Author
Listed:
- Abigail Mumme-Monheit
(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus)
- Grace E. Gustafson
(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus)
- Colette A. Hopkins
(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus)
- Raisa Bailon-Zambrano
(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus)
- Juliana Sucharov
(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus)
- Michael J. Lippincott
(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus)
- Gregory P. Way
(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus)
- Kathryn L. Colborn
(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus)
- James T. Nichols
(University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus)
Abstract
In 1942 Waddington observed that phenotype variation among mutant animals is greater than in wild types. Here we update this observation to depict unexpected relationships between phenotype severity and variation. Using a zebrafish mef2ca allelic series representing a range in craniofacial phenotype severity, we tested the straightforward hypothesis that as phenotype severity increases, variation increases. We found that severity and variation were positively correlated, but only to a point. Variation collapsed in the most severe conditions. Mathematically, we found that the best fit for the relationship between severity and variation is a quadratic function. Across both zebrafish craniofacial phenotypes and human genetic disease, wild-type conditions produced low variation, moderate severity was associated with high variation, and conditions of extreme severity resulted in low variation. We propose that the quadratic relationship between severity and variation is a universal principle of biology that until now has not been formally tested.
Suggested Citation
Abigail Mumme-Monheit & Grace E. Gustafson & Colette A. Hopkins & Raisa Bailon-Zambrano & Juliana Sucharov & Michael J. Lippincott & Gregory P. Way & Kathryn L. Colborn & James T. Nichols, 2025.
"A quadratic paradigm describes the relationship between phenotype severity and variation,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63316-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-63316-2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-63316-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.