IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0252656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physicians payment in the United States between 2014 and 2018: An analysis of the CMS Open Payments database

Author

Listed:
  • Raphael E Cuomo
  • Mingxiang Cai
  • Neal Shah
  • Tim K Mackey

Abstract

The Open Payments database reports payments made to physicians by industry. Given the potential for financial conflicts of interest relating to patient outcomes, further scrutiny of these data is valuable. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze physician-industry relationships by specialty type, payment type, geospatial trend, and longitudinal trend between 2014–2018. We conducted an observational, retrospective data analysis of payments from the Open Payments database for licensed United States physicians listed in the National Plan & Provider Enumeration System (NPPES). Datasets from 2013–2018 were joined using the Python programming language. Aggregation and sub-setting by characteristics of interest was done in R to calculate means and frequencies of reported general physician payments from industry across different specialties, locations, timeframes, and payment types. Normalization was applied for numbers of physicians or payments. Geospatial statistical hot spot analysis was conducted in ArcGIS. 51.73 million payment records were analyzed. In total, 50,047,930 payments were issued to 771,113 allopathic or osteopathic physicians, representing $8,702,631,264 transferred from industry to physicians over the five-year period between 2014 and 2018. The mean payment amount was $179, with a standard deviation of $12,685. Variability in physicians’ financial relationships with industry were apparent across specialties, regions, time, and payment type. A limited match rate between records in the NPPES and Open Payments databases may have resulted in selection bias of trends related to physician characteristics. Further research is necessary, particularly in the context of changing industry payment trends and public perceptions of the appropriateness of these relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Raphael E Cuomo & Mingxiang Cai & Neal Shah & Tim K Mackey, 2021. "Physicians payment in the United States between 2014 and 2018: An analysis of the CMS Open Payments database," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0252656
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252656
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252656&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0252656?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leila Agha & Dan Zeltzer, 2022. "Drug Diffusion through Peer Networks: The Influence of Industry Payments," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 1-33, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amaral-Garcia, S.;, 2022. "Medical Device Companies and Doctors: Do their interactions affect medical treatments?," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 22/10, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    2. Carey, Colleen & Lieber, Ethan M.J. & Miller, Sarah, 2021. "Drug firms’ payments and physicians’ prescribing behavior in Medicare Part D," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    3. Lawler, Emily C. & Skira, Meghan M., 2022. "Information shocks and pharmaceutical firms’ marketing efforts: Evidence from the Chantix black box warning removal," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Méndez, Susan J. & Scott, Anthony & Zhang, Yuting, 2021. "Gender differences in physician decisions to adopt new prescription drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Sofia Amaral-Garcia, 2020. "Medical Device Companies and Doctors: Do their Interactions Affect Medical Treatments ?," Working Papers ECARES 2020-18, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    6. Ronja Flemming & Franziska Frölich & Norbert Donner‐Banzhoff & Leonie Sundmacher, 2023. "Diffusion of a new drug among ambulatory physicians—The impact of patient pathways," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 970-982, April.
    7. Sebastian Calónico & Rafael Di Tella & Juan Cruz Lopez del Valle, 2023. "The Political Economy of a “Miracle Cure”: The Case of Nebulized Ibuprofen and its Diffusion in Argentina," NBER Working Papers 31781, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. David M. Cutler & J. Travis Donahoe, 2024. "Thick Market Externalities and the Persistence of the Opioid Epidemic," NBER Working Papers 32055, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Avdic, Daniel & Blankart, Katharina, 2021. "A Hard Look at “Soft” Cost‐control Measures in Healthcare Organizations: Evidence from Preferred Drug Policies in Germany," CINCH Working Paper Series (since 2020) 74978, Duisburg-Essen University Library, DuEPublico.
    10. Melissa Newham & Marica Valente, 2022. "The Cost of Influence: How Gifts to Physicians Shape Prescriptions and Drug Costs," Papers 2203.01778, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    11. Joshua L. Krieger & Xuelin Li & Richard T. Thakor, 2022. "Find and Replace: R&D Investment Following the Erosion of Existing Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6552-6571, September.
    12. Avdic, Daniel & Blankart, Katharina, 2021. "A Hard Look at “Soft” Cost‐control Measures in Healthcare Organizations: Evidence from Preferred Drug Policies in Germany," CINCH Working Paper Series (since 2020) 74978, Duisburg-Essen University Library, DuEPublico.
    13. Agostina Brinatti & Xing Guo, 2023. "Third-Country Effects of U.S. Immigration Policy," Staff Working Papers 23-60, Bank of Canada.
    14. Kelli Marquardt & Conor Ryan, 2023. "The Role of Information in Pharmaceutical Advertising: Theory and Evidence," Working Paper Series WP 2023-40, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0252656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.