IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/2006989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hook length of the bacterial flagellum is optimized for maximal stability of the flagellar bundle

Author

Listed:
  • Imke Spöring
  • Vincent A Martinez
  • Christian Hotz
  • Jana Schwarz-Linek
  • Keara L Grady
  • Josué M Nava-Sedeño
  • Teun Vissers
  • Hanna M Singer
  • Manfred Rohde
  • Carole Bourquin
  • Haralampos Hatzikirou
  • Wilson C K Poon
  • Yann S Dufour
  • Marc Erhardt

Abstract

Most bacteria swim in liquid environments by rotating one or several flagella. The long external filament of the flagellum is connected to a membrane-embedded basal body by a flexible universal joint, the hook, which allows the transmission of motor torque to the filament. The length of the hook is controlled on a nanometer scale by a sophisticated molecular ruler mechanism. However, why its length is stringently controlled has remained elusive. We engineered and studied a diverse set of hook-length variants of Salmonella enterica. Measurements of plate-assay motility, single-cell swimming speed, and directional persistence in quasi-2D and population-averaged swimming speed and body angular velocity in 3D revealed that the motility performance is optimal around the wild-type hook length. We conclude that too-short hooks may be too stiff to function as a junction and too-long hooks may buckle and create instability in the flagellar bundle. Accordingly, peritrichously flagellated bacteria move most efficiently as the distance travelled per body rotation is maximal and body wobbling is minimized. Thus, our results suggest that the molecular ruler mechanism evolved to control flagellar hook growth to the optimal length consistent with efficient bundle formation. The hook-length control mechanism is therefore a prime example of how bacteria evolved elegant but robust mechanisms to maximize their fitness under specific environmental constraints.Author summary: Many bacteria use flagella for directed movement in liquid environments. The flexible hook connects the membrane-embedded basal body of the flagellum to the long, external filament. Flagellar function relies on self-assembly processes that define or self-limit the lengths of major parts. The length of the hook is precisely controlled on a nanometer scale by a molecular ruler mechanism. However, the physiological benefit of tight hook-length control remains unclear. Here, we show that the molecular ruler mechanism evolved to control the optimal length of the flagellar hook, which is consistent with efficient motility performance. These results highlight the evolutionary forces that enable flagellated bacteria to optimize their fitness in diverse environments and might have important implications for the design of swimming microrobots.

Suggested Citation

  • Imke Spöring & Vincent A Martinez & Christian Hotz & Jana Schwarz-Linek & Keara L Grady & Josué M Nava-Sedeño & Teun Vissers & Hanna M Singer & Manfred Rohde & Carole Bourquin & Haralampos Hatzikirou , 2018. "Hook length of the bacterial flagellum is optimized for maximal stability of the flagellar bundle," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:2006989
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006989
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2006989
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.2006989&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006989?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koushik Paul & Marc Erhardt & Takanori Hirano & David F. Blair & Kelly T. Hughes, 2008. "Energy source of flagellar type III secretion," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7177), pages 489-492, January.
    2. U. Alon & M. G. Surette & N. Barkai & S. Leibler, 1999. "Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis," Nature, Nature, vol. 397(6715), pages 168-171, January.
    3. Yann S Dufour & Sébastien Gillet & Nicholas W Frankel & Douglas B Weibel & Thierry Emonet, 2016. "Direct Correlation between Motile Behavior and Protein Abundance in Single Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Fadel A. Samatey & Hideyuki Matsunami & Katsumi Imada & Shigehiro Nagashima & Tanvir R. Shaikh & Dennis R. Thomas & James Z. Chen & David J. DeRosier & Akio Kitao & Keiichi Namba, 2004. "Structure of the bacterial flagellar hook and implication for the molecular universal joint mechanism," Nature, Nature, vol. 431(7012), pages 1062-1068, October.
    5. Tohru Minamino & Keiichi Namba, 2008. "Distinct roles of the FliI ATPase and proton motive force in bacterial flagellar protein export," Nature, Nature, vol. 451(7177), pages 485-488, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jae Kyoung Kim & Trachette L Jackson, 2013. "Mechanisms That Enhance Sustainability of p53 Pulses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, June.
    2. Junjie Luo & Jun Wang & Ting Martin Ma & Zhirong Sun, 2010. "Reverse Engineering of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway via Frequency Domain Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    3. Oliver Pohl & Marius Hintsche & Zahra Alirezaeizanjani & Maximilian Seyrich & Carsten Beta & Holger Stark, 2017. "Inferring the Chemotactic Strategy of P. putida and E. coli Using Modified Kramers-Moyal Coefficients," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Jinlong Yuan & Lei Wang & Xu Zhang & Enmin Feng & Hongchao Yin & Zhilong Xiu, 2015. "Parameter identification for a nonlinear enzyme-catalytic dynamic system with time-delays," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 791-810, August.
    5. Adel Dayarian & Madalena Chaves & Eduardo D Sontag & Anirvan M Sengupta, 2009. "Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Miri Adler & Avi Mayo & Uri Alon, 2014. "Logarithmic and Power Law Input-Output Relations in Sensory Systems with Fold-Change Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Yann S Dufour & Sébastien Gillet & Nicholas W Frankel & Douglas B Weibel & Thierry Emonet, 2016. "Direct Correlation between Motile Behavior and Protein Abundance in Single Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Payne, Joshua L., 2016. "No tradeoff between versatility and robustness in gene circuit motifs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 449(C), pages 192-199.
    9. Gregor Moenke & Martin Falcke & Keven Thurley, 2012. "Hierarchic Stochastic Modelling Applied to Intracellular Ca2+ Signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Kirstin Meyer & Nicholas C. Lammers & Lukasz J. Bugaj & Hernan G. Garcia & Orion D. Weiner, 2023. "Optogenetic control of YAP reveals a dynamic communication code for stem cell fate and proliferation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Ross D. Jones & Yili Qian & Katherine Ilia & Benjamin Wang & Michael T. Laub & Domitilla Del Vecchio & Ron Weiss, 2022. "Robust and tunable signal processing in mammalian cells via engineered covalent modification cycles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Yonatan Loewenstein, 2008. "Robustness of Learning That Is Based on Covariance-Driven Synaptic Plasticity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-10, March.
    13. Gabriele Micali & Gerardo Aquino & David M Richards & Robert G Endres, 2015. "Accurate Encoding and Decoding by Single Cells: Amplitude Versus Frequency Modulation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    14. Zeina Shreif & Vipul Periwal, 2014. "A Network Characteristic That Correlates Environmental and Genetic Robustness," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-23, February.
    15. Diana Clausznitzer & Olga Oleksiuk & Linda Løvdok & Victor Sourjik & Robert G Endres, 2010. "Chemotactic Response and Adaptation Dynamics in Escherichia coli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, May.
    16. William R Taylor & Teige R S Matthews-Palmer & Morgan Beeby, 2016. "Molecular Models for the Core Components of the Flagellar Type-III Secretion Complex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-33, November.
    17. Li, Wenyuan & Lin, Yongjing & Liu, Ying, 2007. "The structure of weighted small-world networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 376(C), pages 708-718.
    18. Robert G Endres & Joseph J Falke & Ned S Wingreen, 2007. "Chemotaxis Receptor Complexes: From Signaling to Assembly," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(7), pages 1-9, July.
    19. Guillermo Rodrigo & Santiago F Elena, 2011. "Structural Discrimination of Robustness in Transcriptional Feedforward Loops for Pattern Formation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-7, February.
    20. Chelsea Y. Hu & Richard M. Murray, 2022. "Layered feedback control overcomes performance trade-off in synthetic biomolecular networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:2006989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.