IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v26y2004i4p564-578.html

Undergraduate Agribusiness Programs: Focus or Falter?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael A. Boland
  • Jay T. Akridge

Abstract

Agribusiness has become an important part of undergraduate agricultural economics programs. Will these programs continue to serve the needs of both industry and students in the future? To survive and thrive, agribusiness programs must pursue an aggressive niche strategy. Programs must be more than collections of courses, they must be coordinated, integrated experiences that foster critical thinking and communications skills, develop industry-specific knowledge, and cultivate diversity of thought. The agricultural economics heritage of most programs can be used as a point of difference. Programs must pursue partnerships with industry and other academic programs. Faculty development must be a priority. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael A. Boland & Jay T. Akridge, 2004. "Undergraduate Agribusiness Programs: Focus or Falter? ," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(4), pages 564-578.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:26:y:2004:i:4:p:564-578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00200.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Smith Porter, Shannon & Phillips, Jon C., 2014. "Master’s Programs in Agricultural Economics: Situation and Analysis," Research Reports 187829, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, Center for Food Marketing and Agribusiness Solutions.
    2. Joey E. Mehlhorn & Laurie Bonney & Niyan Fraser & Morgan P. Miles, 2015. "Benchmarking Entrepreneurship Education In U.S., Australian, And New Zealand University Agriculture Programs," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Noel, Jay & Qenani, Eivis, . "New Age, New Learners, New Skills: What Skills Do Agribusiness Graduates Need to Succeed in the Knowledge Economy?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20.
    4. Hideo Aizaki & Yasuhiro Nakashima & Kiyokazu Ujiie & Hironobu Takeshita & Kengo Tahara, 2011. "Intention to access food risk information through Internet-enabled mobile phones: the role of critical thinking," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(11), pages 1005-1009.
    5. Connor, Larry J., 2005. "Design and Management of Teaching Programs With Survival In Mind," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 37(2), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Dunne, AJ, 2010. "Contemporary Issues in the Provision of Tertiary Agriculture Programs: A Case Study of The University of Queensland," Papers 234281, University of Melbourne, Melbourne School of Land and Environment.
    7. Detre, Joshua D. & Gunderson, Michael A. & Oliver Peake, Whitney & Dooley, Frank J., . "Academic Perspectives on Agribusiness: An International Survey," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(5), pages 1-25.
    8. Norbert L.W. Wilson & Robert G. Nelson, 2009. "A Laboratory Science Approach to Teaching in the Agricultural Economics Curriculum," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 331-343.
    9. Larson, Ronald B., 2013. "Addressing the Needs of the Agribusiness “Fringe”," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150805, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:26:y:2004:i:4:p:564-578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Oxford University Press to update the entry or send us the correct address or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.