IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v84y2017i2p964-968..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corrigendum: Instrumental Variables with Unrestricted Heterogeneity and Continuous Treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Stefan Hoderlein
  • Hajo Holzmann
  • Maximilian Kasy
  • Alexander Meister

Abstract

This article discusses identification in continuous triangular systems without restrictions on heterogeneity or functional form. We do not assume separability of structural functions, restrictions on the dimensionality of unobservables, or monotonicity in unobservables. We do maintain monotonicity of the first stage relationship in the instrument and consider the case of real-valued treatment. Under these conditions alone, and given rich enough support of the data, potential outcome distributions, the average structural function, and quantile structural functions are point identified. If the support of the continuous instrument is not large enough, potential outcome distributions are partially identified. If the instrument is discrete, identification fails completely. If treatment is multi-dimensional, additional exclusion restrictions yield identification. The set-up discussed in this article covers important cases not covered by existing approaches such as conditional moment restrictions (cf. Newey and Powell, 2003) and control variables (cf. Imbens and Newey, 2009). It covers, in particular, random coefficient models, as well as systems of structural equations.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Stefan Hoderlein & Hajo Holzmann & Maximilian Kasy & Alexander Meister, 2017. "Corrigendum: Instrumental Variables with Unrestricted Heterogeneity and Continuous Treatment," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 84(2), pages 964-968.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:84:y:2017:i:2:p:964-968.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/restud/rdw027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guido W. Imbens & Whitney K. Newey, 2009. "Identification and Estimation of Triangular Simultaneous Equations Models Without Additivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(5), pages 1481-1512, September.
    2. Stefan Hoderlein & Hajo Holzmann & Maximilian Kasy & Alexander Meister, 2017. "Corrigendum: Instrumental Variables with Unrestricted Heterogeneity and Continuous Treatment," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 84(2), pages 964-968.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gunsilius, Florian F., 2023. "A condition for the identification of multivariate models with binary instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 220-238.
    2. Young Jun Lee & Daniel Wilhelm, 2020. "Testing for the presence of measurement error in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(2), pages 382-404, June.
    3. Hoderlein, Stefan & Holzmann, Hajo & Meister, Alexander, 2017. "The triangular model with random coefficients," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 144-169.
    4. Nir Billfeld & Moshe Kim, 2024. "Context-dependent Causality (the Non-Nonotonic Case)," Papers 2404.05021, arXiv.org.
    5. Florian F Gunsilius, 2025. "A primer on optimal transport for causal inference with observational data," Papers 2503.07811, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    6. Markus Frölich & Martin Huber, 2017. "Direct and indirect treatment effects–causal chains and mediation analysis with instrumental variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1645-1666, November.
    7. Chen, Songnian & Wang, Xi, 2018. "Semiparametric estimation of panel data models without monotonicity or separability," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 515-530.
    8. Diana Alessandrini & Bharat Diwakar, 2023. "The Intergenerational Effects of Recessions," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 69(4), pages 1060-1087, December.
    9. Chetverikov, Denis & Wilhelm, Daniel & Kim, Dongwoo, 2021. "An Adaptive Test Of Stochastic Monotonicity," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(3), pages 495-536, June.
    10. Grenet, Julien & Grönqvist, Hans & Niknami, Susan, 2025. "The effects of electronic monitoring on offenders and their families," Working Paper Series 2025:12, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    11. Demuynck, T., 2015. "The homogeneous marginal utility of income assumption," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    12. Daniel Wilhelm, 2018. "Testing for the presence of measurement error," CeMMAP working papers CWP45/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    13. Stefan Hoderlein & Hajo Holzmann & Maximilian Kasy & Alexander Meister, 2015. "Erratum regarding “Instrumental variables with unrestricted heterogeneity and continuous treatment”," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 896, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 01 Feb 2016.
    14. Huntington-Klein Nick, 2020. "Instruments with Heterogeneous Effects: Bias, Monotonicity, and Localness," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 182-208, January.
    15. Carolina Caetano & Juan Carlos Escaniano, 2015. "Identifying Multiple Marginal Effects with a Single Binary Instrument or by Regression Discontinuity," CAEPR Working Papers 2015-009, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    16. Florian Gunsilius, 2018. "Point-identification in multivariate nonseparable triangular models," Papers 1806.09680, arXiv.org.
    17. Brendan Kline, 2016. "Identification of the Direction of a Causal Effect by Instrumental Variables," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 176-184, April.
    18. Songnian Chen & Shakeeb Khan & Xun Tang, 2022. "Endogeneity in Weakly Separable Models without Monotonicity," Papers 2208.05047, arXiv.org.
    19. Stefan Hoderlein & Hajo Holzmann & Maximilian Kasy & Alexander Meister, 2017. "Corrigendum: Instrumental Variables with Unrestricted Heterogeneity and Continuous Treatment," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 84(2), pages 964-968.
    20. Huntington-Klein Nick, 2020. "Instruments with Heterogeneous Effects: Bias, Monotonicity, and Localness," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 182-208, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nir Billfeld & Moshe Kim, 2024. "Context-dependent Causality (the Non-Nonotonic Case)," Papers 2404.05021, arXiv.org.
    2. Markus Frölich & Martin Huber, 2017. "Direct and indirect treatment effects–causal chains and mediation analysis with instrumental variables," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(5), pages 1645-1666, November.
    3. Daniel Wilhelm, 2018. "Testing for the presence of measurement error," CeMMAP working papers CWP45/18, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    4. Stefan Hoderlein & Hajo Holzmann & Maximilian Kasy & Alexander Meister, 2015. "Erratum regarding “Instrumental variables with unrestricted heterogeneity and continuous treatment”," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 896, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 01 Feb 2016.
    5. Florian Gunsilius, 2018. "Point-identification in multivariate nonseparable triangular models," Papers 1806.09680, arXiv.org.
    6. Florian F Gunsilius, 2025. "A primer on optimal transport for causal inference with observational data," Papers 2503.07811, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    7. Hoderlein, Stefan & Holzmann, Hajo & Meister, Alexander, 2017. "The triangular model with random coefficients," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 144-169.
    8. Demuynck, T., 2015. "The homogeneous marginal utility of income assumption," Research Memorandum 013, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    9. Songnian Chen & Shakeeb Khan & Xun Tang, 2022. "Endogeneity in Weakly Separable Models without Monotonicity," Papers 2208.05047, arXiv.org.
    10. Grenet, Julien & Grönqvist, Hans & Niknami, Susan, 2025. "The effects of electronic monitoring on offenders and their families," Working Paper Series 2025:12, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    11. Gunsilius, Florian F., 2023. "A condition for the identification of multivariate models with binary instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 220-238.
    12. Ma, Lingjie & Koenker, Roger, 2006. "Quantile regression methods for recursive structural equation models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 471-506, October.
    13. Kato, Kengo & F. Galvao, Antonio & Montes-Rojas, Gabriel V., 2012. "Asymptotics for panel quantile regression models with individual effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 76-91.
    14. Hoderlein, Stefan & White, Halbert, 2012. "Nonparametric identification in nonseparable panel data models with generalized fixed effects," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 168(2), pages 300-314.
    15. Arellano, Manuel & Blundell, Richard & Bonhomme, Stéphane & Light, Jack, 2024. "Heterogeneity of consumption responses to income shocks in the presence of nonlinear persistence," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(2).
    16. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández‐Val & Blaise Melly, 2013. "Inference on Counterfactual Distributions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(6), pages 2205-2268, November.
    17. Bodory, Hugo & Huber, Martin, 2018. "The causalweight package for causal inference in R," FSES Working Papers 493, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Freiburg/Fribourg Switzerland.
    18. Juan Carlos Escanciano & Telmo P'erez-Izquierdo, 2023. "Automatic Debiased Estimation with Machine Learning-Generated Regressors," Papers 2301.10643, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    19. Victor Chernozhukov & Iván Fernández-Val & Blaise Melly & Kaspar Wüthrich, 2020. "Generic Inference on Quantile and Quantile Effect Functions for Discrete Outcomes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(529), pages 123-137, January.
    20. Hoderlein, Stefan & Su, Liangjun & White, Halbert & Yang, Thomas Tao, 2016. "Testing for monotonicity in unobservables under unconfoundedness," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 183-202.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:84:y:2017:i:2:p:964-968.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.