IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04797-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The broadcasting trap: TikTok and the “democratization” of digital content production

Author

Listed:
  • Federico Pilati

    (Univeristy of Bologna
    University of Milano-Bicocca
    University of Geneva)

  • Pier Luigi Sacco

    (Univeristy of Chieti-Pescara)

  • Matteo Scianna

    (Univeristy of Trento)

  • Oriol Artime

    (University of Barcelona)

Abstract

Social media and digital production tools have provided a big impulse to the possibility of a democratization of content production. However, enhanced viability does not imply an actual capacity to tap into the opportunity. Research on social media participation shows that content production, and especially the most popular content, is mostly driven by a small elite of super-users, and an additional but still small share of content creators. In this paper, we wonder whether a more recent social media such as TikTok, whose design features are optimized to facilitate content production and to enhance visibility of content from unknown users, actually makes a difference in this regard. To do so, we analyzed the production and networking patterns observed on a large database of 24,992,678 videos posted by 6,973,120 unique users on TikTok between October 2014 and December 2019. We find that in TikTok, the implicit operational logic is that of broadcasting. To spark a real democratization in digital content production, it is necessary to overcome this model and to embrace more radical forms of production and distribution, most notably intrinsically collective forms of online creation. Insofar as content production reflects a broadcasting logic, no targeted changes in the design features are likely to substantially affect the patterns of active participation in social media such as TikTok.

Suggested Citation

  • Federico Pilati & Pier Luigi Sacco & Matteo Scianna & Oriol Artime, 2025. "The broadcasting trap: TikTok and the “democratization” of digital content production," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04797-w
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04797-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04797-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04797-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brooke Erin Duffy & Megan Sawey, 2022. "In/Visibility in Social Media Work: The Hidden Labor Behind the Brands," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 77-87.
    2. Meng, Keira Shuyang & Leung, Louis, 2021. "Factors influencing TikTok engagement behaviors in China: An examination of gratifications sought, narcissism, and the Big Five personality traits," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7).
    3. Oliver Budzinski & Sophia Gaenssle, 2018. "The economics of social media (super-)stars: an empirical investigation of stardom and success on YouTube," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3-4), pages 75-95, October.
    4. Cammaerts, Bart & Mansell, Robin, 2020. "Digital platform policy and regulation: toward a radical democratic turn," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 102628, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Pier Luigi Sacco & Guido Ferilli & Giorgio Tavano Blessi, 2018. "From Culture 1.0 to Culture 3.0: Three Socio-Technical Regimes of Social and Economic Value Creation through Culture, and Their Impact on European Cohesion Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Brooke Erin Duffy & Megan Sawey, 2022. "In/Visibility in Social Media Work: The Hidden Labor Behind the Brands," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 77-87.
    7. Mikko Villi & Janne Matikainen, 2016. "Participation in Social Media: Studying Explicit and Implicit Forms of Participation in Communicative Social Networks," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 109-117.
    8. Sonia Livingstone, 2008. "Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27072, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Mikko Villi & Janne Matikainen, 2016. "Participation in Social Media: Studying Explicit and Implicit Forms of Participation in Communicative Social Networks," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 109-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salla-Maaria Laaksonen & Mikko Villi, 2022. "Editorial: New Forms of Media Work and Its Organizational and Institutional Conditions," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-4.
    2. Andrea Ballatore & Scott Rodgers & Liam McLoughlin & Susan Moore, 2024. "Facebook city: Place-named groups as urban communication infrastructure in Greater London," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(8), pages 1854-1872, October.
    3. Elisabeth Staksrud & Kjartan Ólafsson & Sonia Livingstone, 2013. "Does the use of social networking sites increase children’s risk of harm?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 45016, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Jean Mathieu Tsoumou, 2023. "“What is Wrong With You People That You are Happy Someone has Covid†Impoliteness in the Coronavirus Pandemic Era," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    5. Niina Sormanen & Epp Lauk, 2016. "Issues of Ethics and Methods in Studying Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(4), pages 63-65.
    6. repec:plo:pone00:0080682 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Chi-Hua Wu & Yu-Lin Chao & Jia-Ting Xiong & Ding-Bang Luh, 2022. "Gamification of Culture: A Strategy for Cultural Preservation and Local Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Dang, Ngoc Bich & Bertrandias, Laurent, 2023. "Social robots as healing aids: How and why powerlessness influences the intention to adopt social robots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Hsiao-Hsien Lin & Tzu-Yun Lin & Chun-Wei Hsu & Che-Hsiu Chen & Qi-Yuan Li & Po-Hsuan Wu, 2022. "Moderating Effects of Religious Tourism Activities on Environmental Risk, Leisure Satisfaction, Physical and Mental Health and Well-Being among the Elderly in the Context of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Laura Lucia-Palacios & Victoria Bordonoba-Juste & Raúl Pérez-López, 2021. "Consumer-to-consumer reselling adoption among European countries: differences between old and young millennials," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 15(2), pages 253-279, June.
    11. Gaia Daldanise & Massimo Clemente, 2022. "Port Cities Creative Heritage Enhancement (PCCHE) Scenario Approach: Culture and Creativity for Sustainable Development of Naples Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Filippo Berti Mecocci & Amir Maghssudipour & Marco Bellandi, 2022. "The effect of cultural and creative production on human capital: Evidence from European regions," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(6), pages 1263-1287, December.
    13. Montgomery, Kathryn C., 2015. "Youth and surveillance in the Facebook era: Policy interventions and social implications," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 771-786.
    14. Tamara Shepherd, 2012. "Persona rights for user-generated content: a normative framework for privacy and intellectual property regulation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59450, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Van Royen, Kathleen & Poels, Karolien & Vandebosch, Heidi, 2016. "Harmonizing freedom and protection: Adolescents' voices on automatic monitoring of social networking sites," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 35-41.
    16. Galluccio, Carla & Giambona, Francesca, 2024. "Cultural heritage and economic development: measuring sustainability over time," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Martina Bosone & Maria Casola & Gaia Daldanise & Domenico Vito, 2023. "Stimulating Circular Urban Regeneration through Cultural and Sustainable Communities: The Proposal for a Green Blue Youth Vision 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-30, July.
    18. Damianos P. Sakas & Dimitrios P. Reklitis, 2021. "The Impact of Organic Traffic of Crowdsourcing Platforms on Airlines’ Website Traffic and User Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    19. Sacco, Pier Luigi & Gallotti, Riccardo & Pilati, Federico & Castaldo, Nicola & De Domenico, Manlio, 2021. "Emergence of knowledge communities and information centralization during the COVID-19 pandemic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    20. Simon Michalke & Lisa Lohrenz & Christoph Lattemann & Susanne Robra-Bissantz, 2022. "Exploring engagement, well-being, and welfare on engagement platforms: Insight into the personal service sector from the DACH region," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2429-2444, December.
    21. Claudia Faraone, 2022. "Territorial Challenges for Cultural and Creative Industries’ Contribution to Sustainable Innovation: Evidence from the Interreg Ita-Slo Project DIVA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-34, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04797-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.