IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0212636.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Variable weights theory and its application to multi-attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers on determining decision maker’s weights

Author

Listed:
  • Sen Liu
  • Wei Yu
  • Ling Liu
  • Yanan Hu

Abstract

The determination of the weights of decision makers (DMs) is an important problem in multi-attribute group decision making. Many approaches have been presented to determine DMs’ weights. However, the computed weight vectors of DMs are usually assumed to be constant in existing studies, and this may cause irrationalities in the decision results. Therefore, this article proposes a novel method to determine DMs’ weights based on variable weights theory in which the evaluation information is described as intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs). First, DMs provide their assessment with IFSs, and the intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging (IFWA) operator is applied to obtain weighted decision matrix based on the prior given DMs’ and attributes’ weights. Second, the DMs’ weights are obtained based on variable weights theory, and an alternative decision can be computed. Finally, the converted value of the achieved IFS of each alternative is calculated, and the best appropriate alternative is acquired. Two illustrative examples and the comparisons with exsiting approaches are also used to reflect the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Sen Liu & Wei Yu & Ling Liu & Yanan Hu, 2019. "Variable weights theory and its application to multi-attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers on determining decision maker’s weights," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0212636
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0212636
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0212636&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0212636?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong, Qingxing & Cooper, Orrin, 2016. "A peer-to-peer dynamic adaptive consensus reaching model for the group AHP decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 521-530.
    2. Zeshui Xu, 2010. "A Deviation-Based Approach to Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 57-76, January.
    3. Li, Yang & Wang, Jinlong & Zhao, Dongbo & Li, Guoqing & Chen, Chen, 2018. "A two-stage approach for combined heat and power economic emission dispatch: Combining multi-objective optimization with integrated decision making," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 237-254.
    4. Eklund, Patrik & Rusinowska, Agnieszka & De Swart, Harrie, 2007. "Consensus reaching in committees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 185-193, April.
    5. Qin, Jindong & Liu, Xinwang & Pedrycz, Witold, 2017. "An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 626-638.
    6. Horace W. Brock, 1980. "The Problem of “Utility Weights” in Group Preference Aggregation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 176-187, February.
    7. Ramanathan, R. & Ganesh, L. S., 1994. "Group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: An evaluation and an intrinsic process for deriving members' weightages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 79(2), pages 249-265, December.
    8. Samuel E. Bodily, 1979. "Note--A Delegation Process for Combining Individual Utility Functions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(10), pages 1035-1041, October.
    9. Wan, Shuping & Wang, Feng & Dong, Jiuying, 2017. "Additive consistent interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation and likelihood comparison algorithm based group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 571-582.
    10. Dariush Khezrimotlagh & Yao Chen, 2018. "The Optimization Approach," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Decision Making and Performance Evaluation Using Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 107-134, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zunhao Luo & Zexin Li, 2019. "A MAGDM Method Based on Possibility Distribution Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set and Its Application," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-32, November.
    2. Weidong Zhu & Shaorong Li & Hongtao Zhang & Tianjiao Zhang & Zhimin Li, 2022. "Evaluation of scientific research projects on the basis of evidential reasoning approach under the perspective of expert reliability," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 275-298, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zeshui Xu & Xiaoqiang Cai, 2012. "Minimizing Group Discordance Optimization Model for Deriving Expert Weights," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 863-875, November.
    2. Zeshui Xu & Xiaoqiang Cai, 2013. "On Consensus of Group Decision Making with Interval Utility Values and Interval Preference Orderings," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 997-1019, November.
    3. Gong, Zaiwu & Guo, Weiwei & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique & Gong, Zejun & Wei, Guo, 2020. "Consistency and consensus modeling of linear uncertain preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 290-307.
    4. Changyu Zhou & Guohe Huang & Jiapei Chen, 2019. "A Type-2 Fuzzy Chance-Constrained Fractional Integrated Modeling Method for Energy System Management of Uncertainties and Risks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Li, Yang & Wang, Bin & Yang, Zhen & Li, Jiazheng & Chen, Chen, 2022. "Hierarchical stochastic scheduling of multi-community integrated energy systems in uncertain environments via Stackelberg game," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    6. Kumar Jadoun, Vinay & Rahul Prashanth, G & Suhas Joshi, Siddharth & Narayanan, K. & Malik, Hasmat & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro, 2022. "Optimal fuzzy based economic emission dispatch of combined heat and power units using dynamically controlled Whale Optimization Algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    7. Li, Yang & Yang, Zhen & Li, Guoqing & Mu, Yunfei & Zhao, Dongbo & Chen, Chen & Shen, Bo, 2018. "Optimal scheduling of isolated microgrid with an electric vehicle battery swapping station in multi-stakeholder scenarios: A bi-level programming approach via real-time pricing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 54-68.
    8. Qiang Yang & Ping-an Du & Yong Wang & Bin Liang, 2017. "A rough set approach for determining weights of decision makers in group decision making," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Henrique Pires Corrêa & Rafael Ribeiro de Carvalho Vaz & Flávio Henrique Teles Vieira & Sérgio Granato de Araújo, 2019. "Reliability Based Genetic Algorithm Applied to Allocation of Fiber Optics Links for Power Grid Automation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, May.
    10. Muhammad Faisal Shehzad & Mainak Dan & Valerio Mariani & Seshadhri Srinivasan & Davide Liuzza & Carmine Mongiello & Roberto Saraceno & Luigi Glielmo, 2021. "A Heuristic Algorithm for Combined Heat and Power System Operation Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Simon Pezzutto & Giulio Quaglini & Andrea Zambito & Antonio Novelli & Philippe Riviere & Lukas Kranzl & Eric Wilczynski, 2022. "Potential Evolution of the Cooling Market in the EU27+UK: An Outlook until 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, April.
    12. Wu, Xingli & Liao, Huchang, 2019. "A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1017-1027.
    13. Li, Yang & Wang, Ruinong & Li, Yuanzheng & Zhang, Meng & Long, Chao, 2023. "Wind power forecasting considering data privacy protection: A federated deep reinforcement learning approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 329(C).
    14. Li, Yang & Han, Meng & Shahidehpour, Mohammad & Li, Jiazheng & Long, Chao, 2023. "Data-driven distributionally robust scheduling of community integrated energy systems with uncertain renewable generations considering integrated demand response," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    15. Khaled Jabeur & Jean-Marc Martel & Slim Ben Khélifa, 2004. "A Distance-Based Collective Preorder Integrating the Relative Importance of the Group's Members," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 327-349, July.
    16. Sayantan Mitra & Sriparna Saha, 2019. "A multiobjective multi-view cluster ensemble technique: Application in patient subclassification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-30, May.
    17. Jahangir Wasim & Vijay Vyas & Pietro Amenta & Antonio Lucadamo & Gabriella Marcarelli & Alessio Ishizaka, 2023. "Deriving the weights for aggregating judgments in a multi-group problem: an application to curriculum development in entrepreneurship," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 853-877, July.
    18. Jingliang Jin & Qinglan Wen & Xianyue Zhang & Siqi Cheng & Xiaojun Guo, 2021. "Economic Emission Dispatch for Wind Power Integrated System with Carbon Trading Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Hossam M J Mustafa & Masri Ayob & Mohd Zakree Ahmad Nazri & Graham Kendall, 2019. "An improved adaptive memetic differential evolution optimization algorithms for data clustering problems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, May.
    20. Ragab El-Sehiemy & Abdullah Shaheen & Ahmed Ginidi & Mostafa Elhosseini, 2022. "A Honey Badger Optimization for Minimizing the Pollutant Environmental Emissions-Based Economic Dispatch Model Integrating Combined Heat and Power Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0212636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.