IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/0030150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chemotaxis Receptor Complexes: From Signaling to Assembly

Author

Listed:
  • Robert G Endres
  • Joseph J Falke
  • Ned S Wingreen

Abstract

Complexes of chemoreceptors in the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane allow for the sensing of ligands with remarkable sensitivity. Despite the excellent characterization of the chemotaxis signaling network, very little is known about what controls receptor complex size. Here we use in vitro signaling data to model the distribution of complex sizes. In particular, we model Tar receptors in membranes as an ensemble of different sized oligomer complexes, i.e., receptor dimers, dimers of dimers, and trimers of dimers, where the relative free energies, including receptor modification, ligand binding, and interaction with the kinase CheA determine the size distribution. Our model compares favorably with a variety of signaling data, including dose-response curves of receptor activity and the dependence of activity on receptor density in the membrane. We propose that the kinetics of complex assembly can be measured in vitro from the temporal response to a perturbation of the complex free energies, e.g., by addition of ligand.: Chemotaxis allows bacteria to sense and swim toward nutrients and away from toxins. The remarkable sensing properties of the chemotaxis network, such as high sensitivity to small changes in the chemical environment, are thought to originate from receptor complexes in the membrane, which act as antennas to magnify weak signals. To adapt to persistent stimulation, receptors are covalently modified. While the individual protein components of the chemotaxis network are well characterized, making the system well suited for quantitative and computational analysis, direct experimental visualization of receptors and receptor complexes is difficult within the current limits of fluorescence and electron microscopy. To address questions such as how large are complexes and why do they assemble, we analyze in vitro signaling data using a previously developed model of signaling by receptor complexes. Based on the data, we propose a statistical physics model for the distribution of complex sizes in the membrane. Within this model, complex size depends on the receptor free energy with contributions from receptor modification level, ligand binding, receptor–receptor coupling, and binding to accessory proteins. Our model results compare favorably with a variety of different signaling data, and suggest new experiments to measure the kinetics of assembly of receptor complexes.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert G Endres & Joseph J Falke & Ned S Wingreen, 2007. "Chemotaxis Receptor Complexes: From Signaling to Assembly," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(7), pages 1-9, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0030150
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030150
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030150&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dennis Bray & Matthew D. Levin & Carl J. Morton-Firth, 1998. "Receptor clustering as a cellular mechanism to control sensitivity," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6680), pages 85-88, May.
    2. Victor Sourjik & Howard C. Berg, 2004. "Functional interactions between receptors in bacterial chemotaxis," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6981), pages 437-441, March.
    3. U. Alon & M. G. Surette & N. Barkai & S. Leibler, 1999. "Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis," Nature, Nature, vol. 397(6715), pages 168-171, January.
    4. Dimitrios Fotiadis & Yan Liang & Slawomir Filipek & David A. Saperstein & Andreas Engel & Krzysztof Palczewski, 2003. "Rhodopsin dimers in native disc membranes," Nature, Nature, vol. 421(6919), pages 127-128, January.
    5. Kyeong Kyu Kim & Hisao Yokota & Sung-Hou Kim, 1999. "Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6746), pages 787-792, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephan Eismann & Robert G Endres, 2015. "Protein Connectivity in Chemotaxis Receptor Complexes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Diana Clausznitzer & Olga Oleksiuk & Linda Løvdok & Victor Sourjik & Robert G Endres, 2010. "Chemotactic Response and Adaptation Dynamics in Escherichia coli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Stephan Eismann & Robert G Endres, 2015. "Protein Connectivity in Chemotaxis Receptor Complexes," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Burton W Andrews & Tau-Mu Yi & Pablo A Iglesias, 2006. "Optimal Noise Filtering in the Chemotactic Response of Escherichia coli," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 2(11), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Diana Clausznitzer & Gabriele Micali & Silke Neumann & Victor Sourjik & Robert G Endres, 2014. "Predicting Chemical Environments of Bacteria from Receptor Signaling," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Jae Kyoung Kim & Trachette L Jackson, 2013. "Mechanisms That Enhance Sustainability of p53 Pulses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Christopher T Lee & Justin G Laughlin & Nils Angliviel de La Beaumelle & Rommie E Amaro & J Andrew McCammon & Ravi Ramamoorthi & Michael Holst & Padmini Rangamani, 2020. "3D mesh processing using GAMer 2 to enable reaction-diffusion simulations in realistic cellular geometries," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-35, April.
    7. Junjie Luo & Jun Wang & Ting Martin Ma & Zhirong Sun, 2010. "Reverse Engineering of Bacterial Chemotaxis Pathway via Frequency Domain Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(3), pages 1-8, March.
    8. Oliver Pohl & Marius Hintsche & Zahra Alirezaeizanjani & Maximilian Seyrich & Carsten Beta & Holger Stark, 2017. "Inferring the Chemotactic Strategy of P. putida and E. coli Using Modified Kramers-Moyal Coefficients," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Jinlong Yuan & Lei Wang & Xu Zhang & Enmin Feng & Hongchao Yin & Zhilong Xiu, 2015. "Parameter identification for a nonlinear enzyme-catalytic dynamic system with time-delays," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 791-810, August.
    10. Adel Dayarian & Madalena Chaves & Eduardo D Sontag & Anirvan M Sengupta, 2009. "Shape, Size, and Robustness: Feasible Regions in the Parameter Space of Biochemical Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Miri Adler & Avi Mayo & Uri Alon, 2014. "Logarithmic and Power Law Input-Output Relations in Sensory Systems with Fold-Change Detection," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    12. Yann S Dufour & Sébastien Gillet & Nicholas W Frankel & Douglas B Weibel & Thierry Emonet, 2016. "Direct Correlation between Motile Behavior and Protein Abundance in Single Cells," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Payne, Joshua L., 2016. "No tradeoff between versatility and robustness in gene circuit motifs," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 449(C), pages 192-199.
    14. Estera Merljak & Benjamin Malovrh & Roman Jerala, 2023. "Segmentation strategy of de novo designed four-helical bundles expands protein oligomerization modalities for cell regulation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Imke Spöring & Vincent A Martinez & Christian Hotz & Jana Schwarz-Linek & Keara L Grady & Josué M Nava-Sedeño & Teun Vissers & Hanna M Singer & Manfred Rohde & Carole Bourquin & Haralampos Hatzikirou , 2018. "Hook length of the bacterial flagellum is optimized for maximal stability of the flagellar bundle," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, September.
    16. Gregor Moenke & Martin Falcke & Keven Thurley, 2012. "Hierarchic Stochastic Modelling Applied to Intracellular Ca2+ Signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(12), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Kirstin Meyer & Nicholas C. Lammers & Lukasz J. Bugaj & Hernan G. Garcia & Orion D. Weiner, 2023. "Optogenetic control of YAP reveals a dynamic communication code for stem cell fate and proliferation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Ross D. Jones & Yili Qian & Katherine Ilia & Benjamin Wang & Michael T. Laub & Domitilla Del Vecchio & Ron Weiss, 2022. "Robust and tunable signal processing in mammalian cells via engineered covalent modification cycles," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Tristan Ursell & Kerwyn Casey Huang & Eric Peterson & Rob Phillips, 2007. "Cooperative Gating and Spatial Organization of Membrane Proteins through Elastic Interactions," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(5), pages 1-10, May.
    20. Yonatan Loewenstein, 2008. "Robustness of Learning That Is Based on Covariance-Driven Synaptic Plasticity," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(3), pages 1-10, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:0030150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.