IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0233810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling workflows: Identifying the most predictive features in healthcare operational processes

Author

Listed:
  • Colm Crowley
  • Steven Guitron
  • Joseph Son
  • Oleg S Pianykh

Abstract

Limited resources and increased patient flow highlight the importance of optimizing healthcare operational systems to improve patient care. Accurate prediction of exam volumes, workflow surges and, most notably, patient delay and wait times are known to have significant impact on quality of care and patient satisfaction. The main objective of this work was to investigate the choice of different operational features to achieve (1) more accurate and concise process models and (2) more effective interventions. To exclude process modelling bias, data from four different workflows was considered, including a mix of walk-in, scheduled, and hybrid facilities. A total of 84 features were computed, based on previous literature and our independent work, all derivable from a typical Hospital Information System. The features were categorized by five subgroups: congestion, customer, resource, task and time features. Two models were used in the feature selection process: linear regression and random forest. Independent of workflow and the model used for selection, it was determined that congestion feature sets lead to models most predictive for operational processes, with a smaller number of predictors.

Suggested Citation

  • Colm Crowley & Steven Guitron & Joseph Son & Oleg S Pianykh, 2020. "Modeling workflows: Identifying the most predictive features in healthcare operational processes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233810
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233810
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233810&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0233810?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo & Itai Gurvich, 2011. "“We Will Be Right with You”: Managing Customer Expectations with Vague Promises and Cheap Talk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1382-1394, December.
    2. Mor Armony & Constantinos Maglaras, 2004. "Contact Centers with a Call-Back Option and Real-Time Delay Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 527-545, August.
    3. Rouba Ibrahim & Ward Whitt, 2011. "Wait-Time Predictors for Customer Service Systems with Time-Varying Demand and Capacity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1106-1118, October.
    4. Oualid Jouini & Zeynep Akşin & Yves Dallery, 2011. "Call Centers with Delay Information: Models and Insights," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 534-548, October.
    5. Oualid Jouini & Zeynep Aksin & Yves Dallery, 2011. "Call Centers with Delay Information: Models and Insights," Post-Print hal-00680769, HAL.
    6. Mor Armony & Nahum Shimkin & Ward Whitt, 2009. "The Impact of Delay Announcements in Many-Server Queues with Abandonment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 66-81, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erjie Ang & Sara Kwasnick & Mohsen Bayati & Erica L. Plambeck & Michael Aratow, 2016. "Accurate Emergency Department Wait Time Prediction," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 141-156, February.
    2. Lu, Yuwei & Xie, Xiaolan & Jiang, Zhibin, 2018. "Dynamic appointment scheduling with wait-dependent abandonment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 975-984.
    3. Rouba Ibrahim & Ward Whitt, 2011. "Wait-Time Predictors for Customer Service Systems with Time-Varying Demand and Capacity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1106-1118, October.
    4. Siddharth Prakash Singh & Mohammad Delasay & Alan Scheller‐Wolf, 2023. "Real‐time delay announcement under competition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 863-881, March.
    5. Rouba Ibrahim, 2018. "Sharing delay information in service systems: a literature survey," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 49-79, June.
    6. Miao Yu & Yu Zhao & Chunguang Chang & Liangliang Sun, 2023. "Fluid models for customer service web chat systems with interactive automated service," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 572-598, June.
    7. Robert J. Batt & Christian Terwiesch, 2015. "Waiting Patiently: An Empirical Study of Queue Abandonment in an Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 39-59, January.
    8. Odysseas Kanavetas & Barış Balcıog̃lu, 2022. "The “Sensitive” Markovian queueing system and its application for a call center problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 317(2), pages 651-664, October.
    9. Kraig Delana & Nicos Savva & Tolga Tezcan, 2021. "Proactive Customer Service: Operational Benefits and Economic Frictions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 70-87, 1-2.
    10. Sophia Novitzky & Jamol Pender & Richard H. Rand & Elizabeth Wesson, 2020. "Limiting the oscillations in queues with delayed information through a novel type of delay announcement," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 281-330, August.
    11. Zeynep Akşin & Barış Ata & Seyed Morteza Emadi & Che-Lin Su, 2013. "Structural Estimation of Callers' Delay Sensitivity in Call Centers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(12), pages 2727-2746, December.
    12. Zeynep Akşin & Baris Ata & Seyed Morteza Emadi & Che-Lin Su, 2017. "Impact of Delay Announcements in Call Centers: An Empirical Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 242-265, February.
    13. Junfei Huang & Avishai Mandelbaum & Hanqin Zhang & Jiheng Zhang, 2017. "Refined Models for Efficiency-Driven Queues with Applications to Delay Announcements and Staffing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1380-1397, October.
    14. Jamol Pender & Richard Rand & Elizabeth Wesson, 2020. "A Stochastic Analysis of Queues with Customer Choice and Delayed Information," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 1104-1126, August.
    15. Philipp Afèche & Opher Baron & Yoav Kerner, 2013. "Pricing Time-Sensitive Services Based on Realized Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 492-506, July.
    16. Shone, Rob & Knight, Vincent A. & Williams, Janet E., 2013. "Comparisons between observable and unobservable M/M/1 queues with respect to optimal customer behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 133-141.
    17. Qiuping Yu & Gad Allon & Achal Bassamboo, 2017. "How Do Delay Announcements Shape Customer Behavior? An Empirical Study," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 1-20, January.
    18. Oualid Jouini & Zeynep Akşin & Yves Dallery, 2011. "Call Centers with Delay Information: Models and Insights," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 534-548, October.
    19. Ozan Candogan & Kimon Drakopoulos, 2020. "Optimal Signaling of Content Accuracy: Engagement vs. Misinformation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 497-515, March.
    20. Benevento, Elisabetta & Aloini, Davide & Squicciarini, Nunzia, 2023. "Towards a real-time prediction of waiting times in emergency departments: A comparative analysis of machine learning techniques," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 192-208.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0233810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.