IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/now/fntent/0300000012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economic Benefits and Costs of Entrepreneurship: A Review of the Research

Author

Listed:
  • van Praag, C. Mirjam
  • Versloot, Peter H.

Abstract

Many studies in the entrepreneurship literature are motivated by the statement that entrepreneurship has important economic value, for instance, in terms of productivity and growth, employment generation or, innovation. This claim is often substantiated by a reference to (at most) one or two studies finding supporting evidence. However, whether the cited reference was one of the few out of many studies that "happened" to find supportive evidence is not yet clear. This paper examines to what extent recent empirical evidence can collectively and systematically substantiate the claim that entrepreneurs cause important economic benefits. Hence, a systematic review is provided that answers the question: What is the contribution of entrepreneurs to the economy in comparison to non-entrepreneurs? We study the relative contribution of entrepreneurs to the economy based on four measures that have most widely been studied empirically. Hence, we answer the particular question: What is the contribution of entrepreneurs to (i) employment generation and dynamics, (ii) innovation, and (iii) productivity and growth, relative to the contributions of the entrepreneurs' counterparts, i.e., the "control group?" A fourth type of contribution studied is the role of entrepreneurship in increasing individuals' utility levels. Based on 57 recent studies of high quality that contain 87 relevant separate analyses, we conclude that entrepreneurs have a very important — but specific — function in the economy. They engender relatively much employment creation, productivity growth and produce and commercialize high quality innovations. They are more satisfied than employees. More importantly, recent studies show that entrepreneurial firms produce important spillovers that affect regional employment growth rates of all companies in the region in the long run. However, the counterparts cannot be missed as they account for a relatively high value of productivity and growth, a less volatile and more secure labor market, higher paid jobs and a greater number of innovations and they have a more active role in the adoption of innovations.

Suggested Citation

  • van Praag, C. Mirjam & Versloot, Peter H., 2007. "The Economic Benefits and Costs of Entrepreneurship: A Review of the Research," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 4(2), pages 65-154, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:now:fntent:0300000012
    DOI: 10.1561/0300000012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0300000012
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1561/0300000012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Lukeš & Jan Zouhar & Martina Jakl & Petr Očko, 2013. "Faktory ovlivňující vstup do podnikání: začínající podnikatelé v České republice [Factors Influencing Entrepreneurial Entry: Early-Stage Entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(2), pages 229-247.
    2. Magnus Henrekson & Dan Johansson, 2010. "Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 227-244, September.
    3. André Stel & José Millán & Concepción Román, 2014. "Investigating the impact of the technological environment on survival chances of employer entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 839-855, December.
    4. Mediha Sahin & Alina Todiras & Peter Nijkamp & Enno Masurel, 2012. "Economic performance of migrant entrepreneurs in the high-tech sector: design and application of the GALAXY model," Chapters, in: Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot & Mediha Sahin (ed.), Migration Impact Assessment, chapter 7, pages 227-260, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Brizeida Raquel Hernández-Sánchez & José Carlos Sánchez-García & Alexander Ward Mayens, 2019. "Impact of Entrepreneurial Education Programs on Total Entrepreneurial Activity: The Case of Spain," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Philipp Kruse & Eleanor Meda Chipeta & Imke Ueberschär, 2023. "What Keeps Social Entrepreneurs Happy? Exploring Personality, Work Design, External Support, and Social Impact as Resources of Social Entrepreneurs’ Mental Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, February.
    7. Mojtaba Shahin & Olivia Ilic & Christabel Gonsalvez & Jon Whittle, 2021. "The impact of a STEM-based entrepreneurship program on the entrepreneurial intention of secondary school female students," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1867-1898, December.
    8. Boettke, Peter J. & Coyne, Christopher J., 2009. "Context Matters: Institutions and Entrepreneurship," Foundations and Trends(R) in Entrepreneurship, now publishers, vol. 5(3), pages 135-209, March.
    9. Kerianne Lawson, 2022. "Currency iconography and entrepreneurship," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 257-264, December.
    10. Luigino Barisan & Marco Lucchetta & Cristian Bolzonella & Vasco Boatto, 2019. "How Does Carbon Footprint Create Shared Values in the Wine Industry? Empirical Evidence from Prosecco Superiore PDO’s Wine District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-13, May.
    11. Bjuggren, Carl Magnus & Daunfeldt, Sven-Olov & Johansson, Dan, 2010. "Ownership and High-Growth Firms," Ratio Working Papers 147, The Ratio Institute, revised 29 Sep 2010.
    12. Grossmann, Volker, 2009. "Entrepreneurial innovation and economic growth," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 602-613, December.
    13. Tomáš Volek & Martina Novotná, 2015. "Gross Value Added and Total Factor Productivity In Czech Sectors," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 9(1), March.
    14. Gerrit de Wit & Mercedes Teruel, 2011. "Determinants of high-growth firms," Scales Research Reports H201107, EIM Business and Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:now:fntent:0300000012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucy Wiseman (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nowpublishers.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.