IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgen00/1005767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iterative Usage of Fixed and Random Effect Models for Powerful and Efficient Genome-Wide Association Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolei Liu
  • Meng Huang
  • Bin Fan
  • Edward S Buckler
  • Zhiwu Zhang

Abstract

False positives in a Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) can be effectively controlled by a fixed effect and random effect Mixed Linear Model (MLM) that incorporates population structure and kinship among individuals to adjust association tests on markers; however, the adjustment also compromises true positives. The modified MLM method, Multiple Loci Linear Mixed Model (MLMM), incorporates multiple markers simultaneously as covariates in a stepwise MLM to partially remove the confounding between testing markers and kinship. To completely eliminate the confounding, we divided MLMM into two parts: Fixed Effect Model (FEM) and a Random Effect Model (REM) and use them iteratively. FEM contains testing markers, one at a time, and multiple associated markers as covariates to control false positives. To avoid model over-fitting problem in FEM, the associated markers are estimated in REM by using them to define kinship. The P values of testing markers and the associated markers are unified at each iteration. We named the new method as Fixed and random model Circulating Probability Unification (FarmCPU). Both real and simulated data analyses demonstrated that FarmCPU improves statistical power compared to current methods. Additional benefits include an efficient computing time that is linear to both number of individuals and number of markers. Now, a dataset with half million individuals and half million markers can be analyzed within three days.Author Summary: Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) can reveal genetic-phenotypic relationships, but have limitations. To control false positives, population structure and kinship are incorporated in a fixed and random effect Mixed Linear Model (MLM). However, because of the confounding between population structure, kinship, and quantitative trait nucleotides (QTNs), MLM leads to false negatives, missing some potentially important discoveries. Here, we present a new method, Fixed and random model Circulating Probability Unification (FarmCPU). FarmCPU performs marker tests with associated markers as covariates in a fixed effect model and optimization on the associated covariate markers in a random effect model separately. This process enables efficient computation, removes the confounding, prevents model over-fitting, and controls false positives simultaneously. FarmCPU controls false positives as well as MLM with reductions in both false negatives and computing times. Researchers will not only be able to analyze big data, but will also have greater success with fewer mistakes when mapping genes of interest.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolei Liu & Meng Huang & Bin Fan & Edward S Buckler & Zhiwu Zhang, 2016. "Iterative Usage of Fixed and Random Effect Models for Powerful and Efficient Genome-Wide Association Studies," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1005767
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005767
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005767
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1005767&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005767?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Girma Mengistu & Hussein Shimelis & Ermias Assefa & Dagnachew Lule, 2021. "Genome-wide association analysis of anthracnose resistance in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Cox Lwaka Tamba & Yuan-Li Ni & Yuan-Ming Zhang, 2017. "Iterative sure independence screening EM-Bayesian LASSO algorithm for multi-locus genome-wide association studies," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Guangbao Guo & Guoqi Qian & Lu Lin & Wei Shao, 2021. "Parallel inference for big data with the group Bayesian method," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 225-243, February.
    4. Justin N. Vaughn & Sandra E. Branham & Brian Abernathy & Amanda M. Hulse-Kemp & Adam R. Rivers & Amnon Levi & William P. Wechter, 2022. "Graph-based pangenomics maximizes genotyping density and reveals structural impacts on fungal resistance in melon," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Gianola, Daniel & Fernando, Rohan L. & Schön, Chris-Carolin, 2020. "Inferring trait-specific similarity among individuals from molecular markers and phenotypes with Bayesian regression," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 47-59.
    6. Alemayehu Teressa Negawo & Meki Shehabu Muktar & Ricardo Alonso Sánchez Gutiérrez & Ermias Habte & Alice Muchugi & Chris S. Jones, 2024. "A Genome-Wide Association Study of Biomass Yield and Feed Quality in Buffel Grass ( Cenchrus ciliaris L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-27, February.
    7. Xubin Lu & Hui Jiang & Abdelaziz Adam Idriss Arbab & Bo Wang & Dingding Liu & Ismail Mohamed Abdalla & Tianle Xu & Yujia Sun & Zongping Liu & Zhangping Yang, 2023. "Investigating Genetic Characteristics of Chinese Holstein Cow’s Milk Somatic Cell Score by Genetic Parameter Estimation and Genome-Wide Association," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Zhanwei Zhuang & Shaoyun Li & Rongrong Ding & Ming Yang & Enqin Zheng & Huaqiang Yang & Ting Gu & Zheng Xu & Gengyuan Cai & Zhenfang Wu & Jie Yang, 2019. "Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for loin muscle area and loin muscle depth in two Duroc pig populations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Niloy Biswas & Anirban Bhattacharya & Pierre E. Jacob & James E. Johndrow, 2022. "Coupling‐based convergence assessment of some Gibbs samplers for high‐dimensional Bayesian regression with shrinkage priors," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(3), pages 973-996, July.
    10. Yue Xin & Lina Gao & Wenming Hu & Qi Gao & Bin Yang & Jianguo Zhou & Cuilian Xu, 2022. "Genome-Wide Association Study Based on Plant Height and Drought-Tolerance Indices Reveals Two Candidate Drought-Tolerance Genes in Sweet Sorghum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Lanzhi Li & Xingfei Zheng & Jiabo Wang & Xueli Zhang & Xiaogang He & Liwen Xiong & Shufeng Song & Jing Su & Ying Diao & Zheming Yuan & Zhiwu Zhang & Zhongli Hu, 2023. "Joint analysis of phenotype-effect-generation identifies loci associated with grain quality traits in rice hybrids," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    12. Uğur Sesiz, 2023. "Deciphering Genomic Regions and Putative Candidate Genes for Grain Size and Shape Traits in Durum Wheat through GWAS," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, September.
    13. Xiaojun Mao & Somak Dutta & Raymond K. W. Wong & Dan Nettleton, 2020. "Adjusting for Spatial Effects in Genomic Prediction," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(4), pages 699-718, December.
    14. Prabin Bajgain & James A. Anderson, 2021. "Multi-Allelic Haplotype-Based Association Analysis Identifies Genomic Regions Controlling Domestication Traits in Intermediate Wheatgrass," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgen00:1005767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosgenetics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.