IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0202788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning zero-cost portfolio selection with pattern matching

Author

Listed:
  • Fayyaaz Loonat
  • Tim Gebbie

Abstract

We replicate and extend the adversarial expert based learning approach of Györfi et al to the situation of zero-cost portfolio selection implemented with a quadratic approximation derived from the mutual fund separation theorems. The algorithm is applied to daily sampled sequential Open-High-Low-Close data and sequential intraday 5-minute bar-data from the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). Statistical tests of the algorithms are considered. The algorithms are directly compared to standard NYSE test cases from prior literature. The learning algorithm is used to select parameters for experts generated by pattern matching past dynamics using a simple nearest-neighbour search algorithm. It is shown that there is a speed advantage associated with using an analytic solution of the mutual fund separation theorems. We argue that the strategies are on the boundary of profitability when considered in the context of their application to intraday quantitative trading but demonstrate that patterns in financial time-series on the JSE could be systematically exploited in collective and that they are persistent in the data investigated. We do not suggest that the strategies can be profitably implemented but argue that these types of patterns may exists for either structural of implementation cost reasons.

Suggested Citation

  • Fayyaaz Loonat & Tim Gebbie, 2018. "Learning zero-cost portfolio selection with pattern matching," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-38, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0202788
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202788
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202788&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0202788?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diane Wilcox & Tim Gebbie, 2008. "Serial Correlation, Periodicity And Scaling Of Eigenmodes In An Emerging Market," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(07), pages 739-760.
    2. Jason E. Cross & Andrew R. Barron, 2003. "Efficient Universal Portfolios for Past‐Dependent Target Classes," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 245-276, April.
    3. D. Hendricks & T. Gebbie & D. Wilcox, 2016. "Detecting intraday financial market states using temporal clustering," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(11), pages 1657-1678, November.
    4. Jim Gatheral, 2010. "No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(7), pages 749-759.
    5. Jarrow, Robert & Teo, Melvyn & Tse, Yiu Kuen & Warachka, Mitch, 2012. "An improved test for statistical arbitrage," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 47-80.
    6. Tim Gebbie & Fayyaaz Loonat, 2016. "Learning zero-cost portfolio selection with pattern matching," Papers 1605.04600, arXiv.org.
    7. László Györfi & András Urbán & István Vajda, 2007. "Kernel-Based Semi-Log-Optimal Empirical Portfolio Selection Strategies," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 10(03), pages 505-516.
    8. Györfi László & Udina Frederic & Walk Harro, 2008. "Nonparametric nearest neighbor based empirical portfolio selection strategies," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 26(2), pages 145-157, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tim Gebbie & Fayyaaz Loonat, 2016. "Learning zero-cost portfolio selection with pattern matching," Papers 1605.04600, arXiv.org.
    2. Vajda, István & Ottucsák, György, 2006. "Empirikus portfólióstratégiák [Empirical portfolio strategies]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 624-640.
    3. Bin Li & Steven C. H. Hoi, 2012. "Online Portfolio Selection: A Survey," Papers 1212.2129, arXiv.org, revised May 2013.
    4. Olivier Guéant & Charles-Albert Lehalle, 2015. "General Intensity Shapes In Optimal Liquidation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 457-495, July.
    5. Jin’an He & Shicheng Yin & Fangping Peng, 2024. "Weak aggregating specialist algorithm for online portfolio selection," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(6), pages 2405-2434, June.
    6. Fengpei Li & Vitalii Ihnatiuk & Ryan Kinnear & Anderson Schneider & Yuriy Nevmyvaka, 2022. "Do price trajectory data increase the efficiency of market impact estimation?," Papers 2205.13423, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    7. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Alexander Schied & Florian Klock, 2013. "Multivariate transient price impact and matrix-valued positive definite functions," Papers 1310.4471, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    8. Thibault Jaisson, 2014. "Market impact as anticipation of the order flow imbalance," Papers 1402.1288, arXiv.org.
    9. Svitlana Vyetrenko & David Byrd & Nick Petosa & Mahmoud Mahfouz & Danial Dervovic & Manuela Veloso & Tucker Hybinette Balch, 2019. "Get Real: Realism Metrics for Robust Limit Order Book Market Simulations," Papers 1912.04941, arXiv.org.
    10. Man Yiu Tsang & Tony Sit & Hoi Ying Wong, 2022. "Adaptive Robust Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2206.01064, arXiv.org.
    11. Steven Campbell & Marcel Nutz, 2025. "Randomization in Optimal Execution Games," Papers 2503.08833, arXiv.org.
    12. J. Doyne Farmer & Austin Gerig & Fabrizio Lillo & Henri Waelbroeck, 2013. "How efficiency shapes market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(11), pages 1743-1758, November.
    13. Martin D. Gould & Mason A. Porter & Stacy Williams & Mark McDonald & Daniel J. Fenn & Sam D. Howison, 2010. "Limit Order Books," Papers 1012.0349, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2013.
    14. Thierry Roncalli & Amina Cherief & Fatma Karray-Meziou & Margaux Regnault, 2021. "Liquidity Stress Testing in Asset Management -- Part 2. Modeling the Asset Liquidity Risk," Papers 2105.08377, arXiv.org.
    15. Ahmet G�nc�, 2015. "Statistical arbitrage in the Black-Scholes framework," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(9), pages 1489-1499, September.
    16. Hyoeun Lee & Kiseop Lee, 2020. "Optimal execution with liquidity risk in a diffusive order book market," Papers 2004.10951, arXiv.org.
    17. Fabio Caccioli & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & J. Doyne Farmer, 2012. "A proposal for impact-adjusted valuation: Critical leverage and execution risk," Papers 1204.0922, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2012.
    18. Olivier Gu'eant, 2013. "Permanent market impact can be nonlinear," Papers 1305.0413, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2014.
    19. Ha, Youngmin & Zhang, Hai, 2020. "Algorithmic trading for online portfolio selection under limited market liquidity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1033-1051.
    20. Emilio Said, 2022. "Market Impact: Empirical Evidence, Theory and Practice," Working Papers hal-03668669, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0202788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.