IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i3p477-486..html

Spatial ecology of perceived predation risk and vigilance behavior in white-faced capuchins

Author

Listed:
  • Fernando A. Campos
  • Linda M. Fedigan

Abstract

Although predation has likely played a central role in the evolution of primate socioecology, we currently lack a thorough understanding of how fine-scale variation in perceived predation risk affects primates’ short-term space use patterns and predator avoidance strategies. We examined the spatial and ecological characteristics of predator encounters, as well as behavioral responses to perceived predation risk, in 5 groups of wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) in Costa Rica over a 1.5-year period. Alarm-calling bouts directed at birds were more likely to originate in high forest strata, whereas alarm-calling bouts at snakes and terrestrial quadrupeds were more likely to originate near the ground. Relative risk maps based on the locations of predator encounters revealed that high-risk areas for birds and for all guilds combined consisted of more mature forest, whereas low-risk areas for these predators consisted of relatively younger forest. The animals were most vigilant near the ground, which may reflect greater perceived exposure to snakes and terrestrial predators in lower vertical levels. Incorporating the combined risk function into a predictive model of vigilance behavior improved prediction relative to null models of uniform risk or habitat-specific risk. Our results suggest that capuchin monkeys in this study system perceive reduced predation risk in the high and middle forest layers, and they adjust their vigilance behavior to small-scale spatial variation in perceived risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernando A. Campos & Linda M. Fedigan, 2014. "Spatial ecology of perceived predation risk and vigilance behavior in white-faced capuchins," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 477-486.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:477-486.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Diggle, 1985. "A Kernel Method for Smoothing Point Process Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 34(2), pages 138-147, June.
    2. Roper Roy E. & Goodzey C., 2004. "Ecology of Fear," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 1(2), pages 1-7, January.
    3. Davies, Tilman M. & Hazelton, Martin L. & Marshall, Jonathan. C, 2011. "sparr: Analyzing Spatial Relative Risk Using Fixed and Adaptive Kernel Density Estimation in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 39(i01).
    4. Ben T. Hirsch & Lesley J. Morrell, 2011. "Measuring marginal predation in animal groups," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(3), pages 648-656.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frédéric Lavancier & Ronan Le Guével, 2021. "Spatial birth–death–move processes: Basic properties and estimation of their intensity functions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(4), pages 798-825, September.
    2. Nicoletta D’Angelo & Marianna Siino & Antonino D’Alessandro & Giada Adelfio, 2022. "Local spatial log-Gaussian Cox processes for seismic data," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(4), pages 633-671, December.
    3. Bouezmarni, Taoufik & Rombouts, Jeroen V.K., 2010. "Nonparametric density estimation for positive time series," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 245-261, February.
    4. Giuseppe Espa & Giuseppe Arbia & Diego Giuliani, 2013. "Conditional versus unconditional industrial agglomeration: disentangling spatial dependence and spatial heterogeneity in the analysis of ICT firms’ distribution in Milan," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 31-50, January.
    5. M. N. M. Lieshout, 2020. "Infill Asymptotics and Bandwidth Selection for Kernel Estimators of Spatial Intensity Functions," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 995-1008, September.
    6. Christopher S Fowler, 2018. "Key assumptions in multiscale segregation measures: How zoning and strength of spatial association condition outcomes," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 45(6), pages 1055-1072, November.
    7. Roba Bairakdar & Debbie Dupuis & Melina Mailhot, 2024. "Deviance Voronoi Residuals for Space-Time Point Process Models: An Application to Earthquake Insurance Risk," Papers 2410.04369, arXiv.org.
    8. Jeffery Caroline & Ozonoff Al & White Laura Forsberg & Pagano Marcello, 2013. "Distance-Based Mapping of Disease Risk," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 265-290, May.
    9. Nicoletta D'Angelo, 2025. "Detecting Changes in Space‐Varying Parameters of Local Poisson Point Processes," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), July.
    10. Nicolas Treich, 2022. "The Dasgupta Review and the Problem of Anthropocentrism," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(4), pages 973-997, December.
    11. Christoph Lambio & Tillman Schmitz & Richard Elson & Jeffrey Butler & Alexandra Roth & Silke Feller & Nicolai Savaskan & Tobia Lakes, 2023. "Exploring the Spatial Relative Risk of COVID-19 in Berlin-Neukölln," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Mola-Yudego, Blas & Selkimäki, Mari & González-Olabarria, José Ramón, 2014. "Spatial analysis of the wood pellet production for energy in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 76-83.
    13. Jeanne-Marie R. Stacciarini & Raffaele Vacca & Liang Mao, 2018. "Who and Where: A Socio-Spatial Integrated Approach for Community-Based Health Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, June.
    14. Mohammad Ghorbani & Nafiseh Vafaei & Mari Myllymäki, 2025. "A kernel-based test for the first-order separability of spatio-temporal point processes," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 34(3), pages 580-611, September.
    15. Pebesma, Edzer & Bivand, Roger & Ribeiro, Paulo Justiniano, 2015. "Software for Spatial Statistics," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i01).
    16. Peter Howe & Hilary Boudet & Anthony Leiserowitz & Edward Maibach, 2014. "Mapping the shadow of experience of extreme weather events," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 381-389, November.
    17. Yingqi Zhao & Donglin Zeng & Amy H. Herring & Amy Ising & Anna Waller & David Richardson & Michael R. Kosorok, 2011. "Detecting Disease Outbreaks Using Local Spatiotemporal Methods," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1508-1517, December.
    18. François Sémécurbe & Cécile Tannier & Stéphane G. Roux, 2019. "Applying two fractal methods to characterise the local and global deviations from scale invariance of built patterns throughout mainland France," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 271-293, June.
    19. Taylor, Benjamin M. & Davies, Tilman M. & Rowlingson, Barry S. & Diggle, Peter J., 2013. "lgcp: An R Package for Inference with Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Log-Gaussian Cox Processes," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 52(i04).
    20. Davies, Tilman M. & Jones, Khair & Hazelton, Martin L., 2016. "Symmetric adaptive smoothing regimens for estimation of the spatial relative risk function," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 12-28.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:477-486.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.