IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Impact of EC Environmental Policy on British Coal

Listed author(s):
  • Newbery, David M

The Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 legalized a form of contingent contract between lawyers and clients in England and Wales. However, it maintained the historic ban on "American-style" contracts where lawyers receive a percentage of winnings in a successful case, but nothing in the event of case loss. The paper looks at the economic rationale for such American-style contingent fees. It then analyses the arguments used for and against them in Britain in the 1989/90 pre-legislation debate. This is done with reference to the theoretical and empirical economic literature such fees have generated. The arguments discussed concern access to justice, the possibility of excessive contingent fees, client-lawyer conflicts of interest and the quantity of litigation under the fees. The conclusion reached is that the British government's position on American-style fees is acceptable, except on the issue of excessive fees, and that it should continue to consider introducing contingent fees. Copyright 1993 by Oxford University Press.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

Volume (Year): 9 (1993)
Issue (Month): 4 (Winter)
Pages: 66-95

in new window

Handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:9:y:1993:i:4:p:66-95
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:oxford:v:9:y:1993:i:4:p:66-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)

or (Christopher F. Baum)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.