IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1007665.html

CAncer bioMarker Prediction Pipeline (CAMPP)—A standardized framework for the analysis of quantitative biological data

Author

Listed:
  • Thilde Terkelsen
  • Anders Krogh
  • Elena Papaleo

Abstract

With the improvement of -omics and next-generation sequencing (NGS) methodologies, along with the lowered cost of generating these types of data, the analysis of high-throughput biological data has become standard both for forming and testing biomedical hypotheses. Our knowledge of how to normalize datasets to remove latent undesirable variances has grown extensively, making for standardized data that are easily compared between studies. Here we present the CAncer bioMarker Prediction Pipeline (CAMPP), an open-source R-based wrapper (https://github.com/ELELAB/CAncer-bioMarker-Prediction-Pipeline -CAMPP) intended to aid bioinformatic software-users with data analyses. CAMPP is called from a terminal command line and is supported by a user-friendly manual. The pipeline may be run on a local computer and requires little or no knowledge of programming. To avoid issues relating to R-package updates, a renv .lock file is provided to ensure R-package stability. Data-management includes missing value imputation, data normalization, and distributional checks. CAMPP performs (I) k-means clustering, (II) differential expression/abundance analysis, (III) elastic-net regression, (IV) correlation and co-expression network analyses, (V) survival analysis, and (VI) protein-protein/miRNA-gene interaction networks. The pipeline returns tabular files and graphical representations of the results. We hope that CAMPP will assist in streamlining bioinformatic analysis of quantitative biological data, whilst ensuring an appropriate bio-statistical framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Thilde Terkelsen & Anders Krogh & Elena Papaleo, 2020. "CAncer bioMarker Prediction Pipeline (CAMPP)—A standardized framework for the analysis of quantitative biological data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007665
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007665
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007665&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey T Leek & John D Storey, 2007. "Capturing Heterogeneity in Gene Expression Studies by Surrogate Variable Analysis," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(9), pages 1-12, September.
    2. Hai-Hui Huang & Xiao-Ying Liu & Yong Liang, 2016. "Feature Selection and Cancer Classification via Sparse Logistic Regression with the Hybrid L1/2 +2 Regularization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Friedman, Jerome H. & Hastie, Trevor & Tibshirani, Rob, 2010. "Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 33(i01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blum Yuna & Houée-Bigot Magalie & Causeur David, 2016. "Sparse factor model for co-expression networks with an application using prior biological knowledge," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 15(3), pages 253-272, June.
    2. Xia Zheng & Yaohua Rong & Ling Liu & Weihu Cheng, 2021. "A More Accurate Estimation of Semiparametric Logistic Regression," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Zakariya Yahya Algamal & Muhammad Hisyam Lee, 2019. "A two-stage sparse logistic regression for optimal gene selection in high-dimensional microarray data classification," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(3), pages 753-771, September.
    4. Arezo Torang & Aleksandar B. Kirov & Veerle Lammers & Kate Cameron & Valérie M. Wouters & Rene F. Jackstadt & Tamsin R. M. Lannagan & Joan H. Jong & Jan Koster & Owen Sansom & Jan Paul Medema, 2025. "Enterocyte-like differentiation defines metabolic gene signatures of CMS3 colorectal cancers and provides therapeutic vulnerability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Zhao, Xun & Tang, Lu & Zhang, Weijia & Zhou, Ling, 2025. "Subgroup learning for multiple mixed-type outcomes with block-structured covariates," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    6. Tutz, Gerhard & Pößnecker, Wolfgang & Uhlmann, Lorenz, 2015. "Variable selection in general multinomial logit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 207-222.
    7. Gareth Harman & Dakota Kliamovich & Angelica M Morales & Sydney Gilbert & Deanna M Barch & Michael A Mooney & Sarah W Feldstein Ewing & Damien A Fair & Bonnie J Nagel, 2021. "Prediction of suicidal ideation and attempt in 9 and 10 year-old children using transdiagnostic risk features," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Viet Hoang Dinh & Didier Nibbering & Benjamin Wong, 2023. "Random Subspace Local Projections," CAMA Working Papers 2023-34, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    9. Ernesto Carrella & Richard M. Bailey & Jens Koed Madsen, 2018. "Indirect inference through prediction," Papers 1807.01579, arXiv.org.
    10. Kaspar Wuthrich & Ying Zhu, 2019. "Omitted variable bias of Lasso-based inference methods: A finite sample analysis," Papers 1903.08704, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    11. Rui Wang & Naihua Xiu & Kim-Chuan Toh, 2021. "Subspace quadratic regularization method for group sparse multinomial logistic regression," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 79(3), pages 531-559, July.
    12. Mkhadri, Abdallah & Ouhourane, Mohamed, 2013. "An extended variable inclusion and shrinkage algorithm for correlated variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 631-644.
    13. Yuto Hasegawa & Juhyun Kim & Gianluca Ursini & Yan Jouroukhin & Xiaolei Zhu & Yu Miyahara & Feiyi Xiong & Samskruthi Madireddy & Mizuho Obayashi & Beat Lutz & Akira Sawa & Solange P. Brown & Mikhail V, 2023. "Microglial cannabinoid receptor type 1 mediates social memory deficits in mice produced by adolescent THC exposure and 16p11.2 duplication," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. David Kohns & Tibor Szendrei, 2021. "Decoupling Shrinkage and Selection for the Bayesian Quantile Regression," Papers 2107.08498, arXiv.org.
    15. Masakazu Higuchi & Mitsuteru Nakamura & Shuji Shinohara & Yasuhiro Omiya & Takeshi Takano & Daisuke Mizuguchi & Noriaki Sonota & Hiroyuki Toda & Taku Saito & Mirai So & Eiji Takayama & Hiroo Terashi &, 2022. "Detection of Major Depressive Disorder Based on a Combination of Voice Features: An Exploratory Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-13, September.
    16. Zou, Hongyu & Gao, Junyao & Wu, Wanchun & Huo, Lijuan & Zhang, Wei, 2024. "Which comes first? Comorbidity of depression and anxiety symptoms: A cross-lagged network analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    17. Bak, Kwan-Young & Jhong, Jae-Hwan & Lee, JungJun & Shin, Jae-Kyung & Koo, Ja-Yong, 2021. "Penalized logspline density estimation using total variation penalty," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    18. Vincent, Martin & Hansen, Niels Richard, 2014. "Sparse group lasso and high dimensional multinomial classification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 771-786.
    19. Michael Kostmann & Wolfgang K. Härdle, 2019. "Forecasting in Blockchain-Based Local Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-27, July.
    20. Chen, Le-Yu & Lee, Sokbae, 2018. "Best subset binary prediction," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 39-56.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1007665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.