IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0154845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mothers Make a Difference: Mothers Develop Weaker Bonds with Immature Sons than Daughters

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Kulik
  • Doreen Langos
  • Anja Widdig

Abstract

Among mammals, individuals form strong social bonds preferentially with their kin. Differences in these relationships are linked to differential kin availability due to sex-specific dispersal patterns, but there is some indication that differential bonding among sexes already occurs prior to maturation. However, little is known about how these patterns arise during individual development. Here we investigated sex differences in the development of mother-offspring bonds in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Our results revealed that mothers showed sex-biased bonding toward their offspring. Sons had a distinctly higher probability of receiving aggression from their mothers than did daughters in the first year of life, while no differences were found with respect to affiliative interactions. After the first year, probabilities of all affiliative and aggressive behaviours investigated were higher for daughters than for sons, although generally declining. Furthermore, sons spending less time with their mother and receiving more maternal aggression tended to disperse earlier. The results of our study suggest that mothers influence their bonding strength with offspring by interacting less affiliative with sons than daughters.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Kulik & Doreen Langos & Anja Widdig, 2016. "Mothers Make a Difference: Mothers Develop Weaker Bonds with Immature Sons than Daughters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0154845
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0154845
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0154845&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0154845?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holger Schielzeth & Wolfgang Forstmeier, 2009. "Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(2), pages 416-420.
    2. Tim Clutton-Brock, 2009. "Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies," Nature, Nature, vol. 462(7269), pages 51-57, November.
    3. O. P. Höner & B. Wachter & M. L. East & W. J. Streich & K. Wilhelm & T. Burke & H. Hofer, 2007. "Female mate-choice drives the evolution of male-biased dispersal in a social mammal," Nature, Nature, vol. 448(7155), pages 798-801, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Som B Ale & Joel S Brown & Amy T Sullivan, 2013. "Evolution of Cooperation: Combining Kin Selection and Reciprocal Altruism into Matrix Games with Social Dilemmas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-8, May.
    2. Andrés López-Sepulcre & Sebastiano De Bona & Janne K. Valkonen & Kate D.L. Umbers & Johanna Mappes, 2015. "Item Response Trees: a recommended method for analyzing categorical data in behavioral studies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1268-1273.
    3. Schimit, P.H.T. & Santos, B.O. & Soares, C.A., 2015. "Evolution of cooperation in Axelrod tournament using cellular automata," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 437(C), pages 204-217.
    4. Gao, Lei & Li, Yaotang & Wang, Zhen & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2022. "Asymmetric strategy setup solve the Prisoner’s Dilemma of the evolution of mutualism," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 412(C).
    5. Zhu, Jiabao & Liu, Xingwen, 2021. "The number of strategy changes can be used to promote cooperation in spatial snowdrift game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 575(C).
    6. Hammerstein, Peter & Leimar, Olof, 2015. "Evolutionary Game Theory in Biology," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    7. Dirk Helbing & Anders Johansson, 2010. "Cooperation, Norms, and Revolutions: A Unified Game-Theoretical Approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Mohammad Salahshour, 2021. "Freedom to choose between public resources promotes cooperation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Paganelli, Maria Pia, 2011. "The same face of the two Smiths: Adam Smith and Vernon Smith," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 246-255, May.
    10. Caleb R. Hickman & James I. Watling, 2014. "Leachates from an invasive shrub causes risk-prone behavior in a larval amphibian," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(2), pages 300-305.
    11. Hannes Rusch & Max Albert, 2013. "Indirect Reciprocity, Golden Opportunities for Defection, and Inclusive Reputation," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201329, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    12. Markus Port & Rufus A. Johnstone & Peter M. Kappeler, 2012. "The evolution of multimale groups in Verreaux's sifaka, or how to test an evolutionary demographic model," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 889-897.
    13. Joseph Bozorgmehr, 2012. "Natural selection as a paradigm of opportunism in biology," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 61-75, April.
    14. Matthew Chennells & Mateusz Woźniak & Stephen Butterfill & John Michael, 2022. "Coordinated decision-making boosts altruistic motivation—But not trust," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Benjamin M Zagorsky & Johannes G Reiter & Krishnendu Chatterjee & Martin A Nowak, 2013. "Forgiver Triumphs in Alternating Prisoner's Dilemma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Kaare B Mikkelsen & Lars A Bach, 2016. "Threshold Games and Cooperation on Multiplayer Graphs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, February.
    17. Maxwell N Burton-Chellew & Stuart A West, 2012. "Correlates of Cooperation in a One-Shot High-Stakes Televised Prisoners' Dilemma," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-10, April.
    18. Zhang, Jing & Li, Zhao & Zhang, Jiqiang & Ma, Lin & Zheng, Guozhong & Chen, Li, 2023. "Emergence of oscillatory cooperation in a population with incomplete information," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 617(C).
    19. Daniela Campobello & Maurizio Sarà & James F. Hare, 2012. "Under my wing: lesser kestrels and jackdaws derive reciprocal benefits in mixed-species colonies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 425-433.
    20. repec:plo:pone00:0161133 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Sergio Beraldo, 2015. "On the economic relevance of the principle of gratuitousness," International Journal of Happiness and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3), pages 204-215.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0154845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.