IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v7y2020i1d10.1057_s41599-020-00643-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sex and gender considerations in health research: a trainee and allied research personnel perspective

Author

Listed:
  • C. Z. Kalenga

    (Cumming School of Medicine
    Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta)

  • J. Parsons Leigh

    (Dalhousie University)

  • J. Griffith

    (Women’s College Hospital
    University of Toronto)

  • D. C. Wolf

    (Université de Montréal)

  • S. M. Dumanski

    (Cumming School of Medicine
    Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
    Alberta Kidney Disease Network)

  • A. Desjarlais

    (Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta)

  • L. Petermann

    (Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta)

  • S. B. Ahmed

    (Cumming School of Medicine
    Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
    Alberta Kidney Disease Network)

Abstract

The first step in precision health is the incorporation of sex and gender-based considerations and increasingly, a number of national organizations have instituted policies to support and encourage this practice. However, perspectives of trainees and allied research personnel on incorporation of sex and gender into research is lacking. We assessed trainee (undergraduate and graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, clinical trainees) and allied research personnel (study nurses, laboratory managers) perspectives on the barriers to incorporating sex and gender into their own university-based health research and recommendations to improve the process. Two separate focus groups were completed, and a qualitative analysis was employed to derive themes within perceived barriers and solutions. Participants described three overarching themes consistent with barriers including, lack of knowledge and skill, lack of applicability and feasibility, and lack of funding agency and institutional culture. Participants recommended: (1) increasing awareness and skill of incorporation of sex and gender considerations into health research; (2) implementing practical education curricula to facilitate understanding; and (3) fostering greater transparency and accountability by funding organizations and journal editors. Sex and gender considerations in research contribute to precision health, drive innovation and foster breakthroughs in science and medicine.

Suggested Citation

  • C. Z. Kalenga & J. Parsons Leigh & J. Griffith & D. C. Wolf & S. M. Dumanski & A. Desjarlais & L. Petermann & S. B. Ahmed, 2020. "Sex and gender considerations in health research: a trainee and allied research personnel perspective," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:7:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-00643-3
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-020-00643-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-020-00643-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-020-00643-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kyle B. Murray & Gerald Hubl, 2007. "Explaining Cognitive Lock-In: The Role of Skill-Based Habits of Use in Consumer Choice," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(1), pages 77-88, March.
    2. Cara Tannenbaum & Robert P. Ellis & Friederike Eyssel & James Zou & Londa Schiebinger, 2019. "Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7781), pages 137-146, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas P. Novak & Donna L. Hoffman, 2019. "Relationship journeys in the internet of things: a new framework for understanding interactions between consumers and smart objects," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 216-237, March.
    2. Manuel Leiria & Nelson Matos & Efigénio Rebelo, 2021. "Non-life insurance cancellation: a systematic quantitative literature review," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 46(4), pages 593-613, October.
    3. Kassens-Noor, Eva & Cai, Meng & Kotval-Karamchandani, Zeenat & Decaminada, Travis, 2021. "Autonomous vehicles and mobility for people with special needs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 385-397.
    4. Nora Hesse, 2013. "Longer is not necessarily better - University Career Level and Job Creation of Academic Entrepreneurs in Germany," ERSA conference papers ersa13p960, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Lin Zhang & Beibei Sun & Fei Shu & Ying Huang, 2022. "Comparing paper level classifications across different methods and systems: an investigation of Nature publications," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7633-7651, December.
    6. Fosch-Villaronga, Eduard & Calleja, Carlos José & Drukarch, Hadassah & Torricelli, Diego, 2023. "How can ISO 13482:2014 account for the ethical and social considerations of robotic exoskeletons?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Aljukhadar, Muhammad & Senecal, Sylvain, 2016. "The user multifaceted expertise: Divergent effects of the website versus e-commerce expertise," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 322-332.
    8. Lorraine Greaves, 2020. "Missing in Action: Sex and Gender in Substance Use Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-7, March.
    9. Venera R. Khalikova & Mushan Jin & Shauhrat S. Chopra, 2021. "Gender in sustainability research: Inclusion, intersectionality, and patterns of knowledge production," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 900-912, August.
    10. Jacopo Ambrosj & Kris Dierickx & Hugh Desmond, 2024. "Codes of conduct should help scientists navigate societal expectations," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-6, December.
    11. Murray, Kyle B. & Häubl, Gerald, 2009. "Personalization without Interrogation: Towards more Effective Interactions between Consumers and Feature-Based Recommendation Agents," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 138-146.
    12. Michael O’Grady & Eleni Mangina, 2022. "Adoption of Responsible Research and Innovation in Citizen Observatories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, June.
    13. van Rijnsoever, Frank J. & Eveleens, Chris P., 2021. "Money Don't matter? How incubation experience affects start-up entrepreneurs' resource valuation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    14. Conor M. Henderson & Lena Steinhoff & Colleen M. Harmeling & Robert W. Palmatier, 2021. "Customer inertia marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 350-373, March.
    15. Kim, Kyungah & Kim, Junghun, 2024. "The study of brand loyalty and switching cost on OTT bundled service choice: Focusing on reference-dependent preferences in the saturated market," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Alexander S. Long & Brian J. Reich & Ana‐Maria Staicu & John Meitzen, 2023. "A nonparametric test of group distributional differences for hierarchically clustered functional data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3778-3791, December.
    17. Jennifer S. Labrecque & Wendy Wood & David T. Neal & Nick Harrington, 2017. "Habit slips: when consumers unintentionally resist new products," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 119-133, January.
    18. Loibl, Cäzilia & Kraybill, David S. & DeMay, Sara Wackler, 2011. "Accounting for the role of habit in regular saving," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 581-592, August.
    19. Eisend, Martin, 2014. "Shelf space elasticity: A meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 168-181.
    20. repec:osf:osfxxx:3agxf_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Li, Yongjun & Jin, Xi & Xue, Hanbing, 2025. "Avoid following individual shopping time habit to promote new products: Evidence from a randomized field experiment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:7:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-020-00643-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.