IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nbb/ecrart/y2017mjuneiip31-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public sector efficiency in Belgium

Author

Listed:
  • D. Cornille

    (National Bank of Belgium)

  • P. Stinglhamber

    (National Bank of Belgium)

  • L. Van Meensel

    (National Bank of Belgium)

Abstract

Efficiency is defined as the ability to obtain the best possible results using as few resources as possible. The constant quest for efficiency in public sector management is essential for all constituent parts of the State. So, general government as a whole is expected to make a continued effort to improve services provided to the community or to reduce their expenditure, or even pursue these two goals at the same time. Belgium has a particularly high level of public spending. Among the fifteen West European countries selected, Belgium lies in fourth place in terms of level of expenditure expressed as a percentage of GDP. Along with the Nordic countries, France and Austria, it is one of the States with above-average public expenditure. In view of this high public spending, the results obtained could be better. This, at least, is what emerges from a comparison of budgets allocated and performance in the fifteen countries analysed. This observation is valid for the four functions studied, namely health, education, security and mobility. At the end of the day, the degree of efficiency in Belgium’s public administration can only be described as average. Belgium is generally in a middle-of-the-road position, ahead of the Southern European countries but behind the Scandinavian countries. In Belgium, public action therefore offers undeniable potential for efficiency gains. Guaranteeing more efficient public policies is therefore a priority challenge, which requires continuing efforts to keep down costs while improving service. Over the next few years, greater efficiency of public action should in any case be a key objective for all levels of power in Belgium. But first of all, to achieve this objective, we need to adopt a systematic approach enabling the whole range of public sector missions to be analysed and choices made. Then, we have to look at which level of power is best placed to carry out these missions; any overlap should be avoided and economies of scale aimed for. And lastly, we have to work towards the most appropriate organisation of the way in which the various public services operate, notably by making the best use of IT applications and by simplifying procedures. Any reforms that may be needed must be envisaged from a long-term perspective and be rigourously enforced.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Cornille & P. Stinglhamber & L. Van Meensel, 2017. "Public sector efficiency in Belgium," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue i, pages 31-41, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2017:m:june:i:i:p:31-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nbb.be/en/articles/public-sector-efficiency-belgium
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dutu Richard & Sicari Patrizio, 2020. "Public Spending Efficiency in the OECD: Benchmarking Health Care, Education, and General Administration," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 20(3), pages 253-280, September.
    2. HINDRIKS, Jean & VERSCHELDE, Marijn, 2010. "L'école de la chance," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2247, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Stefan Siedentop & Stefan Fina, 2012. "Who Sprawls Most? Exploring the Patterns of Urban Growth across 26 European Countries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2765-2784, November.
    4. Valerie Schmitz & Robert Deschamps, 2014. "Financement et dépenses d’enseignement et de recherche fondamentale en Belgique : évolutions et comparaisons communautaires et internationales," Serie Politique Economique 73, Université de Namur, Centre de Recherches en Economie Regionale et Politique Economique.
    5. repec:nam:spolec:1313 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. António Afonso & José Alves, 2023. "Are fiscal consolidation episodes helpful for public sector efficiency?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(31), pages 3547-3560, July.
    2. Norman Gemmell & Patrick Nolan & Grant Scobie, 2017. "Public sector productivity: Quality adjusting sector-level data on New Zealand schools," Working Papers 2017/02, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    3. Åsa Johansson, 2016. "Public Finance, Economic Growth and Inequality: A Survey of the Evidence," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1346, OECD Publishing.
    4. Alessandra Cepparulo & Gilles Mourre, 2020. "How and How Much? The Growth-Friendliness of Public Spending through the Lens," European Economy - Discussion Papers 132, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    5. Marcela Prokopová & Ondřej Cudlín & Renata Včeláková & Szabolcs Lengyel & Luca Salvati & Pavel Cudlín, 2018. "Latent Drivers of Landscape Transformation in Eastern Europe: Past, Present and Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Zambon, Ilaria & Serra, Pere & Grigoriadis, Efstathios & Carlucci, Margherita & Salvati, Luca, 2017. "Emerging urban centrality: An entropy-based indicator of polycentric development and economic growth," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 365-371.
    7. Janne Tukiainen & Sebastian Blesse & Albrecht Bohne & Leonardo M. Giuffrida & Jan Jäässkeläinen & Ari Luukinen & Antti Sieppi, 2021. "What Are the Priorities of Bureaucrats? Evidence from Conjoint Experiments with Procurement Officials," EconPol Working Paper 63, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    8. Cláudia Braz & Sónia Cabral, 2023. "A macro approach to the relative efficiency of the Portuguese health system," Economic Bulletin and Financial Stability Report Articles and Banco de Portugal Economic Studies, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    9. António Afonso & João Tovar Jalles & Ana Venâncio, 2023. "Government Spending and Tax Revenue Decentralization and Public Sector Efficiency: Do Natural Disasters matter?," Working Papers REM 2023/0271, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    10. Luca Simone Rizzo & Filippo Smerghetto & Maria Giuseppina Lucia & Raffaela Gabriella Rizzo, 2017. "Sprawl Dynamics in Rural–Urban Territories Highly Suited for Wine Production. Mapping Urban Growth and Changing Territorial Shapes in North-East Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    11. López-Herrera, Carmen & Cordero, José M. & Pedraja-Chaparro, Francisco & Polo, Cristina, 2023. "Fiscal rules and their influence on public sector efficiency," MPRA Paper 119018, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Martina Halaskova & Renata Halaskova & Viktor Prokop, 2018. "Evaluation of Efficiency in Selected Areas of Public Services in European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Olanubi, Sijuola Orioye & Osode, Oluwanbepelumi Esther & Adegboye, Abiodun Adewale, 2020. "Public sector efficiency in the design of a euro-area social benefit scheme," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 615-627.
    14. Silvia Beghelli & Gianni Guastella & Stefano Pareglio, 2020. "Governance fragmentation and urban spatial expansion: Evidence from Europe and the United States [Governance-Fragmentierung und urbane räumliche Expansion: Erkenntnisse aus Europa und den USA]," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 40(1), pages 13-32, April.
    15. Olanubi, Sijuola Orioye & Osode, Oluwanbepelumi Esther, 2017. "The efficiency of government spending on health: A comparison of different administrations in Nigeria," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 79-98.
    16. Sofia Pagliarin, 2018. "Linking processes and patterns: Spatial planning, governance and urban sprawl in the Barcelona and Milan metropolitan regions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(16), pages 3650-3668, December.
    17. Idt, Joel & Pellegrino, Margot, 2021. "From the ostensible objectives of public policies to the reality of changes: Local orders of densification in the urban regions of Paris and Rome," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Diogo Ferraz & Enzo B. Mariano & Daisy Rebelatto & Dominik Hartmann, 2020. "Linking Human Development and the Financial Responsibility of Regions: Combined Index Proposals Using Methods from Data Envelopment Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 439-478, July.
    19. María Concepción Vega-Hernández & Carmen Patino-Alonso, 2021. "Comparing COSTATIS and Generalized Procrustes Analysis with Multi-Way Public Education Expenditure Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-13, July.
    20. Maria Alessandra Antonelli & Valeria De Bonis, 2018. "More is better with good institutions: evidence from European public social spending," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 16(2), pages 5-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2017:m:june:i:i:p:31-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bnbgvbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.