IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0261115.html

Studying how state health services delivery policies can mitigate the effects of disasters on drug addiction treatment and overdose: Protocol for a mixed-methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew D Eisenberg
  • Alexander McCourt
  • Elizabeth A Stuart
  • Lainie Rutkow
  • Kayla N Tormohlen
  • Michael I Fingerhood
  • Luis Quintero
  • Sarah A White
  • Emma Elizabeth McGinty

Abstract

Background: The United States is experiencing a drug addiction and overdose crisis, made worse by the COVID-19 pandemic. Relative to other types of health services, addiction treatment and overdose prevention services are particularly vulnerable to disaster-related disruptions for multiple reasons including fragmentation from the general medical system and stigma, which may lead decisionmakers and providers to de-prioritize these services during disasters. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. states implemented multiple policies designed to mitigate disruptions to addiction treatment and overdose prevention services, for example policies expanding access to addiction treatment delivered via telehealth and policies designed to support continuity of naloxone distribution programs. There is limited evidence on the effects of these policies on addiction treatment and overdose. This evidence is needed to inform state policy design in future disasters, as well as to inform decisions regarding whether to sustain these policies post-pandemic. Methods: The overall study uses a concurrent-embedded design. Aims 1–2 use difference-in-differences analyses of large-scale observational databases to examine how state policies designed to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on health services delivery influenced addiction treatment delivery and overdose during the pandemic. Aim 3 uses a qualitative embedded multiple case study approach, in which we characterize local implementation of the state policies of interest; most public health disaster policies are enacted at the state level but implemented at the local level by healthcare systems and local public health authorities. Discussion: Triangulation of results across methods will yield robust understanding of whether and how state disaster-response policies influenced drug addiction treatment and overdose during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results will inform policy enactment and implementation in future public health disasters. Results will also inform decisions about whether to sustain COVID-19 pandemic-related changes to policies governing delivery addiction and overdose prevention services long-term.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew D Eisenberg & Alexander McCourt & Elizabeth A Stuart & Lainie Rutkow & Kayla N Tormohlen & Michael I Fingerhood & Luis Quintero & Sarah A White & Emma Elizabeth McGinty, 2021. "Studying how state health services delivery policies can mitigate the effects of disasters on drug addiction treatment and overdose: Protocol for a mixed-methods study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0261115
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0261115
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0261115&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0261115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doerr, Sebastian & Kabaş, Gazi & Ongena, Steven, 2024. "Population Aging and Bank Risk-Taking," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(7), pages 3037-3061, November.
    2. repec:abf:journl:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:24253-24254 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. ., 2020. "Taking stock and looking ahead," Chapters, in: Science Evaluation and Status Creation, chapter 7, pages 135-152, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Jan-Emmanuel de Neve & Andrew E. Clark & Christian Krekel & Richard Layard & Gus O’donnell, 2020. "Taking a wellbeing years approach to policy choice," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02973078, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Doerr & Thomas Drechsel & Donggyu Lee, 2021. "Income inequality, financial intermediation, and small firms," BIS Working Papers 944, Bank for International Settlements.
    2. Strong, Peter & Shenvi, Aditi & Yu, Xuewen & Papamichail, K. Nadia & Wynn, Henry P. & Smith, Jim Q., 2023. "Building a Bayesian decision support system for evaluating COVID-19 countermeasure strategies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113632, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Skarda, Ieva & Asaria, Miqdad & Cookson, Richard, 2022. "Evaluating childhood policy impacts on lifetime health, wellbeing and inequality: Lifecourse distributional economic evaluation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    4. Ma, Zhilong & Jiao, Ruoshui & DongZhi, CaiRang, 2025. "Population aging, financial literacy and household consumption," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    5. Lo, Andrew W. & Thakor, Richard T., 2023. "Financial intermediation and the funding of biomedical innovation: A review," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    6. Aden Kadir & Dirir Sadik Aden, 2023. "Charting the Course for Sustainable Aging: Socio-Environmental and Economic Impacts on Djiboutian Elderly Population," Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, Sciendo, vol. 3(1), pages 10-36, June.
    7. Patrick A. Imam & Christian Schmieder, 2026. "Aging gracefully: steering the banking sector through demographic shifts," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(9), pages 1778-1795, February.
    8. Lugo, Stefano, 2025. "Inequality and capital structure," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Hoskins, Stephen & Johnston, David W. & Kunz, Johannes S. & Shields, Michael A. & Staub, Kevin E., 2024. "The importance of sampling frequency for estimates of well-being dynamics," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    10. Li, Lixu & Ye, Fei & Zhan, Yuanzhu & Kumar, Ajay & Schiavone, Francesco & Li, Yina, 2022. "Unraveling the performance puzzle of digitalization: Evidence from manufacturing firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 54-64.
    11. Thoma, Johanna, 2021. "Weighing the costs and benefits of public policy: on the dangers of single metric accounting," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112689, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Wang, Hua & Chen, Yaorui, 2024. "The impact of population aging on capital structure decisions and capital market efficiency: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
    13. Cristiana Lucreția POP, 2020. "Physical Activity During Coronavirus Isolation," Marathon, Department of Pshisycal Education and Sport, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 47-51, June.
    14. Adler, Matthew D. & Dolan, Paul & Henwood, Amanda & Kavetsos, Georgios, 2022. "“Better the devil you know”: Are stated preferences over health and happiness determined by how healthy and happy people are?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    15. Yavuz Arslan & Ahmet Degerli & Gazi Kabas, 2025. "Unintended Consequences of Unemployment Insurance Benefits: The Role of Banks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 2847-2866, April.
    16. Sarah Yanyue Yu, 2021. "An In Medias Res Economic Cost‐Benefit Analysis of ACT Container Deposit Scheme," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 40(1), pages 78-90, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0261115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.