IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v58y2007i7d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multiobjective optimization model for processing and distributing biosolids to reuse fields

Author

Listed:
  • S A Gabriel

    (University of Maryland, College Park)

  • P Sahakij

    (University of Maryland, College Park)

  • M Ramirez

    (District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority)

  • C Peot

    (District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority)

Abstract

Advanced wastewater treatment plants remove deleterious nutrients, chemicals, and microorganisms from wastewater and produce biosolids products to be reused at farms and other sites. These biosolids are carefully regulated by environmental restrictions but still may be malodorous to the local populations. In this paper, we develop a multiobjective optimization model to simultaneously minimize the biosolids odours as well as processing and distribution costs. The model employs a linear odour function and bilinear costs; the latter being approximated via Schur's decomposition and special ordered set (SOS) type 2 variables resulting in a mixed integer linear multiobjective optimization problem. Such a model can be used proactively by these plants to produce the least malodorous product at minimal costs. We demonstrate use of the model with a case study for the Blue Plains advanced wastewater treatment plant run by the DC Water and Sewer Authority in Washington, DC.

Suggested Citation

  • S A Gabriel & P Sahakij & M Ramirez & C Peot, 2007. "A multiobjective optimization model for processing and distributing biosolids to reuse fields," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(7), pages 850-864, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:58:y:2007:i:7:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602201
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602201
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Ni-Bin & Wang, S.F., 1997. "A fuzzy goal programming approach for the optimal planning of metropolitan solid waste management systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 303-321, June.
    2. S A Gabriel & R García-Bertrand & P Sahakij & A J Conejo, 2006. "A practical approach to approximate bilinear functions in mathematical programming problems by using Schur's decomposition and SOS type 2 variables," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(8), pages 995-1004, August.
    3. Escudero, Laureano F., 1978. "A comparative analysis of linear fitting for non-linear functions on optimization : A case study: Air pollution problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 398-408, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prawat Sahakij & Steven Gabriel & Mark Ramirez & Chris Peot, 2011. "Multi-objective Optimization Models for Distributing Biosolids to Reuse Fields: A Case Study for the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, March.
    2. G Mitchell & J E Beasley, 2011. "Optimisation of sludge treatment and transport," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(6), pages 939-948, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prawat Sahakij & Steven Gabriel & Mark Ramirez & Chris Peot, 2011. "Multi-objective Optimization Models for Distributing Biosolids to Reuse Fields: A Case Study for the Blue Plains Wastewater Treatment Plant," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Aouni, Belaid & Kettani, Ossama, 2001. "Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promising future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 225-231, January.
    3. Zhou, Feng & Huang, Gordon H. & Chen, Guo-Xian & Guo, Huai-Cheng, 2009. "Enhanced-interval linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 323-333, December.
    4. Xu, Y. & Huang, G.H. & Qin, X.S. & Cao, M.F., 2009. "SRCCP: A stochastic robust chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 352-363.
    5. Chen, C. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H., 2016. "Interval-fuzzy municipal-scale energy model for identification of optimal strategies for energy management – A case study of Tianjin, China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1161-1177.
    6. Senay Oguztimur, 2011. "Why Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach For Transport Problems?," ERSA conference papers ersa11p438, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Ran, Cuiling & Zhang, Yanzi & Yin, Ying, 2021. "Demand response to improve the shared electric vehicle planning: Managerial insights, sustainable benefits," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    8. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Wang, G.Q. & Huang, Y.F., 2009. "FSWM: A hybrid fuzzy-stochastic water-management model for agricultural sustainability under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(12), pages 1807-1818, December.
    9. Di Corato, Luca & Montinari, Natalia, 2014. "Flexible waste management under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 174-185.
    10. Hammad, Ahmed W A & Akbarnezhad, Ali & Rey, David, 2017. "Sustainable urban facility location: Minimising noise pollution and network congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 38-59.
    11. Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Yang, Z.F. & Nie, S.L., 2008. "IFMP: Interval-fuzzy multistage programming for water resources management under uncertainty," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 800-812.
    12. E Bustamante-Cedeño & S Arora, 2008. "Stochastic and minimum regret formulations for transmission network expansion planning under uncertainties," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(11), pages 1547-1556, November.
    13. Chen, Chang-Chih & Shyu, So-De & Wu, Yen-Chun & Yang, Chih-Yuan, 2011. "A waste management model for optimal recycling-landfilling policies under macroeconomic conditions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 852-858, May.
    14. Changgang Ma & Min Zhou, 2018. "A GIS-Based Interval Fuzzy Linear Programming for Optimal Land Resource Allocation at a City Scale," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 143-166, January.
    15. Jing Liang & Ming Liu, 2018. "Network Design for Municipal Solid Waste Collection: A Case Study of the Nanjing Jiangbei New Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Şeyda Gür & Tamer Eren, 2018. "Scheduling and Planning in Service Systems with Goal Programming: Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-16, November.
    17. S. Siddiqui & S. Gabriel, 2013. "An SOS1-Based Approach for Solving MPECs with a Natural Gas Market Application," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 205-227, June.
    18. Zihao Jiao & Lun Ran & Xin Liu & Yuli Zhang & Robin G. Qiu, 2020. "Integrating Price-Incentive and Trip-Selection Policies to Rebalance Shared Electric Vehicles," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 148-173, December.
    19. Eiselt, H.A., 2007. "Locating landfills--Optimization vs. reality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 1040-1049, June.
    20. Min Zhou & Shasha Lu & Shukui Tan & Danping Yan & Guoliang Ou & Dianfeng Liu & Xiang Luo & Yanan Li & Lu Zhang & Zuo Zhang & Xiangbo Zhu, 2017. "A stochastic equilibrium chance-constrained programming model for municipal solid waste management of the City of Dalian, China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 199-218, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:58:y:2007:i:7:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2602201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.