IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ora/journl/v1y2011i2p251-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Codes And Practices Of Implementation Of Corporate Governance In Romania And Results Reporting

Author

Listed:
  • GROSU MARIA

    (UNIVERSITATEA "AL. I. CUZA" IASI, FACULTATEA DE ECONOMIE SI ADMINISTRAREA AFACERILOR)

Abstract

Corporate governance refers to the manner in which companies are directed and controlled. Business management was always guided by certain principles, but the current meaning of corporate governance concerns and the contribution that companies must have the overall development of modern society. Romania used quite late in adopting a code of good practice in corporate governance, being driven, in particular, the privatization process, but also the transfer of control and surveillance of political organizations by the Board of Directors (BD). Adoption of codes of corporate governance is necessary to harmonize internal business requirements of a functioning market economy. In addition, the CEE countries, the European Commission adopted an action plan announcing measures to modernize company law and enhance corporate governance. Romania takes steps in this direction by amending the Company Law, and other regulations, although the practice does not necessarily keep pace with the requirements. This study aims on the one hand, an analysis of the evolution of corporate governance codes adopted in Romania, but also an empirical research of the implementation of corporate governance principles of a representative sample of companies listed on the Bucharest Stock Exchange (BSE). Consider relevant research methodology, because the issuer of the Codes of CG in Romania is BSE listed companies requesting their voluntary implementation. Implementation results are summarized and interpreted at the expense of public reports of the companies studied. Most studies undertaken in this direction have been made on multinational companies which respects the rule of corporate governance codes of countries of origin. In addition, many studies also emphasize the fair treatment of stakeholders rather than on models of governance adopted (monist/dualist) with implications for optimizing economic objectives but also social. Undertaken research attempts to highlight on the one hand, a misapplication of the principles of corporate governance in Romania at present, but also a lack of transparency in the dissemination and publication of information. They should promote a Board of Directors determined and would allow stakeholders access to information about the company. Research results can provide a basis for reconsidering the CG policies in Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Grosu Maria, 2011. "Codes And Practices Of Implementation Of Corporate Governance In Romania And Results Reporting," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 251-256, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:251-256
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2011/n2/034.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert W. McGee, 2008. "Corporate Governance in Transition Economies," Springer Books, in: Robert W. McGee (ed.), Corporate Governance in Transition Economies, chapter 1, pages 3-20, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bogdan Aurelian Mihail & Dalina Dumitrescu, 2021. "Corporate Governance from a Cross-Country Perspective and a Comparison with Romania," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Wölfle, 2009. "Information-based trade in Russia and the effects of listing abroad," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 42(4), pages 229-262, November.
    2. Nurlan Nurseiit, 2017. "The Consequences of the Choice of an Economic Model for the Development of CIS Countries," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 5(2), pages 110-140.
    3. Muravyev, Alexander, 2017. "Boards of directors in Russian publicly traded companies in 1998–2014: Structure, dynamics and performance effects," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 5-25.
    4. Bryan K. Church & Narisa Tianjing Dai & Xi (Jason) Kuang & Xuejiao Liu, 2020. "The Role of Auditor Narcissism in Auditor–Client Negotiations: Evidence from China," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(3), pages 1756-1787, September.
    5. Iuliana Oana MIHAI & Riana Iren RADU & Violeta ISAI, 2017. "Corporate Governance and Related Parties Transactions - Evidence from Romanian Listed Companies," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 124-134.
    6. Christopher P.P. Shafuda & Rainer Lenz & Matthew Mirecki, 2020. "Corporate Governance of SOEs and Compliance With the SOE Governance Act in Namibia: A Survey," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(4), pages 219249-2192, December.
    7. Dolgopyatova, Tatiana & Libman, Alexander & Yakovlev, Andrei, 2018. "Unintended Benefits of Empowering Boards in Conglomerates: A Case Study of AFK Sistema," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 23(2), pages 177-202.
    8. Iuliana Oana MIHAI & Riana Iren RADU, 2015. "Accounting Treatment for Separate and Consolidated Financial Statements," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 2, pages 140-145.
    9. Florin Alexandru Roman & Monica Violeta Achim & Robert W. McGee, 2023. "Fraud related to EU funds. The case of Romania," Journal of Financial Studies, Institute of Financial Studies, vol. 8(14), pages 120-142, May.
    10. Iuliana Oana MIHAI, 2013. "The Influence of Corporate Governance and Ownership Concentration on Company Performance - Evidence from Bucharest Stock Exchange," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 79-88.
    11. Ahnaf Ali Alsmady, 2018. "Ownership Structure and its Endogeneity Effect on the Quality of Financial Reporting," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(3), pages 509-526, March.
    12. Sergey Solntsev, 2013. "Senior management labor market: from economic growth to crisis. The case of Russia," HSE Working papers WP BRP 10/MAN/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    13. Ancuta Alina Gheorghe & Moisescu Florentina, 2017. "Study Regarding The Financial Reporting Of Intangible Assets. Case Of Romanian Pharmaceutical Industry," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 35(1), pages 163-172.
    14. Apostolov, Mico, 2010. "Governance and Enterprise Restructuring in Southeast Europe," MPRA Paper 27634, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate Governance; Governance Code; Corporate Governance Principles; Annual Report; Governance models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M48 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • N40 - Economic History - - Government, War, Law, International Relations, and Regulation - - - General, International, or Comparative

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ora:journl:v:1:y:2011:i:2:p:251-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin ZMOLE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feoraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.