IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1000816.html

Using Entropy Maximization to Understand the Determinants of Structural Dynamics beyond Native Contact Topology

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy R Lezon
  • Ivet Bahar

Abstract

Comparison of elastic network model predictions with experimental data has provided important insights on the dominant role of the network of inter-residue contacts in defining the global dynamics of proteins. Most of these studies have focused on interpreting the mean-square fluctuations of residues, or deriving the most collective, or softest, modes of motions that are known to be insensitive to structural and energetic details. However, with increasing structural data, we are in a position to perform a more critical assessment of the structure-dynamics relations in proteins, and gain a deeper understanding of the major determinants of not only the mean-square fluctuations and lowest frequency modes, but the covariance or the cross-correlations between residue fluctuations and the shapes of higher modes. A systematic study of a large set of NMR-determined proteins is analyzed using a novel method based on entropy maximization to demonstrate that the next level of refinement in the elastic network model description of proteins ought to take into consideration properties such as contact order (or sequential separation between contacting residues) and the secondary structure types of the interacting residues, whereas the types of amino acids do not play a critical role. Most importantly, an optimal description of observed cross-correlations requires the inclusion of destabilizing, as opposed to exclusively stabilizing, interactions, stipulating the functional significance of local frustration in imparting native-like dynamics. This study provides us with a deeper understanding of the structural basis of experimentally observed behavior, and opens the way to the development of more accurate models for exploring protein dynamics.Author Summary: As more protein structures are solved, we are able to perform a more critical assessment of the relationship between protein structure and dynamics, and to gain a deeper understanding of the major determinants of structural dynamics. Here we perform a systematic study on a set of proteins structurally determined by NMR spectroscopy. The dynamics are analyzed using elastic network models and a novel method based on entropy maximization to demonstrate that properties such as contact order and secondary structure do play a role in defining the experimentally observed covariance data. Most importantly, an optimal description of observed cross-correlations requires the inclusion of destabilizing, as well as stabilizing, interactions, stipulating the functional significance of local frustration in imparting native-like dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy R Lezon & Ivet Bahar, 2010. "Using Entropy Maximization to Understand the Determinants of Structural Dynamics beyond Native Contact Topology," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000816
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000816?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elad Schneidman & Michael J. Berry & Ronen Segev & William Bialek, 2006. "Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7087), pages 1007-1012, April.
    2. Elan Z. Eisenmesser & Oscar Millet & Wladimir Labeikovsky & Dmitry M. Korzhnev & Magnus Wolf-Watz & Daryl A. Bosco & Jack J. Skalicky & Lewis E. Kay & Dorothee Kern, 2005. "Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis," Nature, Nature, vol. 438(7064), pages 117-121, November.
    3. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen & Robert B. Best & Mark A. DePristo & Christopher M. Dobson & Michele Vendruscolo, 2005. "Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics," Nature, Nature, vol. 433(7022), pages 128-132, January.
    4. Zheng Yang & Peter Májek & Ivet Bahar, 2009. "Allosteric Transitions of Supramolecular Systems Explored by Network Models: Application to Chaperonin GroEL," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(4), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Gregory D Friedland & Nils-Alexander Lakomek & Christian Griesinger & Jens Meiler & Tanja Kortemme, 2009. "A Correspondence Between Solution-State Dynamics of an Individual Protein and the Sequence and Conformational Diversity of its Family," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong Long & Rafael Brüschweiler, 2011. "In Silico Elucidation of the Recognition Dynamics of Ubiquitin," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(4), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Gregory D Friedland & Nils-Alexander Lakomek & Christian Griesinger & Jens Meiler & Tanja Kortemme, 2009. "A Correspondence Between Solution-State Dynamics of an Individual Protein and the Sequence and Conformational Diversity of its Family," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(5), pages 1-16, May.
    3. Fred Glover & Gary Kochenberger & Rick Hennig & Yu Du, 2022. "Quantum bridge analytics I: a tutorial on formulating and using QUBO models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 141-183, July.
    4. Emili Balaguer-Ballester & Christopher C Lapish & Jeremy K Seamans & Daniel Durstewitz, 2011. "Attracting Dynamics of Frontal Cortex Ensembles during Memory-Guided Decision-Making," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    5. MohammadReza Zahedian & Mahsa Bagherikalhor & Andrey Trufanov & G Reza Jafari, 2022. "Financial crisis in the framework of non-zero temperature balance theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Eddie Nijholt & Jorge Luis Ocampo-Espindola & Deniz Eroglu & István Z. Kiss & Tiago Pereira, 2022. "Emergent hypernetworks in weakly coupled oscillators," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. repec:plo:pone00:0029377 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:plo:pone00:0119978 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. repec:plo:pcbi00:1002954 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Seif Eldawlatly & Karim G Oweiss, 2011. "Millisecond-Timescale Local Network Coding in the Rat Primary Somatosensory Cortex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(6), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Thomas Bury, 2012. "Statistical pairwise interaction model of stock market," Papers 1206.4420, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2014.
    12. Lipovetsky, Stan, 2018. "Quantum paradigm of probability amplitude and complex utility in entangled discrete choice modeling," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 62-73.
    13. Xiaochuan Zhao & Germán Plata & Purushottam D Dixit, 2021. "SiGMoiD: A super-statistical generative model for binary data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(8), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Takafumi Arakaki & G Barello & Yashar Ahmadian, 2019. "Inferring neural circuit structure from datasets of heterogeneous tuning curves," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-38, April.
    15. Miguel Aguilera, 2018. "Rhythms of the Collective Brain: Metastable Synchronization and Cross-Scale Interactions in Connected Multitudes," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-9, March.
    16. Cristiano Capone & Carla Filosa & Guido Gigante & Federico Ricci-Tersenghi & Paolo Del Giudice, 2015. "Inferring Synaptic Structure in Presence of Neural Interaction Time Scales," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Mark L Ioffe & Michael J Berry II, 2017. "The structured ‘low temperature’ phase of the retinal population code," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-31, October.
    18. Ovidiu F Jurjuţ & Danko Nikolić & Wolf Singer & Shan Yu & Martha N Havenith & Raul C Mureşan, 2011. "Timescales of Multineuronal Activity Patterns Reflect Temporal Structure of Visual Stimuli," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(2), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Katarína Bod’ová & Enikő Szép & Nicholas H Barton, 2021. "Dynamic maximum entropy provides accurate approximation of structured population dynamics," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, December.
    20. MohammadReza Zahedian & Mahsa Bagherikalhor & Andrey Trufanov & G. Reza Jafari, 2022. "Financial Crisis in the Framework of Non-zero Temperature Balance Theory," Papers 2202.03198, arXiv.org.
    21. Dimitri Yatsenko & Krešimir Josić & Alexander S Ecker & Emmanouil Froudarakis & R James Cotton & Andreas S Tolias, 2015. "Improved Estimation and Interpretation of Correlations in Neural Circuits," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-28, March.
    22. Marco Mancastroppa & Iacopo Iacopini & Giovanni Petri & Alain Barrat, 2023. "Hyper-cores promote localization and efficient seeding in higher-order processes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    23. Gaëlle Desbordes & Jianzhong Jin & Chong Weng & Nicholas A Lesica & Garrett B Stanley & Jose-Manuel Alonso, 2008. "Timing Precision in Population Coding of Natural Scenes in the Early Visual System," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1000816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.