IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0011437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geostatistical analysis of active human cysticercosis: Results of a large-scale study in 60 villages in Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Veronique Dermauw
  • Ellen Van De Vijver
  • Pierre Dorny
  • Emanuele Giorgi
  • Rasmané Ganaba
  • Athanase Millogo
  • Zékiba Tarnagda
  • Assana Kone Cissé
  • Hélène Carabin

Abstract

Cysticercosis is a neglected tropical disease caused by the larval stage of the zoonotic tapeworm (Taenia solium). While there is a clear spatial component in the occurrence of the parasite, no geostatistical analysis of active human cysticercosis has been conducted yet, nor has such an analysis been conducted for Sub-Saharan Africa, albeit relevant for guiding prevention and control strategies. The goal of this study was to conduct a geostatistical analysis of active human cysticercosis, using data from the baseline cross-sectional component of a large-scale study in 60 villages in Burkina Faso. The outcome was the prevalence of active human cysticercosis (hCC), determined using the B158/B60 Ag-ELISA, while various environmental variables linked with the transmission and spread of the disease were explored as potential explanatory variables for the spatial distribution of T. solium. A generalized linear geostatistical model (GLGM) was run, and prediction maps were generated. Analyses were conducted using data generated at two levels: individual participant data and grouped village data. The best model was selected using a backward variable selection procedure and models were compared using likelihood ratio testing. The best individual-level GLGM included precipitation (increasing values were associated with an increased odds of positive test result), distance to the nearest river (decreased odds) and night land temperature (decreased odds) as predictors for active hCC, whereas the village-level GLGM only retained precipitation and distance to the nearest river. The range of spatial correlation was estimated at 45.0 [95%CI: 34.3; 57.8] meters and 28.2 [95%CI: 14.0; 56.2] km for the individual- and village-level datasets, respectively. Individual- and village-level GLGM unravelled large areas with active hCC predicted prevalence estimates of at least 4% in the south-east, the extreme south, and north-west of the study area, while patches of prevalence estimates below 2% were seen in the north and west. More research designed to analyse the spatial characteristics of hCC is needed with sampling strategies ensuring appropriate characterisation of spatial variability, and incorporating the uncertainty linked to the measurement of outcome and environmental variables in the geostatistical analysis.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT0309339.Author summary: Cysticercosis is a serious, yet neglected disease caused by the larval stage of a zoonotic tapeworm, prevalent in many developing countries, including Burkina Faso. Being able to predict where the disease occurs is essential for running targeted prevention and control activities. In our study, we aimed to describe whether human cysticercosis cases in three provinces in Burkina Faso were clustered, and investigated whether there was a link between this clustering and some land and weather variables. Finally, we aimed to generate high-resolution prediction maps for the occurrence of the infection. We found that there was clustering at 45 meters for the individual- and 28.2 km for the village-level datasets, respectively. Increasing rainfall and proximity to a river were linked with this clustering. The generated prediction maps indicated there were important cysticercosis hotspots in the study area, especially in the extreme south and north-west, where the disease is thought to be more important. Further research should expand the use of spatial techniques to predict the occurrence of cysticercosis, the results of which can aid in the design of intervention programmes.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronique Dermauw & Ellen Van De Vijver & Pierre Dorny & Emanuele Giorgi & Rasmané Ganaba & Athanase Millogo & Zékiba Tarnagda & Assana Kone Cissé & Hélène Carabin, 2023. "Geostatistical analysis of active human cysticercosis: Results of a large-scale study in 60 villages in Burkina Faso," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011437
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011437
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0011437&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Achille Kabore & Nana-Kwadwo Biritwum & Philip W Downs & Ricardo J Soares Magalhaes & Yaobi Zhang & Eric A Ottesen, 2013. "Predictive vs. Empiric Assessment of Schistosomiasis: Implications for Treatment Projections in Ghana," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-8, March.
    2. Peter Diggle & Søren Lophaven, 2006. "Bayesian Geostatistical Design," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 33(1), pages 53-64, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K. Shuvo Bakar & Nicholas Biddle & Philip Kokic & Huidong Jin, 2020. "A Bayesian spatial categorical model for prediction to overlapping geographical areas in sample surveys," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(2), pages 535-563, February.
    2. Victor De Oliveira & Zifei Han, 2022. "On Information About Covariance Parameters in Gaussian Matérn Random Fields," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 690-712, December.
    3. Erum Zahid & Ijaz Hussain & Gunter Spöck & Muhammad Faisal & Javid Shabbir & Nasser M. AbdEl-Salam & Tajammal Hussain, 2016. "Spatial Prediction and Optimized Sampling Design for Sodium Concentration in Groundwater," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Hartman, Linda & Hossjer, Ola, 2008. "Fast kriging of large data sets with Gaussian Markov random fields," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 2331-2349, January.
    5. Borgoni, Riccardo & Radaelli, Luigi & Tritto, Valeria & Zappa, Diego, 2013. "Optimal reduction of a spatial monitoring grid: Proposals and applications in process control," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 407-419.
    6. Eidsvik, Jo & Finley, Andrew O. & Banerjee, Sudipto & Rue, Håvard, 2012. "Approximate Bayesian inference for large spatial datasets using predictive process models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1362-1380.
    7. Letícia Ellen Dal Canton & Luciana Pagliosa Carvalho Guedes & Miguel Angel Uribe-Opazo, 2021. "Reduction of Sample Size in the Soil Physical-Chemical Attributes Using the Multivariate Effective Sample Size," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(1), pages 357-376, June.
    8. Jacopo Paglia & Jo Eidsvik & Juha Karvanen, 2022. "Efficient spatial designs using Hausdorff distances and Bayesian optimization," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(3), pages 1060-1084, September.
    9. Finley, Andrew O. & Sang, Huiyan & Banerjee, Sudipto & Gelfand, Alan E., 2009. "Improving the performance of predictive process modeling for large datasets," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 2873-2884, June.
    10. Nicholas A S Hamm & Ricardo J Soares Magalhães & Archie C A Clements, 2015. "Earth Observation, Spatial Data Quality, and Neglected Tropical Diseases," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Sudipto Banerjee & Alan E. Gelfand & Andrew O. Finley & Huiyan Sang, 2008. "Gaussian predictive process models for large spatial data sets," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 825-848, September.
    12. Qian Ren & Sudipto Banerjee, 2013. "Hierarchical Factor Models for Large Spatially Misaligned Data: A Low-Rank Predictive Process Approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 19-30, March.
    13. Arbia, Giuseppe & Lafratta, Giovanni & Simeoni, Carla, 2007. "Spatial sampling plans to monitor the 3-D spatial distribution of extremes in soil pollution surveys," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 4069-4082, May.
    14. Elizabeth G. Ryan & Christopher C. Drovandi & James M. McGree & Anthony N. Pettitt, 2016. "A Review of Modern Computational Algorithms for Bayesian Optimal Design," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 84(1), pages 128-154, April.
    15. Jo Eidsvik & Sara Martino & Håvard Rue, 2009. "Approximate Bayesian Inference in Spatial Generalized Linear Mixed Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 36(1), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Wang, Craig & Furrer, Reinhard, 2021. "Combining heterogeneous spatial datasets with process-based spatial fusion models: A unifying framework," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    17. Elizabeth Eisenhauer & Ephraim Hanks, 2020. "A lattice and random intermediate point sampling design for animal movement," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), September.
    18. Subhadra Dasgupta & Siuli Mukhopadhyay & Jonathan Keith, 2024. "G‐optimal grid designs for kriging models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 51(3), pages 1061-1085, September.
    19. Shengde Liang & Sudipto Banerjee & Bradley P. Carlin, 2009. "Bayesian Wombling for Spatial Point Processes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(4), pages 1243-1253, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0011437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.