IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pbio00/3001470.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining linguistic shifts between preprints and publications

Author

Listed:
  • David N Nicholson
  • Vincent Rubinetti
  • Dongbo Hu
  • Marvin Thielk
  • Lawrence E Hunter
  • Casey S Greene

Abstract

Preprints allow researchers to make their findings available to the scientific community before they have undergone peer review. Studies on preprints within bioRxiv have been largely focused on article metadata and how often these preprints are downloaded, cited, published, and discussed online. A missing element that has yet to be examined is the language contained within the bioRxiv preprint repository. We sought to compare and contrast linguistic features within bioRxiv preprints to published biomedical text as a whole as this is an excellent opportunity to examine how peer review changes these documents. The most prevalent features that changed appear to be associated with typesetting and mentions of supporting information sections or additional files. In addition to text comparison, we created document embeddings derived from a preprint-trained word2vec model. We found that these embeddings are able to parse out different scientific approaches and concepts, link unannotated preprint–peer-reviewed article pairs, and identify journals that publish linguistically similar papers to a given preprint. We also used these embeddings to examine factors associated with the time elapsed between the posting of a first preprint and the appearance of a peer-reviewed publication. We found that preprints with more versions posted and more textual changes took longer to publish. Lastly, we constructed a web application (https://greenelab.github.io/preprint-similarity-search/) that allows users to identify which journals and articles that are most linguistically similar to a bioRxiv or medRxiv preprint as well as observe where the preprint would be positioned within a published article landscape.Preprints allow researchers to make their findings available to the scientific community before they have undergone peer review This study analyzes the full text content of the bioRxiv preprint repository, identifying field-specific patterns and changes that occur during publication, and providing a search tool that can identify the published papers that are most similar to a given bioRxiv or medRxiv preprint.

Suggested Citation

  • David N Nicholson & Vincent Rubinetti & Dongbo Hu & Marvin Thielk & Lawrence E Hunter & Casey S Greene, 2022. "Examining linguistic shifts between preprints and publications," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-22, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001470
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001470
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.3001470&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Cobb, 2017. "The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Sarvenaz Sarabipour & Humberto J Debat & Edward Emmott & Steven J Burgess & Benjamin Schwessinger & Zach Hensel, 2019. "On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Naomi C Penfold & Jessica K Polka, 2020. "Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Michael E. Tipping & Christopher M. Bishop, 1999. "Probabilistic Principal Component Analysis," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(3), pages 611-622.
    5. repec:plo:pbio00:3000860 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicholas Fraser & Philipp Mayr & Isabella Peters, 2022. "Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: A survey of bioRxiv authors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(11), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Olivier Pourret & Dasapta Erwin Irawan & Jonathan P. Tennant, 2020. "On the Potential of Preprints in Geochemistry: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-6, April.
    3. Tom Narock & Evan B. Goldstein, 2019. "Quantifying the Growth of Preprint Services Hosted by the Center for Open Science," Publications, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Xin Xu & Yang Lu & Yupeng Zhou & Zhiguo Fu & Yanjie Fu & Minghao Yin, 2021. "An Information-Explainable Random Walk Based Unsupervised Network Representation Learning Framework on Node Classification Tasks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Matteo Barigozzi & Marc Hallin, 2023. "Dynamic Factor Models: a Genealogy," Papers 2310.17278, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    6. Chen, Andrew Y. & McCoy, Jack, 2024. "Missing values handling for machine learning portfolios," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Wang, Shao-Hsuan & Huang, Su-Yun, 2022. "Perturbation theory for cross data matrix-based PCA," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    8. Wentao Qu & Xianchao Xiu & Huangyue Chen & Lingchen Kong, 2023. "A Survey on High-Dimensional Subspace Clustering," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-39, January.
    9. Vincent Raoult, 2020. "How Many Papers Should Scientists Be Reviewing? An Analysis Using Verified Peer Review Reports," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, January.
    10. Jiaju Miao & Pawel Polak, 2023. "Online Ensemble of Models for Optimal Predictive Performance with Applications to Sector Rotation Strategy," Papers 2304.09947, arXiv.org.
    11. Jingying Yang, 2024. "Element Aggregation for Estimation of High-Dimensional Covariance Matrices," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, March.
    12. Dorota Toczydlowska & Gareth W. Peters, 2018. "Financial Big Data Solutions for State Space Panel Regression in Interest Rate Dynamics," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-45, July.
    13. Jung, WoongHee & Taflanidis, Alexandros A., 2023. "Efficient global sensitivity analysis for high-dimensional outputs combining data-driven probability models and dimensionality reduction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Matteo Barigozzi, 2023. "Asymptotic equivalence of Principal Components and Quasi Maximum Likelihood estimators in Large Approximate Factor Models," Papers 2307.09864, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    15. Arthur Pewsey & Eduardo García-Portugués, 2021. "Recent advances in directional statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 1-58, March.
    16. Johannes Burge & Priyank Jaini, 2017. "Accuracy Maximization Analysis for Sensory-Perceptual Tasks: Computational Improvements, Filter Robustness, and Coding Advantages for Scaled Additive Noise," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-32, February.
    17. Tilman M. Davies & Sudipto Banerjee & Adam P. Martin & Rose E. Turnbull, 2022. "A nearest‐neighbour Gaussian process spatial factor model for censored, multi‐depth geochemical data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(4), pages 1014-1043, August.
    18. el Bouhaddani, Said & Uh, Hae-Won & Hayward, Caroline & Jongbloed, Geurt & Houwing-Duistermaat, Jeanine, 2018. "Probabilistic partial least squares model: Identifiability, estimation and application," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 331-346.
    19. Eduardo R de Oliveira & Pedro H Bugatti & Priscila T M Saito, 2023. "Assessment of clustering techniques to support the analyses of soybean seed vigor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(8), pages 1-20, August.
    20. Nolan, Tui H. & Richardson, Sylvia & Ruffieux, Hélène, 2025. "Efficient Bayesian functional principal component analysis of irregularly-observed multivariate curves," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pbio00:3001470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosbiology (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.