Author
Listed:
- Kristelle Craven
- Jain Holmes
- Jade Kettlewell
- Kathryn Radford
Abstract
Stroke incidence is rising among working-age adults in high-income countries. Employers often lack knowledge and skills to support return-to-work post-stroke. In the United Kingdom, nearly 40% of stroke survivors stop working. Vocational rehabilitation is rarely accessible, and self-guided resources often lack tools to support practical application. This study developed a self-guided return-to-work toolkit for stroke survivors and employers. Steps 1–4 of the six-step Intervention Mapping approach were followed. Intervention goal, content, and design were informed by three online workshops with employers (n = 12) and meetings with an advisory group (n = 20), including stroke charity and trade union representatives, stroke survivors, healthcare professionals, and experts in human resources and vocational rehabilitation. Theory-based pretesting (task-based usability review, advisory group discussions) was shaped by prototype review with advisory group members, including employers (n = 4), stroke survivors (n = 7), and healthcare professionals (n = 4). Framework analysis was used to structure feedback related to acceptability, ease of use/learnability, accessibility, inclusivity, perceived usefulness, and technical or environmental issues. No personal data were analysed. The toolkit aims to empower stroke survivors and employers to plan and manage a sustainable return-to-work post-stroke. It exists as two Xerte eLearning packages, with accessibility features such as screen reader compatibility and keyboard navigation. The toolkit contains theory- and evidence-based content for a) stroke survivors and b) employers, and includes downloadable PDF tools. Stroke survivor-focused content provides guidance on identifying and disclosing support needs to employers. Employer-focused content guides employers in increasing and maintaining understanding of stroke survivors’ work abilities, and implementing and monitoring tailored reasonable adjustments. Pretesting indicated the toolkit is comprehensive, empowering, and fosters open communication, offering key information and practical tools. Minor refinements and technical improvements were suggested. This toolkit addresses a gap in return-to-work guidance in the United Kingdom. Refinement, testing, and evaluation in real-world settings are needed.Author summary: More working-age people are having strokes, and many struggle to return to work afterward. In the United Kingdom, nearly 40% of stroke survivors stop working altogether. Employers often don’t know how to help, and support services are limited or hard to access. In this project, we worked closely with stroke survivors, employers, healthcare professionals, and other experts to design a toolkit to guide employees and employers in planning a stroke survivor’s return to work. We created two interactive online learning packages—one for stroke survivors and one for employers. Each offers practical advice and downloadable tools, such as how to talk about support needs, or make appropriate changes at work. We asked a group of stroke survivors, employers, and healthcare professionals to look at the toolkit and give feedback. The group reported that the toolkit content was clear, practical, and helpful, and that it encouraged open and honest communication. They suggested a few small changes and technical improvements. We believe this toolkit could make a difference for many people attempting to return to work after a stroke. Our next step is to make the suggested changes, and test how well it works in real-world settings.
Suggested Citation
Kristelle Craven & Jain Holmes & Jade Kettlewell & Kathryn Radford, 2025.
"Development of a digital, self-guided return-to-work toolkit for stroke survivors and employers using intervention mapping,"
PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(8), pages 1-21, August.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000971
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000971
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.