citation

  • Jodie Gruber & Jeremy Field, 2022. "Male survivorship and the evolution of eusociality in partially bivoltine sweat bees," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0276428
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0276428
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0276428&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0276428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. J. Bonner & C. J. Schwarz, 2006. "An Extension of the Cormack–Jolly–Seber Model for Continuous Covariates with Application to Microtus pennsylvanicus," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 142-149, March.
    2. M. Stürup & B. Baer-Imhoof & D.R. Nash & J.J. Boomsma & B. Baer, 2013. "When every sperm counts: factors affecting male fertility in the honeybee Apis mellifera," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1192-1198.
    3. John Maynard Smith, 1998. "The origin of altruism," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6686), pages 639-640, June.
    4. Andrés E. Quiñones & Ido Pen, 2017. "A unified model of Hymenopteran preadaptations that trigger the evolutionary transition to eusociality," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai A. Konrad & Florian Morath, 2011. "Evolutionarily stable in-group favoritism and out-group spite in intergroup conflict," Working Papers evolutionarily_stable, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    2. Peña, Jorge & González-Forero, Mauricio, 2020. "Eusociality through conflict dissolution via maternal reproductive specialization," IAST Working Papers 20-110, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
    3. Martin Kaae Jensen & Alexandros Rigos, 2012. "Evolutionary Games with Group Selection," Discussion Papers 13-05, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    4. R. King & S. P. Brooks & T. Coulson, 2008. "Analyzing Complex Capture–Recapture Data in the Presence of Individual and Temporal Covariates and Model Uncertainty," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1187-1195, December.
    5. Dalton J. Hance & Russell W. Perry & John M. Plumb & Adam C. Pope, 2020. "A temporally stratified extension of space‐for‐time Cormack–Jolly–Seber for migratory animals," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 900-912, September.
    6. Riki Herliansyah & Ruth King & Stuart King, 2022. "Laplace Approximations for Capture–Recapture Models in the Presence of Individual Heterogeneity," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(3), pages 401-418, September.
    7. Matthew R. Schofield & Richard J. Barker & Peter Taylor, 2013. "Modeling Individual Specific Fish Length from Capture–Recapture Data using the von Bertalanffy Growth Curve," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(4), pages 1012-1021, December.
    8. J. Andrew Royle, 2008. "Modeling Individual Effects in the Cormack–Jolly–Seber Model: A State–Space Formulation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(2), pages 364-370, June.
    9. Herbert Gintis, 2003. "Solving the Puzzle of Prosociality," Rationality and Society, , vol. 15(2), pages 155-187, May.
    10. Jakub Stoklosa & Wen-Han Hwang & Sheng-Hai Wu & Richard Huggins, 2011. "Heterogeneous Capture–Recapture Models with Covariates: A Partial Likelihood Approach for Closed Populations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1659-1665, December.
    11. Simon J. Bonner & Byron J. T. Morgan & Ruth King, 2010. "Continuous Covariates in Mark-Recapture-Recovery Analysis: A Comparison of Methods," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 1256-1265, December.
    12. Antoci, Angelo & Russu, Paolo & Zarri, Luca, 2014. "Tax evasion in a behaviorally heterogeneous society: An evolutionary analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 106-115.
    13. Stefano Dughera & Alain Marciano, 2020. "Altruism, predation and the Samaritan's dilemma," Working Papers hal-02550432, HAL.
    14. Simon J. Bonner & Wei Zhang & Jiaqi Mu, 2024. "On the identifiability of the trinomial model for mark‐recapture‐recovery studies," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), February.
    15. Stoklosa, Jakub & Dann, Peter & Huggins, Richard M. & Hwang, Wen-Han, 2016. "Estimation of survival and capture probabilities in open population capture–recapture models when covariates are subject to measurement error," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 74-86.
    16. Henrich, Joseph, 2004. "Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 3-35, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0276428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.