IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0090873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Segmentation of Neuronal Structures Using SARSA (λ)-Based Boundary Amendment with Reinforced Gradient-Descent Curve Shape Fitting

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Zhu
  • Quan Liu
  • Yuchen Fu
  • Bairong Shen

Abstract

The segmentation of structures in electron microscopy (EM) images is very important for neurobiological research. The low resolution neuronal EM images contain noise and generally few features are available for segmentation, therefore application of the conventional approaches to identify the neuron structure from EM images is not successful. We therefore present a multi-scale fused structure boundary detection algorithm in this study. In the algorithm, we generate an EM image Gaussian pyramid first, then at each level of the pyramid, we utilize Laplacian of Gaussian function (LoG) to attain structure boundary, we finally assemble the detected boundaries by using fusion algorithm to attain a combined neuron structure image. Since the obtained neuron structures usually have gaps, we put forward a reinforcement learning-based boundary amendment method to connect the gaps in the detected boundaries. We use a SARSA (λ)-based curve traveling and amendment approach derived from reinforcement learning to repair the incomplete curves. Using this algorithm, a moving point starts from one end of the incomplete curve and walks through the image where the decisions are supervised by the approximated curve model, with the aim of minimizing the connection cost until the gap is closed. Our approach provided stable and efficient structure segmentation. The test results using 30 EM images from ISBI 2012 indicated that both of our approaches, i.e., with or without boundary amendment, performed better than six conventional boundary detection approaches. In particular, after amendment, the Rand error and warping error, which are the most important performance measurements during structure segmentation, were reduced to very low values. The comparison with the benchmark method of ISBI 2012 and the recent developed methods also indicates that our method performs better for the accurate identification of substructures in EM images and therefore useful for the identification of imaging features related to brain diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Zhu & Quan Liu & Yuchen Fu & Bairong Shen, 2014. "Segmentation of Neuronal Structures Using SARSA (λ)-Based Boundary Amendment with Reinforced Gradient-Descent Curve Shape Fitting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0090873
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0090873
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0090873&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0090873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucas D Eggert & Jens Sommer & Andreas Jansen & Tilo Kircher & Carsten Konrad, 2012. "Accuracy and Reliability of Automated Gray Matter Segmentation Pathways on Real and Simulated Structural Magnetic Resonance Images of the Human Brain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-9, September.
    2. Stephen M Plaza & Louis K Scheffer & Mathew Saunders, 2012. "Minimizing Manual Image Segmentation Turn-Around Time for Neuronal Reconstruction by Embracing Uncertainty," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Michael Buckland & Fredric Gey, 1994. "The relationship between Recall and Precision," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 45(1), pages 12-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Fan & Bales, Chris & Fleyeh, Hasan, 2021. "Night setback identification of district heat substations using bidirectional long short term memory with attention mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Matthew J. Jacobson, 2022. "Archaeological Evidence for Community Resilience and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Quantitative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Sanjay K. Arora & Alan L. Porter & Jan Youtie & Philip Shapira, 2013. "Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 95(1), pages 351-370, April.
    4. Zeqing Yang & Mingxuan Zhang & Yingshu Chen & Ning Hu & Lingxiao Gao & Libing Liu & Enxu Ping & Jung Il Song, 2024. "Surface defect detection method for air rudder based on positive samples," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 95-113, January.
    5. Juan Nunez-Iglesias & Ryan Kennedy & Toufiq Parag & Jianbo Shi & Dmitri B Chklovskii, 2013. "Machine Learning of Hierarchical Clustering to Segment 2D and 3D Images," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-11, August.
    6. Martin Wieland & Juan Gorraiz, 2020. "The rivalry between Bernini and Borromini from a scientometric perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(2), pages 1643-1663, November.
    7. Matteo Manca & Ludovico Boratto & Salvatore Carta, 2018. "Behavioral data mining to produce novel and serendipitous friend recommendations in a social bookmarking system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 825-839, August.
    8. Ngoc Uyen Phuong Nguyen & Martin G. Moehrle, 2019. "Technological Drivers of Urban Innovation: A T-DNA Analysis Based on US Patent Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Matteo Manca & Ludovico Boratto & Salvatore Carta, 0. "Behavioral data mining to produce novel and serendipitous friend recommendations in a social bookmarking system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    10. Mohammed Sabbih Hamoud Al-Tamimi & Ghazali Sulong, 2015. "A New Method for Detecting Cerebral Tissues Abnormality in Magnetic Resonance Images," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(8), pages 354-354, August.
    11. Suner Aslı, 2019. "Clustering methods for single-cell RNA-sequencing expression data: performance evaluation with varying sample sizes and cell compositions," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, October.
    12. Parraguez, Pedro & Škec, Stanko & e Carmo, Duarte Oliveira & Maier, Anja, 2020. "Quantifying technological change as a combinatorial process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    13. Chris Davis & Graham Aid, 2022. "Machine learning‐assisted industrial symbiosis: Testing the ability of word vectors to estimate similarity for material substitutions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(1), pages 27-43, February.
    14. Madhusudanan Navinchandran & Michael E. Sharp & Michael P. Brundage & Thurston B. Sexton, 2022. "Discovering critical KPI factors from natural language in maintenance work orders," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 1859-1877, August.
    15. Izaskun Alvarez-Meaza & Enara Zarrabeitia-Bilbao & Rosa Maria Rio-Belver & Gaizka Garechana-Anacabe, 2020. "Fuel-Cell Electric Vehicles: Plotting a Scientific and Technological Knowledge Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, March.
    16. Bremer, Lucas & Heitmann, Mark & Schreiner, Thomas F., 2017. "When and how to infer heuristic consideration set rules of consumers," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 516-535.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0090873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.