IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0000646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Mobilizing our leaders”: A multi-country qualitative study to increase the representation of women in global health leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia T Riche
  • Lindsey K Reif
  • Natalie T Nguyen
  • G Rinu Alakiu
  • Grace Seo
  • Jyoti S Mathad
  • Margaret L McNairy
  • Alexandra A Cordeiro
  • Aarti Kinikar
  • Kathleen F Walsh
  • Marie Marcelle Deschamps
  • Sandy Nerette
  • Smita Nimkar
  • Neema Kayange
  • Hyasinta Jaka
  • Halima M Mwaisungu
  • Domenica Morona
  • Thandiwe Yvonne Peter
  • Nishi Suryavanshi
  • Daniel W Fitzgerald
  • Jennifer A Downs
  • Adolfine Hokororo

Abstract

Introduction: Women play an essential role in health care delivery, and it is vital that they have equal representation in health leadership for equity, innovation, and the strengthening of health systems globally. Yet women remain vastly underrepresented in global health leadership positions, providing a clear example of the deeply rooted power imbalances that are central to the calls to decolonize global health. We conducted a multi-country study in Haiti, Tanzania, India, and the USA to examine gender-based challenges to career advancement for women in the global health workforce. Quantitative data on the type and prevalence of gender-based challenges has been previously reported. In this study, we analyze qualitative data collected through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews to understand women’s experiences of gender-based obstacles to career advancement, their perceptions of underlying drivers, and perspectives on effective solutions. Guided by an adaptation of the Social Action Theory, we conducted focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with women at 4 major academic centers for clinical care and research in Haiti, India, Tanzania, and the United States. In total, 85 women participated in focus groups and 15 also participated in in-depth interviews. Discussions and interviews were conducted in the local language, by an experienced local facilitator unaffiliated with the participating institution, between 2017 and 2018. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and translated. Data were analyzed by interpretive phenomenological methods for emergent themes. Three transcendent themes on gender-based challenges were identified: 1) cultural power imbalance, referring to the prevailing norms and engrained assumptions that women are less capable than men and that women’s primary responsibility should be to their families; 2) institutional power imbalance, referring to the systematic gender bias upheld by existing leadership and power structures, and ranging from exclusion from career development opportunities to sexual harassment and assault; and 3) restricted agency, referring to women’s limited ability to change their circumstances because of unequal cultural and institutional structures. Participants also described local, actionable solutions to address these barriers. These included: 1) formal reporting systems for sexual harassment and assault; 2) peer support and mentorship; and 3) accessible leadership training and mandatory gender equity training. Participants proposed feasible strategies to address gender-based challenges that could improve women’s retention in health careers and foster their rise to leadership. Increasing the representation of women in global health leadership positions responds directly to efforts to decolonize global health and is integral to strengthening health systems and improving health outcomes for women and children worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia T Riche & Lindsey K Reif & Natalie T Nguyen & G Rinu Alakiu & Grace Seo & Jyoti S Mathad & Margaret L McNairy & Alexandra A Cordeiro & Aarti Kinikar & Kathleen F Walsh & Marie Marcelle Descham, 2023. "“Mobilizing our leaders”: A multi-country qualitative study to increase the representation of women in global health leadership," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000646
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000646
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0000646&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monica Fisher & Violet Nyabaro & Ruth Mendum & Moses Osiru, 2020. "Making it to the PhD: Gender and student performance in sub-Saharan Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Tehmina Khan & Pavithra Siriwardhane, 2021. "Barriers to Career Progression in the Higher Education Sector: Perceptions of Australian Academics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Mathias Wullum Nielsen & Jens Peter Andersen & Londa Schiebinger & Jesper W. Schneider, 2017. "One and a half million medical papers reveal a link between author gender and attention to gender and sex analysis," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(11), pages 791-796, November.
    4. Merry-Jo D. Levers, 2013. "Philosophical Paradigms, Grounded Theory, and Perspectives on Emergence," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baron, Justus & Ganglmair, Bernhard & Persico, Nicola & Simcoe, Timothy & Tarantino, Emanuele, 2024. "Representation is not sufficient for selecting gender diversity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(6).
    2. Blessing Kanyumba & Melanie Lourens, 2022. "Career development for female academics in Australian and South African universities: An integrative review," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(2), pages 391-401, March.
    3. Folusho Mubowale Balogun & Yolanda Malele-Kolisa & Sara Jewett Nieuwoudt & Hellen Jepngetich & Jepchirchir Kiplagat & Oyewale Mayowa Morakinyo & Jeanette Dawa & Nomathemba Chandiwana & Admire Chikandi, 2021. "Experiences of doctoral students enrolled in a research fellowship program to support doctoral training in Africa (2014 to 2018): The Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa odyssey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2023. "Families of Grounded Theory: A Theoretical Structure for Novel Researchers," MPRA Paper 116752, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Jan 2023.
    5. Emily Ryan & Matthew Pepper & Albert Munoz, 2021. "Causal Loop Diagram Aggregation Towards Model Completeness," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 37-51, February.
    6. Alexander D VanHelene & Ishaani Khatri & C Beau Hilton & Sanjay Mishra & Ece D Gamsiz Uzun & Jeremy L Warner, 2024. "Inferring gender from first names: Comparing the accuracy of Genderize, Gender API, and the gender R package on authors of diverse nationality," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Stephen Case, 2021. "Challenging the Reductionism of “Evidence-Based” Youth Justice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Aron Laxdal, 2023. "The sex gap in sports and exercise medicine research: who does research on females?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1987-1994, March.
    9. repec:osf:osfxxx:3agxf_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Jens Peter Andersen & Serge P. J. M. Horbach & Tony Ross-Hellauer, 2024. "Through the secret gate: a study of member-contributed submissions in PNAS," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(9), pages 5673-5687, September.
    11. Kalyani Subbiah & Arima Mishra & Jaya A. R. Dantas, 2023. "Gynaecological Cancers in India: The Less Heard Perspectives of Healthcare Providers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Antonio De Nicola & Gregorio D’Agostino, 2021. "Assessment of gender divide in scientific communities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3807-3840, May.
    13. Anne Laure Humbert & Elisabeth Anna Guenther & Jörg Müller, 2021. "Not Simply ‘Counting Heads’: A Gender Diversity Index for the Team Level," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 689-707, September.
    14. Abdulwahab Mujalli & Tehmina Khan & Ahmed Almgrashi, 2022. "University Accounting Students and Faculty Members Using the Blackboard Platform during COVID-19; Proposed Modification of the UTAUT Model and an Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    15. David Ardia & Keven Bluteau & Mohammad‐Abbas Meghani, 2024. "Thirty years of academic finance," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1008-1042, July.
    16. Lori van den Hurk & Sarah Hiltner & Sabine Oertelt-Prigione, 2022. "Operationalization and Reporting Practices in Manuscripts Addressing Gender Differences in Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Bibliographical Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Luke William John Watkins & Alinka Gearon, 2024. "Mapping Driving Factors of UK Serious Youth Violence across Policy and the Community: A Multi-Level Discoursal Analysis," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Junhanlu Zhang & Rachel Torchet & Hanna Julienne, 2023. "Gender-based disparities and biases in science: An observational study of a virtual conference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Mattia Casula & Nandhini Rangarajan & Patricia Shields, 2021. "The potential of working hypotheses for deductive exploratory research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1703-1725, October.
    20. Sperber, Sonja & Täuber, Susanne & Post, Corinne & Barzantny, Cordula, 2023. "Gender Data Gap and its impact on management science — Reflections from a European perspective," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 2-8.
    21. Alison Clements & Angela Nicholas & Karen E Martin & Susan Young, 2022. "Towards an Evidence-Based Model of Workplace Postvention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0000646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.