IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-025-04459-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cybercrime through the public lens: a longitudinal analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Krishnashree Achuthan

    (Amritapuri)

  • Sugandh Khobragade

    (Amritapuri)

  • Robin Kowalski

    (Clemson University)

Abstract

In the digital age, cybercrime has emerged as a formidable challenge with complex human and socio-economic ramifications. This study delves into the multifaceted impacts of cybercrime by analyzing public sentiments and societal reactions as reflected in online discourses, specifically within the realm of Reddit. Through a detailed extraction process focused on cybercrime-related keywords, our analysis delved into over 6700 posts and 100,000+ comments, uncovering prevalent themes and emotions in the discourse across five significant subreddits related to technology and global news from 2008 to 2022. By filtering for posts with primarily negative sentiments, we gained insights into the dominant emotional currents shaping these discussions. Our methodological framework integrated sentiment analysis, BERTopic modeling, and emotion classification using the advanced Gemini LLM. The thematic exploration revealed critical areas of public concern and discourse patterns, shedding light on prevalent topics such as data breaches, cyber-attacks, ransomware attacks, Chinese hacking, and the Iran-Israel conflict, amongst others, that captivate and provoke the online community. Furthermore, our investigation into the emotional landscape of these discussions uncovers a significant prevalence of anger, fear, sarcasm, and other emotions offering profound insights into the psychological and emotional responses elicited by cybercriminal activities. The correlation between the sentiments expressed in original posts and the emotional tones of subsequent comments provides a better understanding of the community’s stance and the collective emotional experience through the discourse. The implications of our findings are far-reaching, extending beyond academic interest to inform policymakers, media professionals, and various stakeholders involved in the realm of digital security. By decoding the public’s reaction to cybercrime through the lens of online discussions, this study contributes to a deeper comprehension of the societal impacts of digital threats.

Suggested Citation

  • Krishnashree Achuthan & Sugandh Khobragade & Robin Kowalski, 2025. "Cybercrime through the public lens: a longitudinal analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04459-x
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04459-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-025-04459-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-025-04459-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. An, Lu & Zhou, Wenjing & Ou, Menghua & Li, Gang & Yu, Chuanming & Wang, Xiaofen, 2021. "Measuring and profiling the topical influence and sentiment contagion of public event stakeholders," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Stuart Capstick & Lorraine Whitmarsh & Wouter Poortinga & Nick Pidgeon & Paul Upham, 2015. "International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 35-61, January.
    3. Giuseppe Varavallo & Giulia Scarpetti & Filippo Barbera, 2023. "The moral economy of the great resignation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Peng Wang & Mei Su & Jingyi Wang, 2021. "Organized crime in cyberspace: How traditional organized criminal groups exploit the online peer-to-peer lending market in China," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 61(2), pages 303-324.
    5. Eric Jardine & Nathaniel Porter & Ryan Shandler, 2024. "Cyberattacks and public opinion – The effect of uncertainty in guiding preferences," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 103-118, January.
    6. Valerio Basile & Francesco Cauteruccio & Giorgio Terracina, 2021. "How Dramatic Events Can Affect Emotionality in Social Posting: The Impact of COVID-19 on Reddit," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-32, January.
    7. Jessica H. Phoenix & Lucy G. Atkinson & Hannah Baker, 2019. "Creating and communicating social research for policymakers in government," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11, December.
    8. Shuai Chen & Mengmeng Hao & Fangyu Ding & Dong Jiang & Jiping Dong & Shize Zhang & Qiquan Guo & Chundong Gao, 2023. "Exploring the global geography of cybercrime and its driving forces," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Jun Fan & Lijuan Peng & Tinggui Chen & Guodong Cong, 2024. "Mining the impact of social media information on public green consumption attitudes: a framework based on ELM and text data mining," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Christos Makridis & Lennart Maschmeyer & Max Smeets, 2024. "If it bleeps it leads? Media coverage on cyber conflict and misperception," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 72-86, January.
    11. Lies De Kimpe & Michel Walrave & Pieter Verdegem & Koen Ponnet, 2022. "What we think we know about cybersecurity: an investigation of the relationship between perceived knowledge, internet trust, and protection motivation in a cybercrime context," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 1796-1808, June.
    12. Stuart Capstick & Lorraine Whitmarsh & Wouter Poortinga & Nick Pidgeon & Paul Upham, 2015. "International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(4), pages 435-435, July.
    13. Karen Renaud & Verena Zimmermann & Tim Schürmann & Carlos Böhm, 2021. "Exploring cybersecurity-related emotions and finding that they are challenging to measure," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.
    14. Shandler, Ryan & Gross, Michael L. & Backhaus, Sophia & Canetti, Daphna, 2022. "Cyber Terrorism and Public Support for Retaliation – A Multi-Country Survey Experiment," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 850-868, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iwowari Beatrice Dute, 2020. "The Influence of Cross-Cultural Language and Background on Climate Change Perception – An Empirical Investigation," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(9), pages 50-55, September.
    2. Jacob Dice & Mallick Hossain & David Rodziewicz, 2024. "Flood Risk Exposures and Mortgage-Backed Security Asset Performance and Risk Sharing," Research Working Paper RWP 24-05, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    3. Sam Crawley & Hilde Coffé & Ralph Chapman, 2022. "Climate Belief and Issue Salience: Comparing Two Dimensions of Public Opinion on Climate Change in the EU," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 307-325, July.
    4. Byungdoo Kim & David L. Kay & Jonathon P. Schuldt, 2021. "Will I have to move because of climate change? Perceived likelihood of weather- or climate-related relocation among the US public," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-8, March.
    5. D. Liliana González-Hernández & Raúl A. Aguirre-Gamboa & Erik W. Meijles, 2023. "The role of climate change perceptions and sociodemographics on reported mitigation efforts and performance among households in northeastern Mexico," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 1853-1875, February.
    6. Amit Kumar & T. Mohanasundari, 2025. "Perceptions of climate change and it’s impacts on tribal livelihoods: an empirical study from central India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(9), pages 10125-10148, May.
    7. Amelia C Arsenault & Sarah E Kreps & Keren LG Snider & Daphna Canetti, 2024. "Cyber scares and prophylactic policies: Crossnational evidence on the effect of cyberattacks on public support for surveillance," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(3), pages 413-428, May.
    8. Umar, Shayan & Waqas, Adeel & Tanveer, Waqas & Shahzad, Nadia & Janjua, Abdul Kashif & Dehghan, Maziar & Qureshi, Muhammad Salik & Shakir, Sehar, 2023. "A building integrated solar PV surface-cleaning setup to optimize the electricity output of PV modules in a polluted atmosphere," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Lasarov, Wassili & Hoffmann, Stefan & Mai, Robert & Schleich, Joachim, 2024. "Carbon footprint tracking apps: The spillover effects of feedback and goal-activating appeals," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    11. Andrew G. Meyer, 2022. "Do economic conditions affect climate change beliefs and support for climate action? Evidence from the US in the wake of the Great Recession," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(1), pages 64-86, January.
    12. Kevin Grecksch & Carola Klöck, 0. "Access and allocation in climate change adaptation," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    13. Hein, Walter & Wilson, Clevo & Lee, Boon & Rajapaksa, Darshana & de Moel, Hans & Athukorala, Wasantha & Managi, Shunsuke, 2019. "Climate change and natural disasters: Government mitigation activities and public property demand response," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 436-443.
    14. Cafferata, Alessia & Dávila-Fernández, Marwil J. & Sordi, Serena, 2021. "Seeing what can(not) be seen: Confirmation bias, employment dynamics and climate change," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 567-586.
    15. Yu Luo & Brynley Hanson-Wright & Hadi Dowlatabadi & Jiaying Zhao, 2025. "How does personalized feedback on carbon emissions impact intended climate action?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 3593-3607, February.
    16. Qiaoyu Luo, 2024. "Cybercrime as an industry: examining the organisational structure of Chinese cybercrime," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández & Serena Sordi & Alessia Cafferata, 2024. "How do you feel about going green? Modelling environmental sentiments in a growing open economy," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 19(4), pages 649-687, October.
    18. Cha, Min-kyeong & Struthers, Cory L. & Brown, Marilyn A. & Kale, Snehal & Chapman, Oliver, 2024. "Toward residential decarbonization: Analyzing social-psychological drivers of household co-adoption of rooftop solar, electric vehicles, and efficient HVAC systems in Georgia, U.S," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    19. Jagadish Thaker & Nicholas Smith & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2020. "Global Warming Risk Perceptions in India," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(12), pages 2481-2497, December.
    20. Allison Ford & Kari Marie Norgaard, 2020. "Whose everyday climate cultures? Environmental subjectivities and invisibility in climate change discourse," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 43-62, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04459-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.