IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010954.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ten simple rules for socially responsible science

Author

Listed:
  • Alon Zivony
  • Rasha Kardosh
  • Liadh Timmins
  • Niv Reggev

Abstract

Guidelines concerning the potentially harmful effects of scientific studies have historically focused on ethical considerations for minimizing risk for participants. However, studies can also indirectly inflict harm on individuals and social groups through how they are designed, reported, and disseminated. As evidenced by recent criticisms and retractions of high-profile studies dealing with a wide variety of social issues, there is a scarcity of resources and guidance on how one can conduct research in a socially responsible manner. As such, even motivated researchers might publish work that has negative social impacts due to a lack of awareness. To address this, we propose 10 simple rules for researchers who wish to conduct socially responsible science. These rules, which cover major considerations throughout the life cycle of a study from inception to dissemination, are not aimed as a prescriptive list or a deterministic code of conduct. Rather, they are meant to help motivated scientists to reflect on their social responsibility as researchers and actively engage with the potential social impact of their research.

Suggested Citation

  • Alon Zivony & Rasha Kardosh & Liadh Timmins & Niv Reggev, 2023. "Ten simple rules for socially responsible science," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010954
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010954
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010954&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De keersmaecker, Jonas & Roets, Arne, 2017. "‘Fake news’: Incorrect, but hard to correct. The role of cognitive ability on the impact of false information on social impressions," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 107-110.
    2. Bedoor AlShebli & Kinga Makovi & Talal Rahwan, 2020. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Logg, Jennifer M. & Dorison, Charles A., 2021. "Pre-registration: Weighing costs and benefits for researchers," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 18-27.
    4. Lou Safra & Coralie Chevallier & Julie Grèzes & Nicolas Baumard, 2020. "Tracking historical changes in perceived trustworthiness in Western Europe using machine learning analyses of facial cues in paintings," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-7, December.
    5. Bedoor AlShebli & Kinga Makovi & Talal Rahwan, 2020. "Retraction Note: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-1, December.
    6. repec:plo:pbio00:2004089 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silva Goncalves, Juliana & van Veldhuizen, Roel, 2020. "Subjective Judgment and Gender Bias in Advice: Evidence from the Laboratory," Working Papers 2020:27, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    2. Xie, Qing & Zhang, Xinyuan & Kim, Giyeong & Song, Min, 2022. "Exploring the influence of coauthorship with top scientists on researchers’ affiliation, research topic, productivity, and impact," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    3. Zhu, Yongjun & Kim, Donghun & Jiang, Ting & Zhao, Yi & He, Jiangen & Chen, Xinyi & Lou, Wen, 2024. "Dependency, reciprocity, and informal mentorship in predicting long-term research collaboration: A co-authorship matrix-based multivariate time series analysis," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1).
    4. Yinqi Ma & Qi Xiu & Lingzhi Shao & Hao Yao, 2022. "Promoting the Sustainable Improvement of Educational Empirical Research Quality: What Kinds of Collaborative Production Relationships Make Sense?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Kelly G. Hagen & Carrie Wolinetz & Janine A. Clayton & Marie A. Bernard, 2022. "Community voices: NIH working toward inclusive excellence by promoting and supporting women in science," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-4, December.
    6. Sarah W Davies & Hollie M Putnam & Tracy Ainsworth & Julia K Baum & Colleen B Bove & Sarah C Crosby & Isabelle M Côté & Anne Duplouy & Robinson W Fulweiler & Alyssa J Griffin & Torrance C Hanley & Tes, 2021. "Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Tehmina Amjad & Javeria Munir, 2021. "Investigating the impact of collaboration with authority authors: a case study of bibliographic data in field of philosophy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 4333-4353, May.
    8. Emre Özel, 2024. "What is Gender Bias in Grant Peer review?," Working Papers halshs-03862027, HAL.
    9. Léonard Guillou & Lou Safra & Nicolas Baumard, 2023. "Using portraits to quantify the changes of generalized social trust in European history: A replication study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Yip, Jeremy A. & Schweitzer, Maurice E., 2022. "Norms for Behavioral Change (NBC) model: How injunctive norms and enforcement shift descriptive norms in science," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    11. Heckelei, Thomas & Huettel, Silke & Odening, Martin & Rommel, Jens, 2021. "The replicability crisis and the p-value debate – what are the consequences for the agricultural and food economics community?," Discussion Papers 316369, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    12. Dorsaf Sallami & Esma Aïmeur, 2025. "Exploring beyond detection: a review on fake news prevention and mitigation techniques," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-38, February.
    13. Edgar Dubourg & Rayan Safa & Valentin Thouzeau & Nicolas Baumard, 2025. "Charting the rise of imaginary worlds in history," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Meng Zhen Larsen & Michael R. Haupt & Tiana McMann & Raphael E. Cuomo & Tim K. Mackey, 2023. "The Influence of News Consumption Habits and Dispositional Traits on Trust in Medical Scientists," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Alexandre Hyafil & Nicolas Baumard, 2022. "Evoked and transmitted culture models: Using bayesian methods to infer the evolution of cultural traits in history," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-21, April.
    16. João Pedro Baptista & Anabela Gradim, 2020. "Understanding Fake News Consumption: A Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Kiran Sharma & Satyam Mukherjee, 2024. "The ripple effect of retraction on an author’s collaboration network," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(2), pages 1519-1531, October.
    18. G. F. Vaccaro-Witt & Hilaria Bernal & Sergio Guerra Heredia & F. E. Cabrera & J. I. Peláez, 2025. "Effect of Informational Divergence on the Mental Health of the Population in Crisis Situations: A Study in COVID-19," Societies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, April.
    19. João Pedro Baptista & Elisete Correia & Anabela Gradim & Valeriano Piñeiro-Naval, 2021. "The Influence of Political Ideology on Fake News Belief: The Portuguese Case," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Brydges, Christopher R. & Gignac, Gilles E. & Ecker, Ullrich K.H., 2018. "Working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, and the continued influence effect: A latent-variable analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 117-122.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.