IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nms/nomsmr/10.5771-2511-8676-2022-3-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User Value Perception of Native Apps versus Mini Programs: A Means-End Theory Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Ryu, Sunghan
  • Cheng, Kathleen
  • Schreieck, Maximilian

Abstract

This study examines the differences between native mobile applications (native apps) and mini programs (MPs) by identifying the attributes and consequences of both types of applications and comparing users’ value perceptions of them. We employ the means-end theory approach, suggesting a hierarchical representation of attributes, consequences, and values. 11 in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with experienced users of native apps and MPs in the tourism and travel context. The interviews generated two lists of attributes, consequences, and values from the coding processes: one for native apps and the other for MPs. Eight hierarchical value maps are created according to the association between the components at different levels, suggesting shared and unique values generated from using MPs in conjunction with native apps. Our study contributes to the pioneering literature on MPs and, more broadly, to the literature on mobile platform ecosystems in information systems and service research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryu, Sunghan & Cheng, Kathleen & Schreieck, Maximilian, 2022. "User Value Perception of Native Apps versus Mini Programs: A Means-End Theory Approach," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 6(3), pages 167-180.
    • Handle: RePEc:nms:nomsmr:10.5771/2511-8676-2022-3-167
    DOI: 10.5771/2511-8676-2022-3-167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/2511-8676-2022-3-167
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5771/2511-8676-2022-3-167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Murphy, Hilary Catherine & Chen, Meng-Mei & Cossutta, Mathieu, 2016. "An investigation of multiple devices and information sources used in the hotel booking process," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 44-51.
    2. Fang, Jiaming & Zhao, Zhirong & Wen, Chao & Wang, Ruping, 2017. "Design and performance attributes driving mobile travel application engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 269-283.
    3. Kimmo Karhu & Robin Gustafsson & Kalle Lyytinen, 2018. "Exploiting and Defending Open Digital Platforms with Boundary Resources: Android’s Five Platform Forks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 479-497, June.
    4. Lidija Lalicic & Christian Weismayer, 2018. "Being passionate about the mobile while travelling," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(8), pages 950-963, May.
    5. Benkenstein, Martin & Bruhn, Manfred & Büttgen, Marion & Hipp, Christiane & Matzner, Martin & Nerdinger, Friedemann W., 2017. "Topics for Service Management Research - A European Perspective," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 1(1), pages 4-21.
    6. Eaton, Ben & Elaluf-Calderwood, Silvia & Sorensen, Carsten & Yoo, Youngjin, 2015. "Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of Apple's iOS service system," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63272, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Wang, Dan & Xiang, Zheng & Fesenmaier, Daniel R., 2014. "Adapting to the mobile world: A model of smartphone use," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 11-26.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panos Constantinides & Ola Henfridsson & Geoffrey G. Parker, 2018. "Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 381-400, June.
    2. Uzunca, Bilgehan & Sharapov, Dmitry & Tee, Richard, 2022. "Governance rigidity, industry evolution, and value capture in platform ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    3. Andreas Hein & Maximilian Schreieck & Tobias Riasanow & David Soto Setzke & Manuel Wiesche & Markus Böhm & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "Digital platform ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 87-98, March.
    4. Fabian Schueler & Dimitri Petrik, 2022. "Objectives of platform research: A co-citation and systematic literature review analysis," Papers 2202.08822, arXiv.org.
    5. Susan Scott & Wanda Orlikowski, 2022. "The Digital Undertow: How the Corollary Effects of Digital Transformation Affect Industry Standards," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 311-336, March.
    6. Nambisan, Satish & Wright, Mike & Feldman, Maryann, 2019. "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    7. Saadatmand, Fatemeh & Lindgren, Rikard & Schultze, Ulrike, 2019. "Configurations of platform organizations: Implications for complementor engagement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    8. Scott, Susan V. & Orlikowski, Wanda J., 2022. "The digital undertow: how the corollary effects of digital transformation affect industry standards," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112426, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Michael Blaschke & Uwe Riss & Kazem Haki & Stephan Aier, 2019. "Design principles for digital value co-creation networks: a service-dominant logic perspective," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(3), pages 443-472, September.
    10. Felix B. Buesching & Dennis M. Steininger & Daniel J. Veit, 2023. "Governing digital crisis responses: platform standards and the dilemma of COVID-19 contact tracing," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 267-323, January.
    11. Jan Frederic Nerbel & Markus Kreutzer, 2023. "Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Kapoor, Kawaljeet & Ziaee Bigdeli, Ali & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Schroeder, Andreas & Beltagui, Ahmad & Baines, Tim, 2021. "A socio-technical view of platform ecosystems: Systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 94-108.
    13. Benedict Bender, 2020. "The Impact of Integration on Application Success and Customer Satisfaction in Mobile Device Platforms," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(6), pages 515-533, December.
    14. Miremadi, Iman & Khoshbash, Mostafa & Saeedian, MohammadMahdi, 2023. "Fostering generativity in platform ecosystems: How open innovation and complexity interact to influence platform adoption," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    15. Dias Sónia & Afonso Victor Alves, 2021. "Impact of Mobile Applications in Changing the Tourist Experience," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 113-120, December.
    16. Satish Nambisan & Yadong Luo, 2021. "Toward a loose coupling view of digital globalization," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(8), pages 1646-1663, October.
    17. Rand Al-Dmour & Ola H. Alkhatib & Hani Al-Dmour & Eatedal Basheer Amin, 2023. "The Influence of Social Marketing Drives on Brand Loyalty via the Customer Satisfaction as a Mediating Factor in Travel and Tourism Offices," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, June.
    18. Cenamor, Javier, 2021. "Complementor competitive advantage: A framework for strategic decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 335-343.
    19. Jens Foerderer & Thomas Kude & Sunil Mithas & Armin Heinzl, 2018. "Does Platform Owner’s Entry Crowd Out Innovation? Evidence from Google Photos," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 444-460, June.
    20. Md. Alamgir Hossain & Ruhul Amin & Abdullah Al Masud & Md. Imran Hossain & Mohammad Awal Hossen & Mohammad Kamal Hossain, 2023. "What Drives People’s Behavioral Intention Toward Telemedicine? An Emerging Economy Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nms:nomsmr:10.5771/2511-8676-2022-3-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nomos.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.