IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1003781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logarithmic and Power Law Input-Output Relations in Sensory Systems with Fold-Change Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Miri Adler
  • Avi Mayo
  • Uri Alon

Abstract

Two central biophysical laws describe sensory responses to input signals. One is a logarithmic relationship between input and output, and the other is a power law relationship. These laws are sometimes called the Weber-Fechner law and the Stevens power law, respectively. The two laws are found in a wide variety of human sensory systems including hearing, vision, taste, and weight perception; they also occur in the responses of cells to stimuli. However the mechanistic origin of these laws is not fully understood. To address this, we consider a class of biological circuits exhibiting a property called fold-change detection (FCD). In these circuits the response dynamics depend only on the relative change in input signal and not its absolute level, a property which applies to many physiological and cellular sensory systems. We show analytically that by changing a single parameter in the FCD circuits, both logarithmic and power-law relationships emerge; these laws are modified versions of the Weber-Fechner and Stevens laws. The parameter that determines which law is found is the steepness (effective Hill coefficient) of the effect of the internal variable on the output. This finding applies to major circuit architectures found in biological systems, including the incoherent feed-forward loop and nonlinear integral feedback loops. Therefore, if one measures the response to different fold changes in input signal and observes a logarithmic or power law, the present theory can be used to rule out certain FCD mechanisms, and to predict their cooperativity parameter. We demonstrate this approach using data from eukaryotic chemotaxis signaling.Author Summary: One of the first measurements an experimentalist makes to understand a sensory system is to explore the relation between input signal and the systems response amplitude. Here, we show using mathematical models that this measurement can give important clues about the possible mechanism of sensing. We use models that incorporate the nearly-universal features of sensory systems, including hearing and vision, and the sensing pathways of individual cells. These nearly-universal features include exact adaptation-the ability to ignore prolonged input stimuli and return to basal activity, and fold-change detection- response to relative changes in input, not absolute changes. Together with information on the input-output relationship-e.g. is it a logarithmic or a power law relationship-we show that these conditions provide enough constraints to allow the researcher to reject certain circuit designs; it also predicts, if one assumes a given design, one of its key parameters. This study can thus help unify our understanding of sensory systems, and help pinpoint the possible biological circuits based on physiological measurements.

Suggested Citation

  • Miri Adler & Avi Mayo & Uri Alon, 2014. "Logarithmic and Power Law Input-Output Relations in Sensory Systems with Fold-Change Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003781
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003781
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003781&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003781?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N. Barkai & S. Leibler, 1997. "Robustness in simple biochemical networks," Nature, Nature, vol. 387(6636), pages 913-917, June.
    2. U. Alon & M. G. Surette & N. Barkai & S. Leibler, 1999. "Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis," Nature, Nature, vol. 397(6715), pages 168-171, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luna Rizik & Loai Danial & Mouna Habib & Ron Weiss & Ramez Daniel, 2022. "Synthetic neuromorphic computing in living cells," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jae Kyoung Kim & Trachette L Jackson, 2013. "Mechanisms That Enhance Sustainability of p53 Pulses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, June.
    2. repec:plo:pcbi00:0030142 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. repec:plo:pcbi00:0030092 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Diana Clausznitzer & Olga Oleksiuk & Linda Løvdok & Victor Sourjik & Robert G Endres, 2010. "Chemotactic Response and Adaptation Dynamics in Escherichia coli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, May.
    5. Guillermo Rodrigo & Santiago F Elena, 2011. "Structural Discrimination of Robustness in Transcriptional Feedforward Loops for Pattern Formation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-7, February.
    6. repec:plo:pcbi00:1000242 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:plo:pbio00:0030343 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Robert M Cooper & Ned S Wingreen & Edward C Cox, 2012. "An Excitable Cortex and Memory Model Successfully Predicts New Pseudopod Dynamics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-12, March.
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0008001 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Junjie Luo & Jun Wang & Ting Martin Ma & Zhirong Sun, 2010. "Reverse Engineering of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway via Frequency Domain Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    11. Jinlong Yuan & Lei Wang & Xu Zhang & Enmin Feng & Hongchao Yin & Zhilong Xiu, 2015. "Parameter identification for a nonlinear enzyme-catalytic dynamic system with time-delays," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 791-810, August.
    12. Kirstin Meyer & Nicholas C. Lammers & Lukasz J. Bugaj & Hernan G. Garcia & Orion D. Weiner, 2023. "Optogenetic control of YAP reveals a dynamic communication code for stem cell fate and proliferation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Gabriele Micali & Gerardo Aquino & David M Richards & Robert G Endres, 2015. "Accurate Encoding and Decoding by Single Cells: Amplitude Versus Frequency Modulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Zeina Shreif & Vipul Periwal, 2014. "A Network Characteristic That Correlates Environmental and Genetic Robustness," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.
    15. repec:plo:pgen00:1000919 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Burton W Andrews & Tau-Mu Yi & Pablo A Iglesias, 2006. "Optimal Noise Filtering in the Chemotactic Response of Escherichia coli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-12, November.
    17. Diana Clausznitzer & Gabriele Micali & Silke Neumann & Victor Sourjik & Robert G Endres, 2014. "Predicting Chemical Environments of Bacteria from Receptor Signaling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    18. Robyn P. Araujo & Lance A. Liotta, 2023. "Universal structures for adaptation in biochemical reaction networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    19. repec:plo:pmed00:0030208 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. repec:plo:pone00:0087815 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Oliver Pohl & Marius Hintsche & Zahra Alirezaeizanjani & Maximilian Seyrich & Carsten Beta & Holger Stark, 2017. "Inferring the Chemotactic Strategy of P. putida and E. coli Using Modified Kramers-Moyal Coefficients," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    22. repec:plo:pcbi00:1005434 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. repec:plo:pone00:0036010 is not listed on IDEAS
    24. Payne, Joshua L., 2016. "No tradeoff between versatility and robustness in gene circuit motifs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 449(C), pages 192-199.
    25. Imke Spöring & Vincent A Martinez & Christian Hotz & Jana Schwarz-Linek & Keara L Grady & Josué M Nava-Sedeño & Teun Vissers & Hanna M Singer & Manfred Rohde & Carole Bourquin & Haralampos Hatzikirou , 2018. "Hook length of the bacterial flagellum is optimized for maximal stability of the flagellar bundle," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, September.
    26. repec:plo:pcbi00:1005878 is not listed on IDEAS
    27. repec:plo:pone00:0029716 is not listed on IDEAS
    28. Martin J. Falk & Adam T. Strupp & Benjamin Scellier & Arvind Murugan, 2025. "Temporal Contrastive Learning through implicit non-equilibrium memory," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    29. Jiang, Xiong-Fei & Xiong, Long & Bai, Ling & Lin, Jie & Zhang, Jing-Feng & Yan, Kun & Zhu, Jia-Zhen & Zheng, Bo & Zheng, Jian-Jun, 2022. "Structure and dynamics of human complication-disease network," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    30. Dong, Gaogao & Tian, Lixin & Du, Ruijin & Fu, Min & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2014. "Analysis of percolation behaviors of clustered networks with partial support–dependence relations," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 394(C), pages 370-378.
    31. Niklas Korsbo & Henrik Jönsson, 2020. "It’s about time: Analysing simplifying assumptions for modelling multi-step pathways in systems biology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-29, June.
    32. Jonathan R Karr & Alex H Williams & Jeremy D Zucker & Andreas Raue & Bernhard Steiert & Jens Timmer & Clemens Kreutz & DREAM8 Parameter Estimation Challenge Consortium & Simon Wilkinson & Brandon A Al, 2015. "Summary of the DREAM8 Parameter Estimation Challenge: Toward Parameter Identification for Whole-Cell Models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1003781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.