IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0204975.html

Forensic analysis of Turkish elections in 2017–2018

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Klimek
  • Raúl Jiménez
  • Manuel Hidalgo
  • Abraham Hinteregger
  • Stefan Thurner

Abstract

With a majority of ‘Yes’ votes in the Constitutional Referendum of 2017, Turkey continued its drift towards an autocracy. By the will of the Turkish people, this referendum transferred practically all executive power to president Erdoğan. However, the referendum was confronted with a substantial number of allegations of electoral misconducts and irregularities, ranging from state coercion of ‘No’ supporters to the controversial validity of unstamped ballots. Here we report the results of an election forensic analysis of recent Turkish elections to clarify to what extent it is plausible that these voting irregularities were present and able to influence the outcome of the referendum. We apply statistical forensics tests to identify the specific nature of the alleged electoral malpractices. In particular, we test whether the data contains fingerprints for ballot stuffing (submission of multiple ballots per person during the vote) and voter rigging (coercion and intimidation of voters). Additionally, we perform tests to identify numerical anomalies in the election results. For the 2017 Constitutional Referendum we find systematic and highly significant statistical support for the presence of both ballot stuffing and voter rigging. In 11% of stations we find signs for ballot stuffing with a standard deviation (uncertainty of ballot stuffing probability) of 2.7% (4 sigma event). Removing such ballot-stuffing-characteristic anomalies from the data would tip the overall balance from ‘No’ to a majority of ‘Yes’ votes. The 2017 election was followed by early elections in 2018 to directly vote for a new president who would now be head of state and government. We find statistical irregularities in the 2018 presidential and parliamentary elections similar in size and direction to those in 2017. These findings validate that our results unveil systematic and potentially even fraudulent biases that require further attention in order to combat electoral malpractices.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Klimek & Raúl Jiménez & Manuel Hidalgo & Abraham Hinteregger & Stefan Thurner, 2018. "Forensic analysis of Turkish elections in 2017–2018," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204975
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204975
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204975&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0204975?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rozenas, Arturas, 2017. "Detecting Election Fraud from Irregularities in Vote-Share Distributions," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(1), pages 41-56, January.
    2. Berk Esen & Sebnem Gumuscu, 2016. "Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 1581-1606, September.
    3. Montgomery, Jacob M. & Olivella, Santiago & Potter, Joshua D. & Crisp, Brian F., 2015. "An Informed Forensics Approach to Detecting Vote Irregularities," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 488-505.
    4. Beber, Bernd & Scacco, Alexandra, 2012. "What the Numbers Say: A Digit-Based Test for Election Fraud," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 211-234, April.
    5. Cantú, Francisco & Saiegh, Sebastián M., 2011. "Fraudulent Democracy? An Analysis of Argentina's Infamous Decade Using Supervised Machine Learning," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 409-433.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christoph Koenig, 2024. "With a Little Help From the Crowd: Estimating Election Fraud with Forensic Methods," CEIS Research Paper 584, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 28 Oct 2024.
    2. Peter Klimek & Ahmet Aykaç & Stefan Thurner, 2023. "Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Casas, Agustín & Díaz, Guillermo & Trindade, André, 2017. "Who monitors the monitor? Effect of party observers on electoral outcomes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 136-149.
    4. Koenig, Christoph, 2019. "Patronage and Election Fraud: Insights from Russia’s Governors 2000–2012," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 433, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    5. Marius Jula, 2015. "Using R for Identification of Data Inconsistency in Electoral Models," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 63(3), pages 101-108, September.
    6. Özgür Orhangazi & A. Erinç Yeldan, 2021. "The Re‐making of the Turkish Crisis," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 460-503, May.
    7. Garoupa, Nuno & Spruk, Rok, 2025. "Populist constitutional backsliding and judicial independence: Evidence from Türkiye," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Callais, Justin T. & Mkrtchian, Gor, 2024. "Court-packing and judicial manipulation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Christopher Blattman & Horacio Larreguy & Benjamin Marx & Otis Reid, 2019. "Eat Widely, Vote Wisely ? Lessons from a Campaign Against Vote Buying in Uganda," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03608420, HAL.
    10. Eric Zitzewitz, 2012. "Forensic Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 50(3), pages 731-769, September.
    11. Poulsen, Jonas, 2013. "After Apartheid: The Effects of ANC Power," Working Paper Series, Center for Fiscal Studies 2013:10, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    12. Selin Çağatay, 2018. "Women’s Coalitions beyond the Laicism–Islamism Divide in Turkey: Towards an Inclusive Struggle for Gender Equality?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 48-58.
    13. Michael Callen & James D. Long, 2015. "Institutional Corruption and Election Fraud: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(1), pages 354-381, January.
    14. Benjamin Crost & Joseph H Felter & Hani Mansour & Daniel I Rees, 0. "Narrow Incumbent Victories and Post-Election Conflict: Evidence from the Philippines," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 34(3), pages 767-789.
    15. Anthony J. Evans, 2024. "Competitive authoritarianism, informational authoritarianism, and the development of dictatorship: a case study of Belarus," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 198(3), pages 343-360, March.
    16. Koenig, Christoph, "undated". "Competence vs. Loyalty: Political survival and electoral fraud in Russia’s regions 2000–2012," Economic Research Papers 270014, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    17. Kelly Morrison & Daniela Donno & Burcu Savun & Perisa Davutoglu, 2025. "Competing judgments: Multiple election observers and post-election contention," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 293-321, June.
    18. Senem Aydın‐Düzgit & Gergana Noutcheva, 2022. "External Contestations of Europe: Russia and Turkey as Normative Challengers?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1815-1831, November.
    19. Lukas Linek & Michael Skvrnak & Michal Soltes & Vitezslav Titl, 2024. "Czech Political Candidate and Donation Datasets," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp790, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    20. Hazama,Yasushi, 2023. "Welfare, Corruption, and the Economic Vote of Punishment: The Turkish Case," IDE Discussion Papers 908, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.