IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v13y1989i2p307-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural Poverty and Relative Prices in India

Author

Listed:
  • Ghose, A K

Abstract

This paper begins with the observation that there has been a trend decline, albeit small, in rural poverty during 1956-83, but this is obscured by the substantial short-run fluctuations around the trend. It argues that while the trend is attributable to redistributive policies, the short-run fluctuations are adequately explained by the fluctuations in agricultural output and in relative prices of agricultural products vis-a-vis manufactures. In view of the finding that rising relative agricultural prices increase rural poverty, the paper goes on to analyze the process of determination of relative prices. This analysis highlights the characteristics of the inflationary process and the role of agricultural price policy in the Indian economy. Copyright 1989 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghose, A K, 1989. "Rural Poverty and Relative Prices in India," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(2), pages 307-331, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:13:y:1989:i:2:p:307-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:ilo:ilowps:285175 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:ilo:ilowps:286955 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Hazell, P. B. R. & Haddad, Lawrence James, 2001. "Agricultural research and poverty reduction:," 2020 vision discussion papers 34, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Singh, A. & Tabatabai H., 1992. "World economic crisis and third world agriculture: the changing role of agriculture in economic development," ILO Working Papers 992869553402676, International Labour Organization.
    5. Fan, Shenngen & Hazell, Peter & Haque, T., 2000. "Targeting public investments by agro-ecological zone to achieve growth and poverty alleviation goals in rural India," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 411-428, August.
    6. Surajit Deb, 2002. "The Debate on Agriculture-Industry Terms of Trade in India," Working papers 109, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    7. K.P. Kannan, 1995. "Public Intervention and Poverty Alleviation: A Study of the Declining Incidence of Rural Poverty in Kerala, India," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 26(4), pages 701-728, October.
    8. Tabatabai H., 1991. "Poverty monitoring in the rural sector," ILO Working Papers 992851753402676, International Labour Organization.
    9. S. Mahendra Dev, 2017. "Poverty and Employment: Roles of Agriculture and Non-agriculture," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 60(1), pages 57-80, March.
    10. Fan, Shenggen & Hazell, P. B. R., 1997. "Should India invest more in less-favored areas?:," EPTD discussion papers 25, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Fan, Shenggen & Hazell, P. B. R., 1999. "Are returns to public investment lower in less-favored rural areas?: an empirical analysis of India," EPTD discussion papers 43, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. M. H. Suryanarayana, 2002. "Poverty in India: Misspecified Policies and Estimates," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2002-15, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Fan, Shenggen & Hazell, P. B. R. & Thorat, Sukhadeo, 1999. "Linkages between government spending, growth, and poverty in rural India:," Research reports 110, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:13:y:1989:i:2:p:307-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.