IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1010880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling daily weight variation in honey bee hives

Author

Listed:
  • Karina Arias-Calluari
  • Theotime Colin
  • Tanya Latty
  • Mary Myerscough
  • Eduardo G Altmann

Abstract

A quantitative understanding of the dynamics of bee colonies is important to support global efforts to improve bee health and enhance pollination services. Traditional approaches focus either on theoretical models or data-centred statistical analyses. Here we argue that the combination of these two approaches is essential to obtain interpretable information on the state of bee colonies and show how this can be achieved in the case of time series of intra-day weight variation. We model how the foraging and food processing activities of bees affect global hive weight through a set of ordinary differential equations and show how to estimate the parameters of this model from measurements on a single day. Our analysis of 10 hives at different times shows that the estimation of crucial indicators of the health of honey bee colonies are statistically reliable and fall in ranges compatible with previously reported results. The crucial indicators, which include the amount of food collected (foraging success) and the number of active foragers, may be used to develop early warning indicators of colony failure.Author summary: Honey bees are under threat and dying at an alarming rate due to pesticides, parasites, and other stressors. Obtaining information about the health of bee colonies is essential to understand how this happens and to identify measures that can prevent this from happening. Herein, we built a mathematical model of the daily dynamics of hives that allows such information to be extracted without detailed and expensive measurements. Based only on measurements of how the weight of the hive changes during the day, our model can be used to estimate how many bees are collecting food, how successful they are, and how much time they spend outside the hive. Due to its simplicity, the model presented here can be applied to a wide range of hive scale systems and help beekeepers track how healthy and productive their bees are.

Suggested Citation

  • Karina Arias-Calluari & Theotime Colin & Tanya Latty & Mary Myerscough & Eduardo G Altmann, 2023. "Modelling daily weight variation in honey bee hives," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-22, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010880
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010880
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010880&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William G Meikle & Niels Holst & Théotime Colin & Milagra Weiss & Mark J Carroll & Quinn S McFrederick & Andrew B Barron, 2018. "Using within-day hive weight changes to measure environmental effects on honey bee colonies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Gary D. Powney & Claire Carvell & Mike Edwards & Roger K. A. Morris & Helen E. Roy & Ben A. Woodcock & Nick J. B. Isaac, 2019. "Widespread losses of pollinating insects in Britain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-6, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Melissa Guzman & Elizabeth Elle & Lora A. Morandin & Neil S. Cobb & Paige R. Chesshire & Lindsie M. McCabe & Alice Hughes & Michael Orr & Leithen K. M’Gonigle, 2024. "Impact of pesticide use on wild bee distributions across the United States," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(10), pages 1324-1334, October.
    2. James M. W. Ryalls & Jacob Bishop & Adedayo O. Mofikoya & Lisa M. Bromfield & Shinichi Nakagawa & Robbie D. Girling, 2024. "Air pollution disproportionately impairs beneficial invertebrates: a meta-analysis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Blaydes, H. & Potts, S.G. & Whyatt, J.D. & Armstrong, A., 2021. "Opportunities to enhance pollinator biodiversity in solar parks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Georgios Nakas & Konstantinos Kougioumoutzis & Theodora Petanidou, 2023. "Short- and Mid-Term Spatiotemporal Diversity Patterns of Post-Fire Insect-Pollinated Plant Communities in the Mediterranean," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Coby van Dooremalen & Frank van Langevelde, 2021. "Can Colony Size of Honeybees ( Apis mellifera ) Be Used as Predictor for Colony Losses Due to Varroa destructor during Winter?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Connor M. French & Laura D. Bertola & Ana C. Carnaval & Evan P. Economo & Jamie M. Kass & David J. Lohman & Katharine A. Marske & Rudolf Meier & Isaac Overcast & Andrew J. Rominger & Phillip P. A. Sta, 2023. "Global determinants of insect mitochondrial genetic diversity," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Boyd, Robin J. & Bowler, Diana E. & Isaac, Nick J.B. & Pescott, Oliver L., 2024. "On the trade-off between accuracy and spatial resolution when estimating species occupancy from geographically biased samples," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 493(C).
    8. Betti, Matthew I. & Lee, Isaac, 2020. "The effects of diploid male production on honey bee colony evolution and survival," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 49-55.
    9. Martin Šlachta & Tomáš Erban & Alena Votavová & Tomáš Bešta & Michal Skalský & Marta Václavíková & Taťána Halešová & Magda Edwards-Jonášová & Renata Včeláková & Pavel Cudlín, 2020. "Domestic Gardens Mitigate Risk of Exposure of Pollinators to Pesticides—An Urban-Rural Case Study Using a Red Mason Bee Species for Biomonitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Maderson, Siobhan, 2023. "Co-producing agricultural policy with beekeepers: Obstacles and opportunities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    11. Bin Han & Jiangli Wu & Qiaohong Wei & Fengying Liu & Lihong Cui & Olav Rueppell & Shufa Xu, 2024. "Life-history stage determines the diet of ectoparasitic mites on their honey bee hosts," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. William G Meikle & Vanessa Corby-Harris & Mark J Carroll & Milagra Weiss & Lucy A Snyder & Charlotte A D Meador & Eli Beren & Nicholas Brown, 2019. "Exposure to sublethal concentrations of methoxyfenozide disrupts honey bee colony activity and thermoregulation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Stefanie Christmann & Youssef Bencharki & Soukaina Anougmar & Pierre Rasmont & Moulay Chrif Smaili & Athanasios Tsivelikas & Aden Aw-Hassan, 2021. "Farming with Alternative Pollinators benefits pollinators, natural enemies, and yields, and offers transformative change to agriculture," Post-Print hal-03355596, HAL.
    14. Wu-Bing Xu & Shane A. Blowes & Viviana Brambilla & Cher F. Y. Chow & Ada Fontrodona-Eslava & Inês S. Martins & Daniel McGlinn & Faye Moyes & Alban Sagouis & Hideyasu Shimadzu & Roel Klink & Anne E. Ma, 2023. "Regional occupancy increases for widespread species but decreases for narrowly distributed species in metacommunity time series," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Stock, Michiel & Piot, Niels & Vanbesien, Sarah & Meys, Joris & Smagghe, Guy & De Baets, Bernard, 2021. "Pairwise learning for predicting pollination interactions based on traits and phylogeny," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 451(C).
    16. Image, Mike & Gardner, Emma & Breeze, Tom D., 2023. "Co-benefits from tree planting in a typical English agricultural landscape: Comparing the relative effectiveness of hedgerows, agroforestry and woodland creation for improving crop pollination service," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1010880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.