IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000598.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short-term vital parameter forecasting in the intensive care unit: A benchmark study leveraging data from patients after cardiothoracic surgery

Author

Listed:
  • Nils Hinrichs
  • Tobias Roeschl
  • Pia Lanmueller
  • Felix Balzer
  • Carsten Eickhoff
  • Benjamin O’Brien
  • Volkmar Falk
  • Alexander Meyer

Abstract

Patients in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) are closely and continuously monitored, and many machine learning (ML) solutions have been proposed to predict specific outcomes like death, bleeding, or organ failure. Forecasting of vital parameters is a more general approach to ML-based patient monitoring, but the literature on its feasibility and robust benchmarks of achievable accuracy are scarce. We implemented five univariate statistical models (the naïve model, the Theta method, exponential smoothing, the autoregressive integrated moving average model, and an autoregressive single-layer neural network), two univariate neural networks (N-BEATS and N-HiTS), and two multivariate neural networks designed for sequential data (a recurrent neural network with gated recurrent unit, GRU, and a Transformer network) to produce forecasts for six vital parameters recorded at five-minute intervals during intensive care monitoring. Vital parameters were the diastolic, systolic, and mean arterial blood pressure, central venous pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation (measured by non-invasive pulse oximetry) and heart rate, and forecasts were made for 5 through 120 minutes into the future. Patients used in this study recovered from cardiothoracic surgery in an ICU. The patient cohort used for model development (n = 22,348) and internal testing (n = 2,483) originated from a heart center in Germany, while a patient sub-set from the eICU collaborative research database, an American multicenter ICU cohort, was used for external testing (n = 7,477). The GRU was the predominant method in this study. Uni- and multivariate neural network models proved to be superior to univariate statistical models across vital parameters and forecast horizons, and their advantage steadily became more pronounced for increasing forecast horizons. With this study, we established an extensive set of benchmarks for forecast performance in the ICU. Our findings suggest that supplying physicians with short-term forecasts of vital parameters in the ICU is feasible, and that multivariate neural networks are most suited for the task due to their ability to learn patterns across thousands of patients.Author summary: The current health status of patients in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is continuously tracked through multiple vital parameters, and physicians use these markers to immediately detect life-threatening derangements and for treatment decision-making. Knowledge about future vital parameter values could lead to the anticipation and timely initiation of potentially life-saving interventions. We therefore sought to test how reliably vital parameters of patients in an ICU could be forecast. Vital parameters of interest were blood pressure (diastolic, systolic, and mean), central venous pressure, peripheral oxygen saturation, and heart rate. Our study cohort consisted of patients recovering from cardiothoracic surgery in one German and multiple American ICUs. Using patient data from roughly 22,000 ICU admissions, we developed nine forecast models, ranging in complexity from very simple to highly sophisticated and tested their performance on roughly 10,000 additional ICU admissions by making them forecast values for all six vital parameters over the next two hours. We thus generated an extensive collection of benchmarks for forecast accuracy in the ICU for future researchers to compare against. We found that, compared to simple statistical methods, sophisticated techniques capable of learning patterns from thousands of ICU stays are slightly better at forecasting the immediate next value, and much better when it comes to forecasting further ahead into the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Nils Hinrichs & Tobias Roeschl & Pia Lanmueller & Felix Balzer & Carsten Eickhoff & Benjamin O’Brien & Volkmar Falk & Alexander Meyer, 2024. "Short-term vital parameter forecasting in the intensive care unit: A benchmark study leveraging data from patients after cardiothoracic surgery," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(9), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000598
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000598
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000598&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyndman, Rob J. & Koehler, Anne B. & Snyder, Ralph D. & Grose, Simone, 2002. "A state space framework for automatic forecasting using exponential smoothing methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 439-454.
    2. Makridakis, Spyros & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2022. "M5 accuracy competition: Results, findings, and conclusions," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1346-1364.
    3. Hyndman, Rob J. & Billah, Baki, 2003. "Unmasking the Theta method," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 287-290.
    4. Spyros Makridakis & Evangelos Spiliotis & Vassilios Assimakopoulos, 2018. "Statistical and Machine Learning forecasting methods: Concerns and ways forward," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, March.
    5. Semenoglou, Artemios-Anargyros & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Makridakis, Spyros & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Investigating the accuracy of cross-learning time series forecasting methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1072-1084.
    6. Seyedmostafa Sheikhalishahi & Vevake Balaraman & Venet Osmani, 2020. "Benchmarking machine learning models on multi-centre eICU critical care dataset," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petropoulos, Fotios & Apiletti, Daniele & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Babai, Mohamed Zied & Barrow, Devon K. & Ben Taieb, Souhaib & Bergmeir, Christoph & Bessa, Ricardo J. & Bijak, Jakub & Boylan, Joh, 2022. "Forecasting: theory and practice," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 705-871.
      • Fotios Petropoulos & Daniele Apiletti & Vassilios Assimakopoulos & Mohamed Zied Babai & Devon K. Barrow & Souhaib Ben Taieb & Christoph Bergmeir & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jakub Bijak & John E. Boylan & Jet, 2020. "Forecasting: theory and practice," Papers 2012.03854, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    2. Makridakis, Spyros & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios & Chen, Zhi & Gaba, Anil & Tsetlin, Ilia & Winkler, Robert L., 2022. "The M5 uncertainty competition: Results, findings and conclusions," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1365-1385.
    3. Jennifer L. Castle & Jurgen A. Doornik & David F. Hendry, 2021. "Forecasting Principles from Experience with Forecasting Competitions," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Olivares, Kin G. & Meetei, O. Nganba & Ma, Ruijun & Reddy, Rohan & Cao, Mengfei & Dicker, Lee, 2024. "Probabilistic hierarchical forecasting with deep Poisson mixtures," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 470-489.
    5. Makridakis, Spyros & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2022. "Predicting/hypothesizing the findings of the M5 competition," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 1337-1345.
    6. Jennifer L. Castle & Jurgen A. Doornik & David Hendry, 2019. "Some forecasting principles from the M4 competition," Economics Papers 2019-W01, Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
    7. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Makridakis, Spyros & Kaltsounis, Anastasios & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2021. "Product sales probabilistic forecasting: An empirical evaluation using the M5 competition data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    8. Aviral Kumar Tiwari & Claudiu T Albulescu & Phouphet Kyophilavong, 2014. "A comparison of different forecasting models of the international trade in India," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 34(1), pages 420-429.
    9. Fildes, Robert & Petropoulos, Fotios, 2015. "Simple versus complex selection rules for forecasting many time series," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(8), pages 1692-1701.
    10. Huber, Jakob & Stuckenschmidt, Heiner, 2020. "Daily retail demand forecasting using machine learning with emphasis on calendric special days," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 1420-1438.
    11. Spiliotis, Evangelos & Petropoulos, Fotios, 2024. "On the update frequency of univariate forecasting models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 111-121.
    12. Wang, Shengjie & Kang, Yanfei & Petropoulos, Fotios, 2024. "Combining probabilistic forecasts of intermittent demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1038-1048.
    13. Mei-Li Shen & Cheng-Feng Lee & Hsiou-Hsiang Liu & Po-Yin Chang & Cheng-Hong Yang, 2021. "An Effective Hybrid Approach for Forecasting Currency Exchange Rates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-29, March.
    14. Evangelos Spiliotis & Fotios Petropoulos & Vassilios Assimakopoulos, 2023. "On the Disagreement of Forecasting Model Selection Criteria," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-12, June.
    15. Athanasopoulos, George & Hyndman, Rob J. & Song, Haiyan & Wu, Doris C., 2011. "The tourism forecasting competition," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 822-844.
    16. Schmidt, Felix G. & Pibernik, Richard, 2025. "Data-driven inventory control for large product portfolios: A practical application of prescriptive analytics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(1), pages 254-269.
    17. Makridakis, Spyros & Hyndman, Rob J. & Petropoulos, Fotios, 2020. "Forecasting in social settings: The state of the art," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 15-28.
    18. Wellens, Arnoud P. & Boute, Robert N. & Udenio, Maximiliano, 2024. "Simplifying tree-based methods for retail sales forecasting with explanatory variables," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 523-539.
    19. Sbrana, Giacomo & Silvestrini, Andrea, 2023. "The RWDAR model: A novel state-space approach to forecasting," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 922-937.
    20. Makridakis, Spyros & Spiliotis, Evangelos & Assimakopoulos, Vassilios, 2020. "The M4 Competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 54-74.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.