IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04781-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Religiosity and beliefs in medical conspiracy theories in 37 European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Jabkowski

    (Adam Mickiewicz University)

  • Jan Domaradzki

    (Poznan University of Medical Sciences)

  • Mariusz Baranowski

    (Adam Mickiewicz University)

Abstract

While beliefs in conspiracy theories related to medical procedures proliferated in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic, previous research has focussed on such predictors of conspiracy as age, gender, educational status, political orientation, and trust in science. By analysing the data from the Eurobarometer survey conducted in 2021 in 37 European countries, this study describes the association between beliefs in medical conspiracy theories and religiosity. It reports three significant findings: first, medical conspiracy theories are more prevalent in the Baltic, Balkan, Southern, Central, and Eastern European countries; second, people who declare themselves to be religious are more willing to believe in medical conspiracy theories; and third, Muslims, Catholics, and Orthodox Christians demonstrated stronger support for medical conspiracy theories than other faith groups and non-believers. Analysing data at both the individual and country level sheds light on the role of religion as a predictor of a conspiracy belief, which may influence people’s medical and health behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Jabkowski & Jan Domaradzki & Mariusz Baranowski, 2025. "Religiosity and beliefs in medical conspiracy theories in 37 European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04781-4
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04781-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04781-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04781-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shadi Shahsavari & Pavan Holur & Tianyi Wang & Timothy R. Tangherlini & Vwani Roychowdhury, 2020. "Conspiracy in the time of corona: automatic detection of emerging COVID-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 279-317, November.
    2. Carstairs, C., 2015. "Debating water fluoridation before Dr. Strangelove," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(8), pages 1559-1569.
    3. Alexander Yendell & David Herbert, 2022. "Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 229-242.
    4. repec:plo:pone00:0089177 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Małgorzata Sobol & Marcin Zajenkowski & Konrad S. Jankowski, 2022. "Religious Fundamentalism, Delusions, and Conspiracy Beliefs Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-6, August.
    6. Roland Imhoff & Felix Zimmer & Olivier Klein & João H. C. António & Maria Babinska & Adrian Bangerter & Michal Bilewicz & Nebojša Blanuša & Kosta Bovan & Rumena Bužarovska & Aleksandra Cichocka & Sylv, 2022. "Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(3), pages 392-403, March.
    7. Alexander Yendell & David Herbert, 2022. "Religion, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Rejection of Democracy: Evidence From the UK," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 229-242.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Khokhlova & Nishtha Lamba & Aditi Bhatia & Marina Vinogradova, 2021. "Biowarfare conspiracy, faith in government, and compliance with safety guidelines during COVID-19: an international study," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 20(2), pages 235-251, November.
    2. Laura Colautti & Alice Cancer & Sara Magenes & Alessandro Antonietti & Paola Iannello, 2022. "Risk-Perception Change Associated with COVID-19 Vaccine’s Side Effects: The Role of Individual Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Sara Monaci & Domenico Morreale & Simone Persico, 2023. "The Eurabia Conspiracy Theory: Twitter’s Political Influencers, Narratives, and Information Sources," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 73-85.
    4. Endtricht, Rebecca & Kanol, Eylem, 2024. "Conspiracy beliefs and negative attitudes towards outgroups in times of crises: Experimental evidence from Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(11), pages 1-20.
    5. Man Hung & Amir Mohajeri & Jody Chiang & Jungweon Park & Beatrice Bautista & Chase Hardy & Martin S. Lipsky, 2023. "Community Water Fluoridation in Focus: A Comprehensive Look at Fluoridation Levels across America," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(23), pages 1-11, November.
    6. Patrick Cheong-Iao Pang & Wenjing Jiang & Guanwen Pu & Kin-Sun Chan & Ying Lau, 2022. "Social Media Engagement in Two Governmental Schemes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Macao," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Roşu, Maria-Magdalena & Fiscutean, Andrada & Paun, Mihaela, 2024. "The press and government, influencers of citizens’ political opinions: A quasi-experiment on Brexit," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 272-288.
    8. J. D. Moffitt & Catherine King & Kathleen M. Carley, 2024. "Connecting the domains: an investigation of internet domains found in Covid-19 conspiracy tweets," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 206-231, September.
    9. Anne Küppers, 2024. "Anything but Representative Democracy: Explaining Conspiracy Believers’ Support for Direct Democracy and Technocracy," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    10. Shelley Boulianne & Sangwon Lee, 2022. "Conspiracy Beliefs, Misinformation, Social Media Platforms, and Protest Participation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 30-41.
    11. Agnieszka Turska-Kawa & Irena Pilch, 2022. "Political beliefs and the acceptance of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic restrictions. The case of Poland," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Emilio Ferrara & Stefano Cresci & Luca Luceri, 2020. "Misinformation, manipulation, and abuse on social media in the era of COVID-19," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 271-277, November.
    13. Janeth Marwa & Mesia Lufingo & Chicgoua Noubactep & Revocatus Machunda, 2018. "Defeating Fluorosis in the East African Rift Valley: Transforming the Kilimanjaro into a Rainwater Harvesting Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    14. Serhan Cevik, 2024. "How Mumbo-Jumbo conquered the world: empirical analysis of conspiracy theories," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1-13, August.
    15. Huo, Liang’an & Yu, Yue, 2023. "The impact of the self-recognition ability and physical quality on coupled negative information-behavior-epidemic dynamics in multiplex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Youngha Song & Junhewk Kim, 2021. "Community Water Fluoridation: Caveats to Implement Justice in Public Oral Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-10, March.
    17. Yachao Li & Sylvia Twersky & Kelsey Ignace & Mei Zhao & Radhika Purandare & Breeda Bennett-Jones & Scott R. Weaver, 2020. "Constructing and Communicating COVID-19 Stigma on Twitter: A Content Analysis of Tweets during the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-12, September.
    18. Kinga Bierwiaczonek & Sam Fluit & Tilmann Soest & Matthew J. Hornsey & Jonas R. Kunst, 2024. "Loneliness trajectories over three decades are associated with conspiracist worldviews in midlife," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-8, December.
    19. Kevin Winter & Matthew J. Hornsey & Lotte Pummerer & Kai Sassenberg, 2022. "Anticipating and defusing the role of conspiracy beliefs in shaping opposition to wind farms," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(12), pages 1200-1207, December.
    20. Shelley Boulianne & Sangwon Lee, 2022. "Conspiracy Beliefs, Misinformation, Social Media Platforms, and Protest Participation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(4), pages 30-41.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04781-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.