IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1011484.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A role for cortical interneurons as adversarial discriminators

Author

Listed:
  • Ari S Benjamin
  • Konrad P Kording

Abstract

The brain learns representations of sensory information from experience, but the algorithms by which it does so remain unknown. One popular theory formalizes representations as inferred factors in a generative model of sensory stimuli, meaning that learning must improve this generative model and inference procedure. This framework underlies many classic computational theories of sensory learning, such as Boltzmann machines, the Wake/Sleep algorithm, and a more recent proposal that the brain learns with an adversarial algorithm that compares waking and dreaming activity. However, in order for such theories to provide insights into the cellular mechanisms of sensory learning, they must be first linked to the cell types in the brain that mediate them. In this study, we examine whether a subtype of cortical interneurons might mediate sensory learning by serving as discriminators, a crucial component in an adversarial algorithm for representation learning. We describe how such interneurons would be characterized by a plasticity rule that switches from Hebbian plasticity during waking states to anti-Hebbian plasticity in dreaming states. Evaluating the computational advantages and disadvantages of this algorithm, we find that it excels at learning representations in networks with recurrent connections but scales poorly with network size. This limitation can be partially addressed if the network also oscillates between evoked activity and generative samples on faster timescales. Consequently, we propose that an adversarial algorithm with interneurons as discriminators is a plausible and testable strategy for sensory learning in biological systems.Author summary: After raw sensory data is received at the periphery, it is transformed by various neural pathways and delivered to the sensory cortex. There, neural activity forms an internal model of the state of the external world, which is updated appropriately by new information. A goal of learning, then, is to learn how to transform information into the appropriate representational form within the brain’s internal model. Here, we look to artificial intelligence for new possible theories of how the brain might learn representations that resolve issues with previously proposed theories. We describe how one particular algorithm—adversarial learning—resolves a major issue with previous hypotheses relating to recurrence. Furthermore, this algorithm resembles broad features of the organization and learning dynamics of the brain, such as wake and sleep cycles. Considering seriously how this algorithm would appear if implemented by the brain, we map its features to known physiology and make testable predictions for how neural circuits learn new representations of information.

Suggested Citation

  • Ari S Benjamin & Konrad P Kording, 2023. "A role for cortical interneurons as adversarial discriminators," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011484
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011484
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011484&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011484?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew E. Larkum & J. Julius Zhu & Bert Sakmann, 1999. "A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers," Nature, Nature, vol. 398(6725), pages 338-341, March.
    2. Lars Buesing & Johannes Bill & Bernhard Nessler & Wolfgang Maass, 2011. "Neural Dynamics as Sampling: A Model for Stochastic Computation in Recurrent Networks of Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-22, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Jan C. Frankowski & Alexa Tierno & Shreya Pavani & Quincy Cao & David C. Lyon & Robert F. Hunt, 2022. "Brain-wide reconstruction of inhibitory circuits after traumatic brain injury," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Oren Amsalem & Hidehiko Inagaki & Jianing Yu & Karel Svoboda & Ran Darshan, 2024. "Sub-threshold neuronal activity and the dynamical regime of cerebral cortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Wen-Hao Zhang & Si Wu & Krešimir Josić & Brent Doiron, 2023. "Sampling-based Bayesian inference in recurrent circuits of stochastic spiking neurons," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Arjun A. Bhaskaran & Théo Gauvrit & Yukti Vyas & Guillaume Bony & Melanie Ginger & Andreas Frick, 2023. "Endogenous noise of neocortical neurons correlates with atypical sensory response variability in the Fmr1−/y mouse model of autism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Yang Qi & Pulin Gong, 2022. "Fractional neural sampling as a theory of spatiotemporal probabilistic computations in neural circuits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Giuseppe Chindemi & Marwan Abdellah & Oren Amsalem & Ruth Benavides-Piccione & Vincent Delattre & Michael Doron & András Ecker & Aurélien T. Jaquier & James King & Pramod Kumbhar & Caitlin Monney & Ro, 2022. "A calcium-based plasticity model for predicting long-term potentiation and depression in the neocortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Lieder, Falk & Griffiths, Tom & Hsu, Ming, 2016. "Over-representation of extreme events in decision-making reflects rational use of cognitive resources," OSF Preprints kxxag, Center for Open Science.
    9. Pojeong Park & J. David Wong-Campos & Daniel G. Itkis & Byung Hun Lee & Yitong Qi & Hunter C. Davis & Benjamin Antin & Amol Pasarkar & Jonathan B. Grimm & Sarah E. Plutkis & Katie L. Holland & Liam Pa, 2025. "Dendritic excitations govern back-propagation via a spike-rate accelerometer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Robert Legenstein & Wolfgang Maass, 2014. "Ensembles of Spiking Neurons with Noise Support Optimal Probabilistic Inference in a Dynamically Changing Environment," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, October.
    11. repec:osf:osfxxx:kxxag_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Dejan Pecevski & Lars Buesing & Wolfgang Maass, 2011. "Probabilistic Inference in General Graphical Models through Sampling in Stochastic Networks of Spiking Neurons," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-25, December.
    13. Shan Shen & Xiaolong Jiang & Federico Scala & Jiakun Fu & Paul Fahey & Dmitry Kobak & Zhenghuan Tan & Na Zhou & Jacob Reimer & Fabian Sinz & Andreas S. Tolias, 2022. "Distinct organization of two cortico-cortical feedback pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. repec:plo:pone00:0043654 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Bernhard Nessler & Michael Pfeiffer & Lars Buesing & Wolfgang Maass, 2013. "Bayesian Computation Emerges in Generic Cortical Microcircuits through Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-30, April.
    16. Etay Hay & Sean Hill & Felix Schürmann & Henry Markram & Idan Segev, 2011. "Models of Neocortical Layer 5b Pyramidal Cells Capturing a Wide Range of Dendritic and Perisomatic Active Properties," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(7), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Richard D Lange & Ankani Chattoraj & Jeffrey M Beck & Jacob L Yates & Ralf M Haefner, 2021. "A confirmation bias in perceptual decision-making due to hierarchical approximate inference," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-30, November.
    18. Stefan Habenschuss & Zeno Jonke & Wolfgang Maass, 2013. "Stochastic Computations in Cortical Microcircuit Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-28, November.
    19. Pierre Yger & Kenneth D Harris, 2013. "The Convallis Rule for Unsupervised Learning in Cortical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Jingwei Sun & Jian Li & Hang Zhang, 2019. "Human representation of multimodal distributions as clusters of samples," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-29, May.
    21. Jörg Bornschein & Marc Henniges & Jörg Lücke, 2013. "Are V1 Simple Cells Optimized for Visual Occlusions? A Comparative Study," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(6), pages 1-16, June.
    22. repec:plo:pcbi00:1006757 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Sourav Dutta & Georgios Detorakis & Abhishek Khanna & Benjamin Grisafe & Emre Neftci & Suman Datta, 2022. "Neural sampling machine with stochastic synapse allows brain-like learning and inference," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1011484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.