IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0013893.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standardizing Clinical Trials Workflow Representation in UML for International Site Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Elias Cesar Araujo de Carvalho
  • Madhav Kishore Jayanti
  • Adelia Portero Batilana
  • Andreia M O Kozan
  • Maria J Rodrigues
  • Jatin Shah
  • Marco R Loures
  • Sunita Patil
  • Philip Payne
  • Ricardo Pietrobon

Abstract

Background: With the globalization of clinical trials, a growing emphasis has been placed on the standardization of the workflow in order to ensure the reproducibility and reliability of the overall trial. Despite the importance of workflow evaluation, to our knowledge no previous studies have attempted to adapt existing modeling languages to standardize the representation of clinical trials. Unified Modeling Language (UML) is a computational language that can be used to model operational workflow, and a UML profile can be developed to standardize UML models within a given domain. This paper's objective is to develop a UML profile to extend the UML Activity Diagram schema into the clinical trials domain, defining a standard representation for clinical trial workflow diagrams in UML. Methods: Two Brazilian clinical trial sites in rheumatology and oncology were examined to model their workflow and collect time-motion data. UML modeling was conducted in Eclipse, and a UML profile was developed to incorporate information used in discrete event simulation software. Results: Ethnographic observation revealed bottlenecks in workflow: these included tasks requiring full commitment of CRCs, transferring notes from paper to computers, deviations from standard operating procedures, and conflicts between different IT systems. Time-motion analysis revealed that nurses' activities took up the most time in the workflow and contained a high frequency of shorter duration activities. Administrative assistants performed more activities near the beginning and end of the workflow. Overall, clinical trial tasks had a greater frequency than clinic routines or other general activities. Conclusions: This paper describes a method for modeling clinical trial workflow in UML and standardizing these workflow diagrams through a UML profile. In the increasingly global environment of clinical trials, the standardization of workflow modeling is a necessary precursor to conducting a comparative analysis of international clinical trials workflows.

Suggested Citation

  • Elias Cesar Araujo de Carvalho & Madhav Kishore Jayanti & Adelia Portero Batilana & Andreia M O Kozan & Maria J Rodrigues & Jatin Shah & Marco R Loures & Sunita Patil & Philip Payne & Ricardo Pietrobo, 2010. "Standardizing Clinical Trials Workflow Representation in UML for International Site Comparison," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(11), pages 1-8, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0013893
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013893
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0013893
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0013893&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0013893?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Reijers, H. A. & Liman Mansar, S., 2005. "Best practices in business process redesign: an overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 283-306, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alarcón, F. & Alemany, M.M.E. & Ortiz, A., 2009. "Conceptual framework for the characterization of the order promising process in a collaborative selling network context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 100-114, July.
    2. Trkman, Peter, 2010. "The critical success factors of business process management," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 125-134.
    3. Patrick Afflerbach & Martin Hohendorf & Jonas Manderscheid, 0. "Design it like Darwin - A value-based application of evolutionary algorithms for proper and unambiguous business process redesign," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    4. Ranđelović Aleksandra Stoiljković & Milojević Radenko & Radosavljević Marija, 2018. "Identification and Analysis of Key Business Process Management Factors," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 56(1), pages 57-78, April.
    5. Martin Lehnert & Alexander Linhart & Maximilian Röglinger, 2016. "Value-based process project portfolio management: integrated planning of BPM capability development and process improvement," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 9(2), pages 377-419, August.
    6. Erik Poppe & Anastasiia Pika & Moe Thandar Wynn & Rebekah Eden & Robert Andrews & Arthur H. M. Hofstede, 2021. "Extracting Best-Practice Using Mixed-Methods," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(6), pages 637-651, December.
    7. Laura Stefanescu & Madalina Constantinescu & Andy Stefanescu & Pompiliu Constantinescu, 2007. "Rethinking The Business Process Through Reengineering," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 2(1(2)_Fall).
    8. Arava Tsoury & Pnina Soffer & Iris Reinhartz-Berger, 2020. "Data Impact Analysis in Business Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(1), pages 41-60, February.
    9. Alaaeddine Yousfi & Rajaa Saidi & Anind K. Dey, 2016. "Variability patterns for business processes in BPMN," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 443-467, August.
    10. Dries Couckuyt & Amy Van Looy, 2019. "Green BPM as a Business-Oriented Discipline: A Systematic Mapping Study and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Santosh B. Rane & Yahya A. M. Narvel, 2021. "Leveraging the industry 4.0 technologies for improving agility of project procurement management processes," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(6), pages 1146-1172, December.
    12. Mahmoudi Meimand, M & Mollaei, E., 2014. "The Effect of Business Process Re-Engineering Factors on Organizational Agility Using Path Analysis: Case Study of Ports & Maritime Organization in Iran," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(12), pages 1849-1864, December.
    13. Robinson, Stewart & Radnor, Zoe J. & Burgess, Nicola & Worthington, Claire, 2012. "SimLean: Utilising simulation in the implementation of lean in healthcare," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 188-197.
    14. Rob J. B. Vanwersch & Khurram Shahzad & Irene Vanderfeesten & Kris Vanhaecht & Paul Grefen & Liliane Pintelon & Jan Mendling & Godefridus G. Merode & Hajo A. Reijers, 2016. "A Critical Evaluation and Framework of Business Process Improvement Methods," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 58(1), pages 43-53, February.
    15. Hajo A. Reijers & Minseok Song & Byungduk Jeong, 2009. "Analysis of a collaborative workflow process with distributed actors," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 307-322, July.
    16. Markus Schäfermeyer & Christoph Rosenkranz & Roland Holten, 2012. "The Impact of Business Process Complexity on Business Process Standardization," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(5), pages 261-270, October.
    17. Wartika & Kridanto Surendro & Husni Satramihardja & Iping Supriana, 2015. "Business Process Improvement Conceptual Models to Improve the Efficiency of Power Consumption on Computer Use from the Perspective of Human Resources Performance," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 1(3), pages 99-106.
    18. Alexander Linhart & Maximilian Röglinger & Katharina Stelzl, 2020. "A Project Portfolio Management Approach to Tackling the Exploration/Exploitation Trade-off," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(2), pages 103-119, April.
    19. Škrinjar, Rok & Trkman, Peter, 2013. "Increasing process orientation with business process management: Critical practices’," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 48-60.
    20. Patrick Afflerbach & Martin Hohendorf & Jonas Manderscheid, 2017. "Design it like Darwin - A value-based application of evolutionary algorithms for proper and unambiguous business process redesign," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1101-1121, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0013893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.