IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Convallis Rule for Unsupervised Learning in Cortical Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Yger
  • Kenneth D Harris

Abstract

The phenomenology and cellular mechanisms of cortical synaptic plasticity are becoming known in increasing detail, but the computational principles by which cortical plasticity enables the development of sensory representations are unclear. Here we describe a framework for cortical synaptic plasticity termed the “Convallis rule”, mathematically derived from a principle of unsupervised learning via constrained optimization. Implementation of the rule caused a recurrent cortex-like network of simulated spiking neurons to develop rate representations of real-world speech stimuli, enabling classification by a downstream linear decoder. Applied to spike patterns used in in vitro plasticity experiments, the rule reproduced multiple results including and beyond STDP. However STDP alone produced poorer learning performance. The mathematical form of the rule is consistent with a dual coincidence detector mechanism that has been suggested by experiments in several synaptic classes of juvenile neocortex. Based on this confluence of normative, phenomenological, and mechanistic evidence, we suggest that the rule may approximate a fundamental computational principle of the neocortex.Author Summary: The circuits of the sensory cortex are able to extract useful information from sensory inputs because of their exquisitely organized synaptic connections. These connections are wired largely through experience-dependent synaptic plasticity. Although many details of both the phenomena and cellular mechanisms of cortical synaptic plasticity are now known, an understanding of the computational principles by which synaptic plasticity wires cortical networks lags far behind this experimental data. In this study, we provide a theoretical framework for cortical plasticity termed the “Convallis rule”. The computational power of this rule is demonstrated by its ability to cause simulated cortical networks to learn representations of real-world speech data. Application of the rule to paradigms used to probe synaptic plasticity in vitro reproduced a large number of experimental findings, and the mathematical form of the rule is consistent with a dual coincidence detector mechanism that has been suggested experimentally in juvenile neocortex. Based on this confluence of normative, phenomenological, and mechanistic evidence, we suggest that the rule may approximate a fundamental computational principle of the neocortex.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Yger & Kenneth D Harris, 2013. "The Convallis Rule for Unsupervised Learning in Cortical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003272
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003272
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003272&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho Ko & Lee Cossell & Chiara Baragli & Jan Antolik & Claudia Clopath & Sonja B. Hofer & Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel, 2013. "The emergence of functional microcircuits in visual cortex," Nature, Nature, vol. 496(7443), pages 96-100, April.
    2. Gina G. Turrigiano & Kenneth R. Leslie & Niraj S. Desai & Lana C. Rutherford & Sacha B. Nelson, 1998. "Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons," Nature, Nature, vol. 391(6670), pages 892-896, February.
    3. Matthew E. Larkum & J. Julius Zhu & Bert Sakmann, 1999. "A new cellular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers," Nature, Nature, vol. 398(6725), pages 338-341, March.
    4. Robert C. Froemke & Yang Dan, 2002. "Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains," Nature, Nature, vol. 416(6879), pages 433-438, March.
    5. Makoto Nishiyama & Kyonsoo Hong & Katsuhiko Mikoshiba & Mu-ming Poo & Kunio Kato, 2000. "Calcium stores regulate the polarity and input specificity of synaptic modification," Nature, Nature, vol. 408(6812), pages 584-588, November.
    6. Ho Ko & Sonja B. Hofer & Bruno Pichler & Katherine A. Buchanan & P. Jesper Sjöström & Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel, 2011. "Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 473(7345), pages 87-91, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanyun Ren & Xiaobo Bu & Ming Wang & Yue Gong & Junjie Wang & Yuyang Yang & Guijun Li & Meng Zhang & Ye Zhou & Su-Ting Han, 2022. "Synaptic plasticity in self-powered artificial striate cortex for binocular orientation selectivity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gabriel Koch Ocker & Ashok Litwin-Kumar & Brent Doiron, 2015. "Self-Organization of Microcircuits in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Plastic Synapses," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-40, August.
    2. Matteo Farinella & Daniel T Ruedt & Padraig Gleeson & Frederic Lanore & R Angus Silver, 2014. "Glutamate-Bound NMDARs Arising from In Vivo-like Network Activity Extend Spatio-temporal Integration in a L5 Cortical Pyramidal Cell Model," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Suchin S Gururangan & Alexander J Sadovsky & Jason N MacLean, 2014. "Analysis of Graph Invariants in Functional Neocortical Circuitry Reveals Generalized Features Common to Three Areas of Sensory Cortex," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Dimitri Yatsenko & Krešimir Josić & Alexander S Ecker & Emmanouil Froudarakis & R James Cotton & Andreas S Tolias, 2015. "Improved Estimation and Interpretation of Correlations in Neural Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Sadra Sadeh & Stefan Rotter, 2015. "Orientation Selectivity in Inhibition-Dominated Networks of Spiking Neurons: Effect of Single Neuron Properties and Network Dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Bettina Voelcker & Ravi Pancholi & Simon Peron, 2022. "Transformation of primary sensory cortical representations from layer 4 to layer 2," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Jan C. Frankowski & Alexa Tierno & Shreya Pavani & Quincy Cao & David C. Lyon & Robert F. Hunt, 2022. "Brain-wide reconstruction of inhibitory circuits after traumatic brain injury," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Giulia Faini & Dimitrii Tanese & Clément Molinier & Cécile Telliez & Massilia Hamdani & Francois Blot & Christophe Tourain & Vincent Sars & Filippo Bene & Benoît C. Forget & Emiliano Ronzitti & Valent, 2023. "Ultrafast light targeting for high-throughput precise control of neuronal networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Arjun A. Bhaskaran & Théo Gauvrit & Yukti Vyas & Guillaume Bony & Melanie Ginger & Andreas Frick, 2023. "Endogenous noise of neocortical neurons correlates with atypical sensory response variability in the Fmr1−/y mouse model of autism," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Matteo Saponati & Martin Vinck, 2023. "Sequence anticipation and spike-timing-dependent plasticity emerge from a predictive learning rule," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Christopher Ebsch & Robert Rosenbaum, 2018. "Imbalanced amplification: A mechanism of amplification and suppression from local imbalance of excitation and inhibition in cortical circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Niranjan Chakravarthy & Shivkumar Sabesan & Kostas Tsakalis & Leon Iasemidis, 2009. "Controlling epileptic seizures in a neural mass model," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 98-116, January.
    13. Giuseppe Chindemi & Marwan Abdellah & Oren Amsalem & Ruth Benavides-Piccione & Vincent Delattre & Michael Doron & András Ecker & Aurélien T. Jaquier & James King & Pramod Kumbhar & Caitlin Monney & Ro, 2022. "A calcium-based plasticity model for predicting long-term potentiation and depression in the neocortex," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Yu, Haitao & Guo, Xinmeng & Wang, Jiang & Deng, Bin & Wei, Xile, 2015. "Vibrational resonance in adaptive small-world neuronal networks with spike-timing-dependent plasticity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 436(C), pages 170-179.
    15. Damien M O’Halloran, 2020. "Simulation model of CA1 pyramidal neurons reveal opposing roles for the Na+/Ca2+ exchange current and Ca2+-activated K+ current during spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, March.
    16. Brian B. Jeon & Thomas Fuchs & Steven M. Chase & Sandra J. Kuhlman, 2022. "Existing function in primary visual cortex is not perturbed by new skill acquisition of a non-matched sensory task," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Yoav Printz & Pritish Patil & Mathias Mahn & Asaf Benjamin & Anna Litvin & Rivka Levy & Max Bringmann & Ofer Yizhar, 2023. "Determinants of functional synaptic connectivity among amygdala-projecting prefrontal cortical neurons in male mice," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Yu, Haitao & Guo, Xinmeng & Wang, Jiang & Deng, Bin & Wei, Xile, 2015. "Spike coherence and synchronization on Newman–Watts small-world neuronal networks modulated by spike-timing-dependent plasticity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 419(C), pages 307-317.
    19. Sacha Jennifer van Albada & Moritz Helias & Markus Diesmann, 2015. "Scalability of Asynchronous Networks Is Limited by One-to-One Mapping between Effective Connectivity and Correlations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-37, September.
    20. Yanyun Ren & Xiaobo Bu & Ming Wang & Yue Gong & Junjie Wang & Yuyang Yang & Guijun Li & Meng Zhang & Ye Zhou & Su-Ting Han, 2022. "Synaptic plasticity in self-powered artificial striate cortex for binocular orientation selectivity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.