IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0257412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving health care from the bottom up: Factors for the successful implementation of kaizen in acute care hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Kosta Shatrov
  • Camilla Pessina
  • Kaspar Huber
  • Bernhard Thomet
  • Andreas Gutzeit
  • Carl Rudolf Blankart

Abstract

Background: Kaizen—a management technique increasingly employed in health care—enables employees, regardless of their hierarchy level, to contribute to the improvement of their organization. The approach puts special emphasis on frontline employees because it represents one of their main opportunities to participate directly in decision making. In this study, we aimed to (1) understand the experiences of nurses in two hospitals that had recently implemented kaizen, and (2) identify factors affecting the implementation of the technique. Methods: By means of purposeful sampling, we selected 30 nurses from different units in two private acute care hospitals in Switzerland in May 2018. We used the Organizational Transformation Model to conduct semi-structured interviews and perform qualitative content analysis. Lastly, originating from Herzberg’s motivation theory, we suggest two types of factor influencing the implementation of kaizen—hygiene factors that may prevent nurses from getting demotivated, and motivational factors that may boost their motivation. Results: Nurses generally experienced kaizen as a positive practice that enabled them to discuss work-related activities in a more comprehensive manner. In some cases, however, a lack of visible improvement in the workplace lowered nurses’ motivation to make suggestions. Nurses’ attitudes towards kaizen differed across both hospitals depending on the available managerial support, resources such as infrastructure and staffing levels. Conclusions: From our findings, we derived several coping strategies to help health practitioners implement kaizen for the benefit of their organization and employees: Strong managerial support, appropriate use of kaizen tools, and a greater sense of team cohesion, among other factors, can influence how effectively hospital teams implement kaizen. To reap the benefits of kaizen, hospital managers should promote the exchange of opinions across hierarchy levels, allocate the necessary resources in terms of personnel and infrastructure, and show nurses how the technique can help them improve their workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Kosta Shatrov & Camilla Pessina & Kaspar Huber & Bernhard Thomet & Andreas Gutzeit & Carl Rudolf Blankart, 2021. "Improving health care from the bottom up: Factors for the successful implementation of kaizen in acute care hospitals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0257412
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0257412
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0257412&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0257412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steve New & Mohammed Hadi & Sharon Pickering & Eleanor Robertson & Lauren Morgan & Damian Griffin & Gary Collins & Oliver Rivero-Arias & Ken Catchpole & Peter McCulloch, 2016. "Lean Participative Process Improvement: Outcomes and Obstacles in Trauma Orthopaedics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-13, April.
    2. Lukas D. Filser & Fábio Francisco Silva & Otávio José Oliveira, 2017. "State of research and future research tendencies in lean healthcare: a bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 112(2), pages 799-816, August.
    3. D’Andreamatteo, Antonio & Ianni, Luca & Lega, Federico & Sargiacomo, Massimo, 2015. "Lean in healthcare: A comprehensive review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(9), pages 1197-1209.
    4. Mehdi Farsi & Massimo Filippini, 2008. "Effects of ownership, subsidization and teaching activities on hospital costs in Switzerland," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 335-350, March.
    5. Zoe Radnor & Ruth Boaden, 2008. "Editorial: Lean in Public Services—Panacea or Paradox?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 3-7, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlos Zepeda-Lugo & Diego Tlapa & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Jorge Limon-Romero & Sinue Ontiveros & Armando Perez-Sanchez & Guilherme Tortorella, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of Lean Healthcare on Inpatient Care: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2021. "Assessing lean satisfaction and its enablers: a care provider perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 95-106, June.
    3. Olga Pilipczuk, 2022. "Building the Cognitive Enterprise in the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Federica Centauri & Marta Marsilio & Stefano Villa & Francesco Nicosia, 2016. "Implementare il modello Lean nelle organizzazioni sanitarie: il caso dell?Ospedale Galliera," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(100), pages 27-55.
    5. Abdulaziz M. Almutairi & Mohammed Almanei & Ahmed Al-Ashaab & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2021. "Prioritized Solutions for Overcoming Barriers When Implementing Lean in the Healthcare Supply Chain: A Saudi Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Wen-Hsiang Lai & Hsien-Hui Yang, 2017. "Analyzing Influential Factors of Lean Management," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 20-32, March.
    7. Luigi Siciliani & Peter Sivey & Andrew Street, 2011. "Differences in Length of Stay between Public Hospitals, Treatment Centres and Private Providers: Selection or Efficiency?," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2011n06, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    8. Kuan-Chen Chen & Hong-Ming Chen & Li-Nien Chien & Ming-Miin Yu, 2019. "Productivity growth and quality changes of hospitals in Taiwan: does ownership matter?," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 451-461, September.
    9. Diego Tlapa & Ignacio Franco-Alucano & Jorge Limon-Romero & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Guilherme Tortorella, 2022. "Lean, Six Sigma, and Simulation: Evidence from Healthcare Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Yilong Chen & Yiting Dong & Yu Zeng & Xiaoyan Yang & Jiantong Shen & Lang Zheng & Jingwen Jiang & Liming Pu & Qilin Bao, 2020. "Mapping of diseases from clinical medicine research—a visualization study," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 171-185, October.
    11. Kiran Sharma & Parul Khurana, 2021. "Growth and dynamics of Econophysics: a bibliometric and network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4417-4436, May.
    12. Prattana Punnakitikashem & Philip Hallinger, 2019. "Bibliometric Review of the Knowledge Base on Healthcare Management for Sustainability, 1994–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. John Romley & Erin Trish & Dana Goldman & Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin & Yulei He & Paul Ginsburg, 2019. "Geographic variation in the delivery of high-value inpatient care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-11, March.
    14. Dag Øivind Madsen & Stig Risvik & Tonny Stenheim, 2017. "The diffusion of Lean in the Norwegian municipality sector: An exploratory survey," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1411067-141, January.
    15. Roberto Colombi & Gianmaria Martini & Giorgio Vittadini, 2017. "Determinants of transient and persistent hospital efficiency: The case of Italy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(S2), pages 5-22, September.
    16. Mehdi Farsi & Massimo Filippini & Diego Lunati, 2008. "Economies of Scale and Efficiency Measurement in Switzerland's Nursing Homes," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 144(III), pages 359-378, September.
    17. Peter Zweifel & Philippe K. Widmer, 2023. "Accounting for heterogeneity in the measurement of hospital performance," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(57), pages 6701-6716, December.
    18. Cobelli, Nicola & Cassia, Fabio & Burro, Roberto, 2021. "Factors affecting the choices of adoption/non-adoption of future technologies during coronavirus pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Adnan Ali & Suresh Ramakrishnan & Faisal Faisal & Tooba Akram & Sidra Salam & Sami Ur Rahman, 2023. "Bibliometric analysis of finance and natural resources: past trend, current development, and future prospects," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 13035-13064, November.
    20. Angelo Rosa & Giuliano Marolla & Francesco Zammori, 2018. "Applicazione dello strumento Lean A3 al percorso di presa in carico di pazienti anziani con frattura del femore: il caso studio di un ospedale pugliese," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(106), pages 37-63.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0257412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.