IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Ain't Wastin' Time No More: Subsidies for Renewable Energy, The SCM Agreement, Policy Space, and Law Reform

Listed author(s):
  • Luca Rubini
Registered author(s):

    Assuming that certain subsidies to support renewable energy may be 'good', the central question of this article is whether World Trade Organization (WTO) subsidy disciplines recognize this and offer appropriate policy space to Members. The analysis reveals that the situation is one of diffuse legal uncertainty, if not outright conflict between policy prescriptions and trade law requirements. The argument of the article is that the uncertainty of the legal assessment in itself produces a constraint on policy space. Some issues may be clarified through litigation but this is not the optimal approach since disputes are subject to many vagaries and may offer, at best, piece-meal and partial solutions. The pressure put on the judiciary should also not be underestimated. The analysis of the credible but controversial possibility of resorting to GATT Article XX to justify certain subsidies is the best example in point. The unsatisfactory nature of the legal framework is not merely hypothetical since subsidies for renewable energy are increasingly subject to disputes at both WTO and national levels. Against this scenario of inadequate legal framework and increasing litigiousness, law reform emerges as the first-best alternative. It is claimed that what is needed is a legal shelter that, in a clear and positive way, defines what types of subsidies supporting renewable energy are legitimate and permitted. The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Journal of International Economic Law.

    Volume (Year): 15 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 2 (June)
    Pages: 525-579

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:15:y:2012:i:2:p:525-579
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK

    Fax: 01865 267 985
    Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jieclw:v:15:y:2012:i:2:p:525-579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press)

    or (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.