IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v3y2013i4p2158244013517243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Philosophical Paradigms, Grounded Theory, and Perspectives on Emergence

Author

Listed:
  • Merry-Jo D. Levers

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present a plausible framework to initiate discussion regarding the concept of emergence in grounded theory. Using ontological and epistemological positions to develop three research paradigms, and applying these paradigms to various uptakes of grounded theory demonstrates differences in the definition of emergence. Discovery emergence is presented as a unidirectional relationship between the constituent parts (data) and the emergent property (theory) observed by an external postpositivist grounded theorist. Mechanistic emergence is presented as having a bidirectional relationship between the constituent part (data) and the emergent property (theory) observed by an external constructionist grounded theorist. Finally, reflective emergence is presented as having a bidirectional relationship between the constituent parts (data) and the emergent property (theory) interpreted by an interpretivist grounded theorist.

Suggested Citation

  • Merry-Jo D. Levers, 2013. "Philosophical Paradigms, Grounded Theory, and Perspectives on Emergence," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:2158244013517243
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244013517243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244013517243
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244013517243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalyani Subbiah & Arima Mishra & Jaya A. R. Dantas, 2023. "Gynaecological Cancers in India: The Less Heard Perspectives of Healthcare Providers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Fregidou-Malama, Maria & Hyder, Akmal S., 2021. "Multilevel trust in international marketing of healthcare services: A five-country comparative study," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    3. Stephen Case, 2021. "Challenging the Reductionism of “Evidence-Based” Youth Justice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2023. "Families of Grounded Theory: A Theoretical Structure for Novel Researchers," MPRA Paper 116752, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Jan 2023.
    5. Mattia Casula & Nandhini Rangarajan & Patricia Shields, 2021. "The potential of working hypotheses for deductive exploratory research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(5), pages 1703-1725, October.
    6. Mojtaba Khaghani Milani & Mahmoud Reza Hashemi, 2020. "Extended grounded theory: a methodology to combine multiple disciplines," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 89-120, March.
    7. Martin Reynolds & Emily Gates & Richard Hummelbrunner & Mita Marra & Bob Williams, 2016. "Towards Systemic Evaluation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 662-673, September.
    8. Emily Ryan & Matthew Pepper & Albert Munoz, 2021. "Causal Loop Diagram Aggregation Towards Model Completeness," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 37-51, February.
    9. Alison Clements & Angela Nicholas & Karen E Martin & Susan Young, 2022. "Towards an Evidence-Based Model of Workplace Postvention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:2158244013517243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.