IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profile-Wise Analysis: A profile likelihood-based workflow for identifiability analysis, estimation, and prediction with mechanistic mathematical models

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J Simpson
  • Oliver J Maclaren

Abstract

Interpreting data using mechanistic mathematical models provides a foundation for discovery and decision-making in all areas of science and engineering. Developing mechanistic insight by combining mathematical models and experimental data is especially critical in mathematical biology as new data and new types of data are collected and reported. Key steps in using mechanistic mathematical models to interpret data include: (i) identifiability analysis; (ii) parameter estimation; and (iii) model prediction. Here we present a systematic, computationally-efficient workflow we call Profile-Wise Analysis (PWA) that addresses all three steps in a unified way. Recently-developed methods for constructing ‘profile-wise’ prediction intervals enable this workflow and provide the central linkage between different workflow components. These methods propagate profile-likelihood-based confidence sets for model parameters to predictions in a way that isolates how different parameter combinations affect model predictions. We show how to extend these profile-wise prediction intervals to two-dimensional interest parameters. We then demonstrate how to combine profile-wise prediction confidence sets to give an overall prediction confidence set that approximates the full likelihood-based prediction confidence set well. Our three case studies illustrate practical aspects of the workflow, focusing on ordinary differential equation (ODE) mechanistic models with both Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise models. While the case studies focus on ODE-based models, the workflow applies to other classes of mathematical models, including partial differential equations and simulation-based stochastic models. Open-source software on GitHub can be used to replicate the case studies.Author summary: Parameter estimation and model prediction are essential steps when mathematical models are used to provide biological insight or to make practical predictions about future scenarios. We present an efficient, unified workflow that addresses parameter identifiability, parameter estimation and model prediction from a likelihood-based frequentist perspective. Our workflow, called Profile-Wise Analysis (PWA), involves constructing ‘profile-wise’ predictions that propagate profile-likelihood-based confidence sets for model parameters to predictions, explicitly isolating how different parameter combinations affect model predictions. Combining profile-wise prediction confidence sets gives an overall prediction confidence set that efficiently approximates the full likelihood-based prediction confidence set. Three case studies, focusing on canonical mathematical models used in biology and ecology, illustrate various aspects of the workflow for commonly-encountered ODE-based mechanistic models with both Gaussian and non-Gaussian measurement error.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J Simpson & Oliver J Maclaren, 2023. "Profile-Wise Analysis: A profile likelihood-based workflow for identifiability analysis, estimation, and prediction with mechanistic mathematical models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-31, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011515
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011515
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011515&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikael Sunnåker & Alberto Giovanni Busetto & Elina Numminen & Jukka Corander & Matthieu Foll & Christophe Dessimoz, 2013. "Approximate Bayesian Computation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    2. Jonah Gabry & Daniel Simpson & Aki Vehtari & Michael Betancourt & Andrew Gelman, 2019. "Visualization in Bayesian workflow," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 182(2), pages 389-402, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:enzgs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Brian Hartley, 2020. "Corridor stability of the Kaleckian growth model: a Markov-switching approach," Working Papers 2013, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2020.
    3. George Karabatsos, 2023. "Approximate Bayesian computation using asymptotically normal point estimates," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 531-568, June.
    4. Barakat, Bilal Fouad & Dharamshi, Ameer & Alkema, Leontine & Antoninis, Manos, 2021. "Adjusted Bayesian Completion Rates (ABC) Estimation," SocArXiv at368, Center for Open Science.
    5. David J Price & Alexandre Breuzé & Richard Dybowski & Piero Mastroeni & Olivier Restif, 2017. "An efficient moments-based inference method for within-host bacterial infection dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Perepolkin, Dmytro & Goodrich, Benjamin & Sahlin, Ullrika, 2023. "The tenets of quantile-based inference in Bayesian models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. Daniel Silk & Paul D W Kirk & Chris P Barnes & Tina Toni & Michael P H Stumpf, 2014. "Model Selection in Systems Biology Depends on Experimental Design," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Frederick Callaway & Antonio Rangel & Thomas L Griffiths, 2021. "Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-29, March.
    9. Ilaria Pia & Elina Numminen & Lari Veneranta & Jarno Vanhatalo, 2025. "Spatially Explicit Model to Disentangle Effects of Environment on Annual Fish Reproduction," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(2), March.
    10. Aushev, Alexander & Pesonen, Henri & Heinonen, Markus & Corander, Jukka & Kaski, Samuel, 2022. "Likelihood-free inference with deep Gaussian processes," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Brian Hartley, 2022. "Episodic incidence of Harrodian instability and the Kaleckian growth model: A Markov‐switching approach," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 268-290, February.
    12. Andrew J Tanentzap & Samuel Cottingham & Jérémy Fonvielle & Isobel Riley & Lucy M Walker & Samuel G Woodman & Danai Kontou & Christian M Pichler & Erwin Reisner & Laurent Lebreton, 2021. "Microplastics and anthropogenic fibre concentrations in lakes reflect surrounding land use," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Karan Bhuwalka & Eunseo Choi & Elizabeth A. Moore & Richard Roth & Randolph E. Kirchain & Elsa A. Olivetti, 2023. "A hierarchical Bayesian regression model that reduces uncertainty in material demand predictions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 43-55, February.
    14. Michael Lebacher & Göran Kauermann, 2024. "Regression‐based network‐flow and inner‐matrix reconstruction," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 51(4), pages 1730-1748, December.
    15. repec:plo:pgen00:1004185 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Malte Knuppel & Fabian Kruger & Marc-Oliver Pohle, 2022. "Score-based calibration testing for multivariate forecast distributions," Papers 2211.16362, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    17. repec:plo:pcbi00:1006137 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jonathan U Harrison & Ruth E Baker, 2020. "An automatic adaptive method to combine summary statistics in approximate Bayesian computation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, August.
    19. repec:osf:osfxxx:fzqxv_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Andrea L Liebl & Jeff S Wesner & Andrew F Russell & Aaron W Schrey, 2021. "Methylation patterns at fledging predict delayed dispersal in a cooperatively breeding bird," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, June.
    21. Bernard Baffour & Sumonkanti Das & Mu Li & Alice Richardson, 2024. "The Utility of Socioeconomic and Remoteness Indicators in Understanding the Geographical Variation in the Regional Prevalence of Early Childhood Vulnerability in Australia," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 17(4), pages 1791-1827, August.
    22. Matthias Kloft & Raphael Hartmann & Andreas Voss & Daniel W. Heck, 2023. "The Dirichlet Dual Response Model: An Item Response Model for Continuous Bounded Interval Responses," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 888-916, September.
    23. Felipe Maia Polo, 2020. "Skills to not fall behind in school," Papers 2001.10519, arXiv.org.
    24. Hazra, Indranil & Pandey, Mahesh D. & Manzana, Noldainerick, 2020. "Approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) method for estimating parameters of the gamma process using noisy data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.