IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pdig00/0000270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disparities in mobile phone ownership reflect inequities in access to healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Blake
  • Ashley Hazel
  • John Jakurama
  • Justy Matundu
  • Nita Bharti

Abstract

Human movement and population connectivity inform infectious disease management. Remote data, particularly mobile phone usage data, are frequently used to track mobility in outbreak response efforts without measuring representation in target populations. Using a detailed interview instrument, we measure population representation in phone ownership, mobility, and access to healthcare in a highly mobile population with low access to health care in Namibia, a middle-income country. We find that 1) phone ownership is both low and biased by gender, 2) phone ownership is correlated with differences in mobility and access to healthcare, and 3) reception is spatially unequal and scarce in non-urban areas. We demonstrate that mobile phone data do not represent the populations and locations that most need public health improvements. Finally, we show that relying on these data to inform public health decisions can be harmful with the potential to magnify health inequities rather than reducing them. To reduce health inequities, it is critical to integrate multiple data streams with measured, non-overlapping biases to ensure data representativeness for vulnerable populations.Author summary: Mobile phone data are increasingly used to inform public health efforts in both high and low-income settings due to convenience and growing phone penetration. However, digital inequities are ubiquitous and more pronounced in areas where mobile phone ownership is low or heterogeneous. The biases introduced by using mobile phone data to represent populations and their health care needs are rarely measured but have the potential to be detrimental to the most vulnerable segments of populations. We conducted detailed interviews measuring mobile phone ownership, mobility, and access to healthcare in mobile and remote populations in Namibia. We found that mobile phone owners represent a small proportion of the population that is highly mobile and has better access to healthcare. This is likely not unique. Due to the nature of their collection, mobile phone data often underrepresent vulnerable populations. This study demonstrates that uncritically using mobile phone data to inform public health decisions can perpetuate health inequities.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Blake & Ashley Hazel & John Jakurama & Justy Matundu & Nita Bharti, 2023. "Disparities in mobile phone ownership reflect inequities in access to healthcare," PLOS Digital Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000270
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000270
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pdig.0000270&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pdig00:0000270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: digitalhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/digitalhealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.