IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i2p300-305..html

Leachates from an invasive shrub causes risk-prone behavior in a larval amphibian

Author

Listed:
  • Caleb R. Hickman
  • James I. Watling

Abstract

Invasive plants influence the quality of habitats they invade by transforming the physical structure of forests and changing the chemical composition of aquatic environments. Prey may accept higher predation risk as they manage lower quality environments caused by invasive plants. Leachates from invasive Amur honeysuckle cause American toad tadpoles to swim to the surface, which may alter typical antipredator freezing behaviors and expose tadpoles to detection by predators. We use a factorial laboratory experiment to condition individual tadpoles to leaf leachates made from honeysuckle, native trees, or a water control followed by exposure to experimental arenas with one of 3 chemical cues (2 predator species or control water). Toad tadpoles increased their latency to move (freezing) and had a lower total movement to predator cues. In contrast, latency to move was faster in response to honeysuckle leachates, but leaf leachates had no influence on total movement activity. Tadpoles did not change surfacing frequency to predator cues but increased surfacing to honeysuckle leachate. The combined effect of predator cue and leachate treatment had no influence on behaviors. Although honeysuckle leachate is stressful to toad tadpoles, increased surfacing does not preclude the exhibition of typical antipredator behaviors (decreased movement). However, honeysuckle induced a risk-prone response of increased surfacing, even in the presence of predator cues. As tadpoles endure physiological costs from honeysuckle, they may suffer elevated exposure to detection by predators. Our work provides insight into how invasive plants may have indirect effects on native communities by altering animal behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Caleb R. Hickman & James I. Watling, 2014. "Leachates from an invasive shrub causes risk-prone behavior in a larval amphibian," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(2), pages 300-305.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:300-305.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/art121
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holger Schielzeth & Wolfgang Forstmeier, 2009. "Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(2), pages 416-420.
    2. Evan L Preisser & Daniel I Bolnick, 2008. "The Many Faces of Fear: Comparing the Pathways and Impacts of Nonconsumptive Predator Effects on Prey Populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-8, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dubey, Balram & Sajan, & Kumar, Ankit, 2021. "Stability switching and chaos in a multiple delayed prey–predator model with fear effect and anti-predator behavior," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 164-192.
    2. Andrés López-Sepulcre & Sebastiano De Bona & Janne K. Valkonen & Kate D.L. Umbers & Johanna Mappes, 2015. "Item Response Trees: a recommended method for analyzing categorical data in behavioral studies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1268-1273.
    3. Roy, Jyotirmoy & Alam, Shariful, 2020. "Fear factor in a prey–predator system in deterministic and stochastic environment," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 541(C).
    4. Liu, Junli & Liu, Bairu & Lv, Pan & Zhang, Tailei, 2021. "An eco-epidemiological model with fear effect and hunting cooperation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    5. Thirthar, Ashraf Adnan & Majeed, Salam J. & Alqudah, Manar A. & Panja, Prabir & Abdeljawad, Thabet, 2022. "Fear effect in a predator-prey model with additional food, prey refuge and harvesting on super predator," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Tiwari, Vandana & Tripathi, Jai Prakash & Mishra, Swati & Upadhyay, Ranjit Kumar, 2020. "Modeling the fear effect and stability of non-equilibrium patterns in mutually interfering predator–prey systems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 371(C).
    7. Yangyang Su & Tongqian Zhang, 2022. "Global Dynamics of a Predator–Prey Model with Fear Effect and Impulsive State Feedback Control," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Charline Couchoux & Jeanne Clermont & Dany Garant & Denis Réale & Jonathan PruittHandling editor, 2018. "Signaler and receiver boldness influence response to alarm calls in eastern chipmunks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 212-220.
    9. Seralan Vinoth & R. Vadivel & Nien-Tsu Hu & Chin-Sheng Chen & Nallappan Gunasekaran, 2023. "Bifurcation Analysis in a Harvested Modified Leslie–Gower Model Incorporated with the Fear Factor and Prey Refuge," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-25, July.
    10. Saha, Sangeeta & Pal, Swadesh & Melnik, Roderick, 2025. "Analysis of the impact of fear in the presence of additional food and prey refuge with nonlocal predator–prey models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 505(C).
    11. Mu, Yu & Lo, Wing-Cheong & Tan, Yuanshun & Liu, Zijian, 2025. "Hybrid control for the prey in a spatial prey-predator model with cooperative hunting and fear effect time lag," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 491(C).
    12. Das, Meghadri & Samanta, G.P., 2020. "A delayed fractional order food chain model with fear effect and prey refuge," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 218-245.
    13. Mukherjee, Debasis, 2020. "Role of fear in predator–prey system with intraspecific competition," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 263-275.
    14. repec:plo:pone00:0197230 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Kumbhakar, Ruma & Hossain, Mainul & Pal, Nikhil, 2024. "Dynamics of a two-prey one-predator model with fear and group defense: A study in parameter planes," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Matthew Chennells & Mateusz Woźniak & Stephen Butterfill & John Michael, 2022. "Coordinated decision-making boosts altruistic motivation—But not trust," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Sahu, S.R. & Raw, S.N., 2023. "Appearance of chaos and bi-stability in a fear induced delayed predator–prey system: A mathematical modeling study," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    18. Yousef, Fatma Bozkurt & Yousef, Ali & Maji, Chandan, 2021. "Effects of fear in a fractional-order predator-prey system with predator density-dependent prey mortality," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    19. repec:plo:pone00:0161133 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Narayan Mondal & Dipesh Barman & Shariful Alam, 2021. "Impact of adult predator incited fear in a stage-structured prey–predator model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9280-9307, June.
    21. Laura A. B. Wilson & Susanne R. K. Zajitschek & Malgorzata Lagisz & Jeremy Mason & Hamed Haselimashhadi & Shinichi Nakagawa, 2022. "Sex differences in allometry for phenotypic traits in mice indicate that females are not scaled males," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    22. Paula Hidalgo-Rodríguez & Pedro Sáez-Gómez & Julio Blas & Anders Hedenström & Carlos Camacho, 2021. "Body mass dynamics of migratory nightjars are explained by individual turnover and fueling," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1086-1093.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:2:p:300-305.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.