IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/jorsoc/v53y2002i3d10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of coherent supply chain strategy and performance management in achieving competitive advantage: an international survey

Author

Listed:
  • A Harrison

    (Cranfield University)

  • C New

    (Cranfield University)

Abstract

The results of a major international survey into the relationship between corporate strategy, supply chain strategy and supply chain performance management are reported. Five clearly defined groups are identified: Supply Chain Leaders, Strong and Weak Players, Lagging Players and Non-players. Those business units that report a close link between their supply chain strategy and their supply chain technology, in comparison with those that report a weaker link, displayed a consistent set of characteristics. They rate supply chain strategy as more important for corporate strategy. They have a relatively sophisticated definition of their supply chain strategy. They think their supply chain is more important in achieving competitive advantage, they have invested more in supply chain infrastructure and IT support and they have more formal means of assessing their supply chain performance. There is evidence of inconsistency in the way many businesses relate their supply chain, corporate, and investment strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • A Harrison & C New, 2002. "The role of coherent supply chain strategy and performance management in achieving competitive advantage: an international survey," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(3), pages 263-271, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:53:y:2002:i:3:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601193
    DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601193
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601193
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601193?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ilkka Sillanpää & Sebastian Sillanpää, 2014. "Supply Chain Strategy: Empirical Case Study in Europe and Asia," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 9(2), pages 95-115.
    2. Elgazzar, Sara H. & Tipi, Nicoleta S. & Hubbard, Nick J. & Leach, David Z., 2012. "Linking supply chain processes’ performance to a company’s financial strategic objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 276-289.
    3. Jianxiong Zhang & Lin Feng & Wansheng Tang, 2014. "Optimal Contract Design of Supplier-Led Outsourcing Based on Pontryagin Maximum Principle," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 592-607, May.
    4. Jafarian, Ahmad & Rabiee, Meysam & Tavana, Madjid, 2020. "A novel multi-objective co-evolutionary approach for supply chain gap analysis with consideration of uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Mojtaba Azizian & Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri & Mohammad Ali Rastegar, 2022. "A Convex Dynamic Approach for Globally Optimal Profit in Supply Chains," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, February.
    6. Zhou, Honggeng & Shou, Yongyi & Zhai, Xin & Li, Ling & Wood, Craig & Wu, Xiaobo, 2014. "Supply chain practice and information quality: A supply chain strategy study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PC), pages 624-633.
    7. J P C Kleijnen & M T Smits, 2003. "Performance metrics in supply chain management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(5), pages 507-514, May.
    8. Perez-Franco, R. & Phadnis, S. & Caplice, C. & Sheffi, Y., 2016. "Rethinking supply chain strategy as a conceptual system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 384-396.
    9. Kleijnen, J.P.C. & Smits, M.T., 2003. "Performance metrics in supply chain management," Other publications TiSEM 80777aed-0c9f-4ded-b0bb-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Li, Xiang, 2017. "A fair evaluation of certain stage in a two-stage structure: revisiting the typical two-stage DEA approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 155-167.
    11. Liliana Avelar-Sosa & Jorge L. García-Alcaraz & José M. Mejía-Muñoz & Aidé A. Maldonado-Macías & Giner Alor Hernández, 2018. "Government Support and Market Proximity: Exploring Their Relationship with Supply Chain Agility and Financial performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Tobias Stangl & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2017. "Equivalent Inventory Metrics: A Behavioral Perspective," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 472-488, July.
    13. Schnetzler, Matthias J. & Sennheiser, Andreas & Schonsleben, Paul, 2007. "A decomposition-based approach for the development of a supply chain strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 21-42, January.
    14. Saromi Newton & Sahayaselvi Susainathan & Hesil Jerda George & Majdi Quttainah & Satyanarayana Parayitam, 2024. "Top Management Commitment as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Green Banking Adoption Practices and Performance: Evidence from India," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 17(1), pages 33-62, June.
    15. Yuyan Wang & Zhaoqing Yu & Liang Shen & Yan Ge & Jing Li, 2018. "Different Dominant Models and Fairness Concern of E-Supply Chain," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:jorsoc:v:53:y:2002:i:3:d:10.1057_palgrave.jors.2601193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.