IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0260349.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Augmented proximity: Integration of physical and virtual proximity to enhance network connectivity

Author

Listed:
  • Mi Chang
  • Ji-Hyun Lee

Abstract

With the continuing increase in online communications, virtual proximity as well as physical proximity has become a common way to connect individuals. Virtual proximity refers to the psychological closeness felt by people based on their participation in a virtual space. Hence, augmenting physical proximity with virtual types is believed to enhance connectivity within social networks, and applications that consider both types have the capability to provide new forms of interaction. However, despite the importance of their coexistence, these proximity concepts have been studied separately or are being integrated using diverse terminologies that often lead to misunderstandings. Furthermore, although some applications reflect the two proximity types (e.g., location-based services), there is no metric of comparison. This paper proposes the concept of augmented proximity (AP), which combines physical and virtual forms into a network analogous to one of mixed reality (MR). The concept provides a clear distinction between physical and virtual proximity using a single quantitative value. Using this concept, a formal taxonomy is established to compare and evaluate AP-based networks. The taxonomy consists of three dimensions that can be analyzed using graph theory, including the extent of connectivity degree, diffusion effect, and extent of perceived closeness. Furthermore, using the services underlying AP-based network, the proposed taxonomy can be applied to evaluate the suitability of the services as an indicator for comparison. The results show that one of the two services has a higher taxonomy-based value, and a reasonable basis for selecting one based on proximity is established. This study suggests that AP will play an important role as a quantitative indicator in developing and comparing applications that consider proximity in both virtual and physical modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi Chang & Ji-Hyun Lee, 2021. "Augmented proximity: Integration of physical and virtual proximity to enhance network connectivity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0260349
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0260349
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0260349&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0260349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Roman Miller & Hanseul Jun & Fernanda Herrera & Jacob Yu Villa & Greg Welch & Jeremy N Bailenson, 2019. "Social interaction in augmented reality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Claudia Werker & Vladimir Korzinov & Scott Cunningham, 2019. "Formation and output of collaborations: the role of proximity in German nanotechnology," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 697-719, April.
    3. Hellmanzik, Christiane & Schmitz, Martin, 2015. "Virtual proximity and audiovisual services trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 82-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Li, 2020. "Internet Development and Structural Transformation: Evidence from China," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8.
    2. Jie Duan & Zengxi Hu, 2024. "Internet linkage and international trade: From the perspective of risk alleviation," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(8), pages 3551-3577, August.
    3. Savina Gygli & Florian Haelg & Niklas Potrafke & Jan-Egbert Sturm, 2019. "Publisher Correction to: The KOF Globalisation Index – revisited," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 575-575, September.
    4. Harms, Philipp & Shuvalova, Daria, 2020. "Cultural distance and international trade in services: A disaggregate view," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    5. Li, Jing & Yu, Qian, 2024. "Scientists’ disciplinary characteristics and collaboration behaviour under the convergence paradigm: A multilevel network perspective," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    6. Emerson Gomes Santos & Renato Garcia & Veneziano Araujo & Suelene Mascarini & Ariana Costa, 2021. "Spatial and non‐spatial proximity in university–industry collaboration: Mutual reinforcement and decreasing effects," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 1249-1261, August.
    7. Wedel, Michel & Bigné, Enrique & Zhang, Jie, 2020. "Virtual and augmented reality: Advancing research in consumer marketing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 443-465.
    8. Maria Tsouri, 2022. "Knowledge networks and strong tie creation: the role of relative network position," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 95-114, January.
    9. Tobias Koopmann & Maximilian Stubbemann & Matthias Kapa & Michael Paris & Guido Buenstorf & Tom Hanika & Andreas Hotho & Robert Jäschke & Gerd Stumme, 2021. "Proximity dimensions and the emergence of collaboration: a HypTrails study on German AI research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(12), pages 9847-9868, December.
    10. Jeon, Doh-Shin & Jullien, Bruno & Klimenko, Mikhail, 2021. "Language, internet and platform competition," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    11. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2022. "Factors influencing the behavioral intention to adopt a technological innovation from a developing country context: The case of mobile augmented reality games," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    12. Das, Satya P. & Sant’Anna, Vinicios P., 2023. "Determinants of bilateral trade in manufacturing and services: A unified approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    13. Gianpiero Meloni & Dimitri Paolini & J. D. Tena, 2018. "American beauty: trade flows and export costs of US movies," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 42(4), pages 701-716, November.
    14. Hellmanzik, Christiane & Schmitz, Martin, 2017. "Taking gravity online: The role of virtual proximity in international finance," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 164-179.
    15. Herman, Peter R. & Oliver, Sarah, 2023. "Trade, policy, and economic development in the digital economy," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Qingshu Xia & Boxu Zhou, 2024. "The impact of common language on international trade: Evidence from Korean language," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-18, August.
    17. Christiane Hellmanzik & Martin Schmitz, 2016. "The impact of cultural exceptions: audiovisual services trade and trade policy," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(10), pages 695-700, July.
    18. Hayakawa, Kazunobu & Mukunoki, Hiroshi, 2022. "How does additive manufacturing change trade?: evidence from trade in sound recordings," IDE Discussion Papers 848, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    19. Naoto Jinji & Ayumu Tanaka, 2020. "How does UNESCO’s Convention on Cultural Diversity affect trade in cultural goods?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 44(4), pages 625-660, December.
    20. Xianhai Huang & Xueyin Song & Xinyue Hu, 2018. "Does “Internet Plus” Promote New Export Space for Firms? Evidence from China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 26(6), pages 50-71, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0260349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.