IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pntd00/0008164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational exposure to Brucella spp.: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Carine Rodrigues Pereira
  • João Vitor Fernandes Cotrim de Almeida
  • Izabela Regina Cardoso de Oliveira
  • Luciana Faria de Oliveira
  • Luciano José Pereira
  • Márcio Gilberto Zangerônimo
  • Andrey Pereira Lage
  • Elaine Maria Seles Dorneles

Abstract

Brucellosis is a neglected zoonotic disease of remarkable importance worldwide. The focus of this systematic review was to investigate occupational brucellosis and to identify the main infection risks for each group exposed to the pathogen. Seven databases were used to identify papers related to occupational brucellosis: CABI, Cochrane, Pubmed, Scielo, Science Direct, Scopus and Web of Science. The search resulted in 6123 studies, of which 63 were selected using the quality assessment tools guided from National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Case Report Guidelines (CARE). Five different job-related groups were considered greatly exposed to the disease: rural workers, abattoir workers, veterinarians and veterinary assistants, laboratory workers and hunters. The main risk factors and exposure sources involved in the occupational infection observed from the analysis of the articles were direct contact with animal fluids, failure to comply with the use of personal protective equipment, accidental exposure to live attenuated anti-brucellosis vaccines and non-compliance with biosafety standards. Brucella species frequently isolated from job-related infection were Brucella melitensis, Brucella abortus, Brucella suis and Brucella canis. In addition, a meta-analysis was performed using the case-control studies and demonstrated that animal breeders, laboratory workers and abattoir workers have 3.47 [95% confidence interval (CI); 1.47–8.19] times more chance to become infected with Brucella spp. than others individuals that have no contact with the possible sources of infection. This systematic review improved the understanding of the epidemiology of brucellosis as an occupational disease. Rural workers, abattoir workers, veterinarians, laboratory workers and hunters were the groups more exposed to occupational Brucella spp. infection. Moreover, it was observed that the lack of knowledge about brucellosis among frequently exposed professionals, in addition to some behaviors, such as negligence in the use of individual and collective protective measures, increases the probability of infection.Author summary: Brucellosis is a zoonotic bacterial infection of major importance worldwide, affecting not only domestic animals but different wildlife species. Due to its ways of transmission, direct or indirect contact with infected animals or their contaminated biological products, the disease exhibits a strong occupational character. This systematic review addressed the main occupations affected by Brucella spp. infection, due to the regular exposure to aerosol and contact of non-intact skin (e.g. wounds and abrasion) with infected materials, such as carcasses, viscera and live attenuated anti-brucellosis vaccines. The main risk factors for the disease were identified, as well as the most common forms of exposure to the pathogen. In addition, the most frequently Brucella species isolated from farmers, abattoir workers, veterinarians and veterinary technicians, laboratory workers and hunters were also described. The constant contact with the pathogen, the lack of information and instructions to occupational groups exposed, as well as the low adhesion to personal protective equipment in the work environment are determining factors for the occurrence of brucellosis among these individuals.

Suggested Citation

  • Carine Rodrigues Pereira & João Vitor Fernandes Cotrim de Almeida & Izabela Regina Cardoso de Oliveira & Luciana Faria de Oliveira & Luciano José Pereira & Márcio Gilberto Zangerônimo & Andrey Pereira, 2020. "Occupational exposure to Brucella spp.: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008164
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008164
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008164&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008164?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    2. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helena Sustar & Miloš N. Mladenović & Moshe Givoni, 2020. "The Landscape of Envisioning and Speculative Design Methods for Sustainable Mobility Futures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Xiang Yan & Jie Du & GuoPing Ji, 2021. "Prevalence and factors associated with fertility desire among people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Ribeiro-Navarrete, Samuel & Saura, Jose Ramon & Palacios-Marqués, Daniel, 2021. "Towards a new era of mass data collection: Assessing pandemic surveillance technologies to preserve user privacy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Björn Hedin & Cecilia Katzeff & Elina Eriksson & Daniel Pargman, 2019. "A Systematic Review of Digital Behaviour Change Interventions for More Sustainable Food Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Liqing Yue & Virginia Plummer & Wendy Cross, 2017. "The effectiveness of nurse education and training for clinical alarm response and management: a systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(17-18), pages 2511-2526, September.
    6. Rose E Donohue & Zoë K Cross & Edwin Michael, 2019. "The extent, nature, and pathogenic consequences of helminth polyparasitism in humans: A meta-analysis," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-41, June.
    7. Mathew Barnes & Purva Abhyankar & Elena Dimova & Catherine Best, 2020. "Associations between body dissatisfaction and self-reported anxiety and depression in otherwise healthy men: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Eliz Kilich & Sara Dada & Mark R Francis & John Tazare & R Matthew Chico & Pauline Paterson & Heidi J Larson, 2020. "Factors that influence vaccination decision-making among pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, July.
    9. Cho Naing & Simon A Reid & Saint Nway Aye & Norah Htet Htet & Stephen Ambu, 2019. "Risk factors for human leptospirosis following flooding: A meta-analysis of observational studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Udeme E Ekrikpo & Andre P Kengne & Aminu K Bello & Emmanuel E Effa & Jean Jacques Noubiap & Babatunde L Salako & Brian L Rayner & Giuseppe Remuzzi & Ikechi G Okpechi, 2018. "Chronic kidney disease in the global adult HIV-infected population: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, April.
    11. Teketo Kassaw Tegegne & Catherine Chojenta & Deborah Loxton & Roger Smith & Kelemu Tilahun Kibret, 2018. "The impact of geographic access on institutional delivery care use in low and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Rahman, Shaikh Moksadur, 2020. "Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intention: Evidence from Bangladesh," Asian Business Review, Asian Business Consortium, vol. 10(2), pages 99-108.
    13. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    14. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    15. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    16. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Wang Kai, 2019. "Towards a Taxonomy of Idea Generation Techniques," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 65-80, January.
    18. Oded Berger-Tal & Alison L Greggor & Biljana Macura & Carrie Ann Adams & Arden Blumenthal & Amos Bouskila & Ulrika Candolin & Carolina Doran & Esteban Fernández-Juricic & Kiyoko M Gotanda & Catherine , 2019. "Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(1), pages 1-8.
    19. Bridgelall, Raj & Stubbing, Edward, 2021. "Forecasting the effects of autonomous vehicles on land use," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    20. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pntd00:0008164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosntds (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.